Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals Analysis

Improved Essays
In “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Jeremy Rifkin asserts, “[Animals] feel pain, suffer and experience stress, affection, excitement and even love.” Not necessarily so. Is there any evidence that animals mourn on the death of other animals, or party at birth of new animals? Do they live with their partners or family if animals experience affection and love? Rifkin makes a bold claim that pigs need social(human) contact because they are easily depressed if isolated, but he doesn’t support it scientifically. According to Science, “Only individuals of same species makes up a population.” If this is true and scientifically valid for habitation on planet, then how come humans can take pigs out of depression? Even though animals

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    And that maybe with interacting with so many people they would have a healthy mental state. Now, there are numerous reasons why groups and organizations believe any and all animals should be free and enjoying the wild and the rest of their families. Sadly, this isn’t true. In the the documentary it brings up how killer whales are starved for their behavior or…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dear, Editor In Rifkin’s argument he claims that animals are capable of feeling the same feelings we are able to. I personally think Rifkin is right, as a pet owner I can see and also feel the love they have towards me and I can guarantee they can feel that same love towards them. Animals have their own way of showing their love, they can’t speak our language so they show their love in their own way. For example, when I come home from school and my dog sees me he comes running to see me and jumps on me and starts to bark, you can tell he is showing that he is excited to see me.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Your newspaper recently published an editorial by Jeremy Rifkin, author of The Biotech Century and president of the foundation on economic trends. The essay is entitled "A Change of Heart about Animals." In this essay Rifkin cites scientific studies about pigs, birds, and a monkey that all point to animals potentially having much greater intelligence and capacity to feel than we often give them credit for. He also speaks about various movements in support of animal rights and advocated greater empathy from humans to animals.(Rifkin 34-35) Rifkin's focus on animal empathy seems entirely detached from the reality of the situation; his piece fails to consider the socioeconomic implications of extended animal rights.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The repetition of stories about the death of babies, or other loved ones, and the disturbance it causes to the family will make every reader who is an animal lover cringe and emotionally connect to the story. The argument is constantly being supported by anecdotes and research statistics from multiple different resources, which in turn provides a wide variety of credible information. Then she ties it all back together by making direct comparisons to the way humans feel and react to loss and the key similarities in the way animals experience loss as…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In response to “A Change of Heart about Animals” Rifkin states that animals are more like us than we imagined. He also says that “researchers are finding is that many of our fellow creatures are more like us than we had ever imagined.” I honestly disagree with him because I believe that animals should have rights yes, but I disagree with on the fact that wild animals shouldn’t have rights. Now, house pets such as dogs should have rights in the house, obviously, but they shouldn’t have the exact same rights as us humans. Now, I know most of us in this class treat our pets like humans, but does that really mean they should get the exact same rights as us?…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Re “A Change of Heart about Animals” I believe Rifkin establishes a valid argument that we should treat animals more humanely, although to a certain extent. Rifkin establishes ethos, since he’s an environmental activist, and while there certainly is an emotional appeal in the form of animals’ feelings and logos in the form of studies proving some animals can think, does his message convey towards all animals? I think Rifkin’s ideas apply more towards superior animal with definite intellect and that we should change our treatments towards those animals specifically.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article, “A change of Hearts about Animals,” by Jeremy Rifkin, he argues that the new findings by scientists show that animals are more similar to humans than we thought. In these findings we see that animals have emotion like they feel pain, get stressed, get happy and feel love like humans do. To support his claim he explains that there are studies that suggest that animals can acquire language skills, use tools, show self-awareness and pass on knowledge to the next generation. Through stating that animals are more like humans he wants humans to treat animals better.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The result is that readers will now believe that animals have feelings and self-awareness as well, based on the research Rifkin found. This makes it more likely for us to believe the claim Rifkin is stating, which is that we should expand the humane treatment of…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Herzog Human Morality

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Animals who are not subject for human benefit are allowed to return to their environment, where they have been for the beginning of time. In some ways, allowing animals to live benefits the animal and allows the natural flow of earth to continue; however, by allowing a human to be born, it can be said that it would cause emotional stress. Animals are not here for our benefit, just as women are not here to give birth to a child. However, in the…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    "Animals feel pain, suffer and stress, affection,excitement, and even love ." Rifkin States in his argument. science doesnt have to prove that, people who own pets know their pet feel different emotions. Animals have feelings and potentials not very different from humans. stories such as Kokos, a 300-pound gorilla who was taugh sign language and understands…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I have had a lot of animals in my lifetime and I am only 16. We have had horses, fish, cats, dogs, and rabbits. The thing that comes with having animals is heartbreak. My least favorite thing about having animals is when they die or runaway. I didn’t really care when my fish died, and some of the cats.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am writing to you, Jeremy Rifkin, today to talk about the article that you have written “A Change of Heart about Animals”. In the article you talk about how animals do have at least basic human feelings and if not more. That “many of our fellow creatures are more like us than we had ever imagined”. That we should do something about how we treat the animals around us. I absolutely agree with you and think we should treat the animals around us differently than we do now.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hesse G. Sambaan September 25, 2017 Comp II What’s wrong with the animal rights by Vicki Hearne Vicki Hearne thinks that there is more for animal satisfaction for happiness that is the personal achievement. Animals find happiness in their work that they do that you can call “talent”. She believes that animal right advocates got all it wrong, making some of the animals suffer and they are more concern of arguing than the animal’s happiness. The essay was persuasive, she uses her own knowledge as animal trainer and she proves that the only one who can really define the animal’s happiness is the owner. to clarify her own essays, she also uses her own animals, her experienced, and a lot of examples.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay “An Argument for Animalism” by Eric T. Olson, he concludes that personal identity is psychological continuity. I will disagree with Olson’s ideas about personal identity in the brain-transplant and the thinking-animal argument. The main point of the paper is about animalism. Olson’s argument is that each one of us is numerically identical to a human animal. Olson says that a person could exist who is not numerically identical to any animal, but it’s not the case for you and I. Olson, then presents his ‘Thinking-Animal Argument’ and the alternatives to that.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Deciding how to interact and improve the world through ethics and moral reasoning is an ongoing contentious debate that has lasted for thousands of years. Two of the largest moral theories to develop in the twentieth century, that try to deal with the world around us, is environmentalism and animal liberation. Environmentalism is best summarized as the moral principle that biotic communities and the relationships within those communities are of the utmost importance to preserve. Animal Liberation represents the belief that sentience of a being qualifies that individual for moral consideration. If Leopold’s maxim is followed as the standard for land ethicism and the “when” in his maxim is read as a necessary condition then animal liberation…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays