A Change Of Heart About Animals Rifkin Summary

Decent Essays
In response to “A Change of Heart about Animals” Rifkin states that animals are more like us than we imagined. He also says that “researchers are finding is that many of our fellow creatures are more like us than we had ever imagined.” I honestly disagree with him because I believe that animals should have rights yes, but I disagree with on the fact that wild animals shouldn’t have rights. Now, house pets such as dogs should have rights in the house, obviously, but they shouldn’t have the exact same rights as us humans. Now, I know most of us in this class treat our pets like humans, but does that really mean they should get the exact same rights as us? The right to drive, get jobs (excluding therapy dogs) and have their own house? The reasons

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Dear, Editor In Rifkin’s argument he claims that animals are capable of feeling the same feelings we are able to. I personally think Rifkin is right, as a pet owner I can see and also feel the love they have towards me and I can guarantee they can feel that same love towards them. Animals have their own way of showing their love, they can’t speak our language so they show their love in their own way. For example, when I come home from school and my dog sees me he comes running to see me and jumps on me and starts to bark, you can tell he is showing that he is excited to see me.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although humans have evolved to the point where we can devote some attention to honoring the animals that help us build our society, we should not degenerate our society to account for their feelings. One such story of degeneration is of Kevin Martin, a man whose research of AIDS medication was halted by the Swiss Health Department on account of an ethic review that had already been approved by other organizations.(Yong 39) Another example are animals farmed for meat consumption. Although ultimately, they are born just to die, they aren't killed for the sake of killing; They are killed to aid human society. As callous as it sounds, animals having more rights would work to stagnate human progress due to extra regulations both legally and…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article, “A change of Hearts about Animals,” by Jeremy Rifkin, he argues that the new findings by scientists show that animals are more similar to humans than we thought. In these findings we see that animals have emotion like they feel pain, get stressed, get happy and feel love like humans do. To support his claim he explains that there are studies that suggest that animals can acquire language skills, use tools, show self-awareness and pass on knowledge to the next generation. Through stating that animals are more like humans he wants humans to treat animals better.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The result is that readers will now believe that animals have feelings and self-awareness as well, based on the research Rifkin found. This makes it more likely for us to believe the claim Rifkin is stating, which is that we should expand the humane treatment of…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nobody should have a choice or be forced to be vegan. Rifkin argues that science has shown that the difference between animals and humans are less than we think and we should extend more “empathy” to animals. I disagree with that. The reason why is because animals naturally kill other animals. If a hawk does not care about the feelings of a rabbit that it eats, why should we be different ?…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe granting animals equal rights would be disastrous to the environment, and negate the greatest good for all. Humans have a responsibility to our environment from both a responsibility to all things that live in it, as well as from a self-preservation standpoint. Decisions regarding moral responsibility reign beyond the rights of each individual unit in the ecosystem, with consideration to the greatest good for all. However, totally acknowledgement of Calicott’s premise is difficult as a unit within the ecosystem.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lastly, he concludes his article questioning the morality of animal testing and animal captivity, suggesting that we should be advocating on giving animals equal consideration, considering that they have the same basic abilities just like humans, for example, pain and emotions, are as important to our ecosystem just like every other human being living on this planet. I acknowledge that Rifkin’s argument is very true but I also believe that it is flawed at the same time. In all of the examples that Rifkin gives in his article only accounts for maybe less than 1 percent of the animal population that possesses these unusual traits. Not all animals can understand sign language or is able to fashion a tool out of a wire stick. Instead, I thought that he should have focused more on common, everyday scenarios that affects society as a whole, such as human and animal relationships as pets, keystone species, and the effects that animals have on…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What does it mean to have a heart of change? Animals are much more similar to us than the scientific community believed for a long time, but today many in the scientific community believe that they experience, excitement and depression and the same emotions as human beings. They have a surprising level of intelligence, in that they can achieve sophisticated tool making tasks and posses qualities that the majority of people never imagined. It is so hard to realize that so many human beings are treating our fellow companion with no regards. In “ A Change of Heart about Animals” Jeremy Rifkin claims that all animals have similar qualities as human beings and that they deserve as much respect as us.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author’s main purpose about defending the rights of the animals is that they are living creatures. His strong claim determines that researchers are finding animals are more like humans than we ever realized. However, defying by Rifkin’s statement’s and the reason he points out the connection is because us people have not really payed attention to be able to realize the similarity. Animals pass on learning or skills to their young ones which goes the same exact way with humans, most likely why many children look up to or choose to follow their parents footsteps.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no doubting the fact that animals do not have rights in the conventional sense, or in any other sense for that matter. The reason is because they are not moral agents; they cannot do things out of a sense of right or wrong and cannot reason, as opposed to humans. Without reasoning, they are unable to have rights and therefore, are not responsible. Does that mean humans have the right to treat animals badly? Of course not; but that is for humans to decide, because animals cannot decide anything.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am writing to you, Jeremy Rifkin, today to talk about the article that you have written “A Change of Heart about Animals”. In the article you talk about how animals do have at least basic human feelings and if not more. That “many of our fellow creatures are more like us than we had ever imagined”. That we should do something about how we treat the animals around us. I absolutely agree with you and think we should treat the animals around us differently than we do now.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In comparison of “All Animals Are Equal and Moral Standing,” the “Value of Lives, and Speciesism” the key differences are based on the values outlined by the writers. In Value of Lives and Speciesism, Frey discusses the importance of animals feel pain and suffer just as humans do, but also admits that there are reasons such as necessary medical research for harming animals. On the other hand, Singer’s All Animals Are Equal focuses on the rights of hemostats in comparison to those who can make intelligent decisions. The question is should non-human animals have rights and how far do those rights reach? Both agree that animals should have rights, but their major differences including, pleasure and pain, hierarchy, consumption, and richness of life.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal’s Capabilities In Bonnie Steinbock’s “Speciesism and the Idea of Equality” she provides arguments against those of Peter Singers in his article “All Animals are Equal.” Steinbock argues that non-human animals should have specifics rights. She didn’t go as far as saying that they should have the right to vote or marry, but the right to be recognized as coherent beings just as capable of suffering and feeling as we are. The way that I see it, Steinbock provides some valid points but fails to acknowledge the quantity of animals in our world, and that there are some animals that we don’t care if they suffer.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thesis Statement Animals deserve rights, and these rights should annihilate the problems with animal abuse, abandonment, and animal experimentation. Purpose Statement The purpose of this research paper is to discuss animal rights and what animals right activist ideology fight for which includes animal abuse, abandonment, experimentation, and laws that prevent inhuman actions towards animals.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animal Rights Should animals have rights? If so, should these rights be comparable to those given to humans? Animal Rights are rights believed to be owed to animals in order for them to live full lives, free from suffering. Animals are currently being used, and in some cases abused, in medical research, clothing industries, hunting for sport, food, and population control, and countless other services to humans. As is the case with all ethical issues, there are two defined perspectives and supporters of the current and future treatment given and due to animals.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays