A Change Of Heart About Animals Analysis

Decent Essays
I agree with your article “A Change of Heart About Animals” for the most part. I agree animals of all kinds can be intelligent and have complex emotions. Your article made me question the way I thought about all animals. I believe animals should have rights and should be treated more fairly instead of just being thought of as inanimate objects. In paragraph eight of your article you talk about Koko a gorilla in California who can use sign language and knows over 1,000 signs. I looked up the Gorilla Foundation where Koko was taught sign language and found their website. Their website gave more informations about how Koko was taught sign language and how she uses sign language in her everyday life. This only furthers my belief that animals

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Your newspaper recently published an editorial by Jeremy Rifkin, author of The Biotech Century and president of the foundation on economic trends. The essay is entitled "A Change of Heart about Animals." In this essay Rifkin cites scientific studies about pigs, birds, and a monkey that all point to animals potentially having much greater intelligence and capacity to feel than we often give them credit for. He also speaks about various movements in support of animal rights and advocated greater empathy from humans to animals.(Rifkin 34-35) Rifkin's focus on animal empathy seems entirely detached from the reality of the situation; his piece fails to consider the socioeconomic implications of extended animal rights.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Regarding Bob Stevens’ response to Rifkin’s editorial “A Change of Heart About Animals”, I would like to point out that Stevens’ arguments are quite weak. Most noticeable is Stevens’ overt use of hyperbole, by which he attempts to poke holes in Rifkin’s writing. While Rifkin simply mentions the practice of providing pigs with toys to keep them happy, Steven’s makes the unnecessary claim that providing pigs with toys shows that they matter more than children, and that this will ultimately lead to children having no toys. Not only is this a fallacy (a slippery slope fallacy to be exact), but this is obviously not true. With all of today’s manufacturers and caring parents, it’s highly unlikely that this sort of thing would happen.…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In response to “A Change of Heart about Animals” Rifkin states that animals are more like us than we imagined. He also says that “researchers are finding is that many of our fellow creatures are more like us than we had ever imagined.” I honestly disagree with him because I believe that animals should have rights yes, but I disagree with on the fact that wild animals shouldn’t have rights. Now, house pets such as dogs should have rights in the house, obviously, but they shouldn’t have the exact same rights as us humans. Now, I know most of us in this class treat our pets like humans, but does that really mean they should get the exact same rights as us?…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the article written by Jeremy Rifkin titled “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Rifkin argues that researchers have found that animals are similar to humans, which changes our perspectives of them. He elaborates how the research funded by fast food franchises reveal that pigs require mental and physical stimuli to function and how that caused European countries to change the way they treat pigs. The author extends on the similar emotional and cognitive abilities of animals and humans by demonstrating studies on the conceptual abilities of New Caledonian crows and the language abilities of Koko the gorilla. Rifkin continues to describe how animals have self-awareness and understand when they die, as evidenced by observations of orangutans…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Jeremy Rifkin asserts, “[Animals] feel pain, suffer and experience stress, affection, excitement and even love.” Not necessarily so. Is there any evidence that animals mourn on the death of other animals, or party at birth of new animals? Do they live with their partners or family if animals experience affection and love? Rifkin makes a bold claim that pigs need social(human) contact because they are easily depressed if isolated, but he doesn’t support it scientifically.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This quote shows that the author is not on anyone’s side, just stating the facts. By him saying this it makes me more trustworthy in him. Along with other quotes such as “ I don't support the abuse of animals” Also showing how open minded he is on the subject. This is a well put together article because he states the pros and cons of both sides.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since they lack the ability to reason, they can’t have rights so they aren’t responsible. Does that make it acceptable to treats animals badly? Of course not; but animals can’t decide their fate so the humans must decide for them. In "An Animal's Place," Michael Pollan introduces Peter Singer's argument, which is both difficult, and simple to argue against. Based on equality, people realize they aren’t equal at all: "Some are smarter than others, more gifted, and better looking.”…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There has been an ongoing debate on whether it is logical to have animal rights or not. You can either say that animal rights is foolish because animals are not developed enough to understand human behavior and they do not experience the same struggles as humans, therefore, they should not be given the same rights. On the other hand, one who supports animal rights, might say that animals should be given rights because even though they may not have the same human experiences, they do experience physical pain, emotion, and stress. They are still living beings, which makes it our responsibility to preserve the welfare of animals. Well what do you think?…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What does it mean to have a heart of change? Animals are much more similar to us than the scientific community believed for a long time, but today many in the scientific community believe that they experience, excitement and depression and the same emotions as human beings. They have a surprising level of intelligence, in that they can achieve sophisticated tool making tasks and posses qualities that the majority of people never imagined. It is so hard to realize that so many human beings are treating our fellow companion with no regards. In “ A Change of Heart about Animals” Jeremy Rifkin claims that all animals have similar qualities as human beings and that they deserve as much respect as us.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am writing to you, Jeremy Rifkin, today to talk about the article that you have written “A Change of Heart about Animals”. In the article you talk about how animals do have at least basic human feelings and if not more. That “many of our fellow creatures are more like us than we had ever imagined”. That we should do something about how we treat the animals around us. I absolutely agree with you and think we should treat the animals around us differently than we do now.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sue Savage-Rumbaugh is an American psychologist who tried, and succeeded, teaching an ape, bonobo, how to use a language. Animals can learn to use a language. One example is Kanzi, a 26-year-old male bonobo. Animals are more intelligent than we think, they don’t talk but they understand each other, scientists have been successful in teaching animals out language, and they can communicate in many different ways. Language is not just talking, in fact, it is how people or animals share their thoughts or ideas.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay “An Argument for Animalism” by Eric T. Olson, he concludes that personal identity is psychological continuity. I will disagree with Olson’s ideas about personal identity in the brain-transplant and the thinking-animal argument. The main point of the paper is about animalism. Olson’s argument is that each one of us is numerically identical to a human animal. Olson says that a person could exist who is not numerically identical to any animal, but it’s not the case for you and I. Olson, then presents his ‘Thinking-Animal Argument’ and the alternatives to that.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I was able to watch the complete Nova video, “What are Animals Thinking”. The three most interesting and informative parts of this video are the rat experiment, infrasonic sound and house –hunting bees’ ability to find new homes. The free rats in this video actually showed empathy towards the trapped rats. At the University of Chicago Mrs. Mason showed two different test the first two rats in a box one was trapped in a tube the other was free. The free rat figured out how to open the door to set the other free.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    This essay’s objective is to present both sides of the issue, allowing the reader to further investigate and form their own ethical stance for or against animal rights. For many, it is…

    • 1264 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Welfare Essay

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the world today, people cannot do without animals because they have become an essential part of human existence to both vegetarians and meat eaters. Some animals serve as pet, and some serve as food, and others are used for sports and laboratory experiments. Although some animal activist advocates for animal rights, there are limits to that right because animals cannot be equal with human. They don’t have the intellectual ability that humans have to take responsibilities and control what happens around them. These animals are important in the society and the need to treat them with respect is paramount.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays