12 Angry Men Character Traits

Improved Essays
This movie with full of messages on how the personality, attitude, emotions and group dynamic influence the decision making process. We can relate this movie with current situation in our own organization on how the management teams make a decision on any situation arise. Individuals are likely to evaluate about any target more positively when they are in happy mood rather than in sad mood (Norbert Schwarz, 2000).

4. PERSONALITY OF JUROR
Personality traits are very important and play a big role especially in the decision making process. Schermerhorn, et al. (2012, p. 29) has described personality is overall combination of characteristics that capture the unique nature of a person as that person reacts to and interacts with others. Based on
…show more content…
This juror is well-spoken and his way of thinking more on logical. He believed the accused as guilty because he had preconceived motions about people from the slums. He avoids the emotional arguments and engages in rational discussion. He changes his vote due to the witness's testimony is discredited.

As a young man, Jack Klugman is afraid of expressing his opinion to the members of the group. He is juror 5 and grew up in the slums and have experience watched some of the various fights. He had introvert personality, however he is a good decision maker and sympathetic to the defendant. Feeling inferior status while going through the discussion. His vote is "not guilty" when he has a good reason for his opinion.

Edward bins as a juror 6 was described as an honest person, good decision maker, sympathetic and aggressive. But he is dull-witted men and take a time to see the good about other people. However, finally he agrees with Juror 8 after he removed the mind spreads generated by jury 3, 4, 10 with hot
…show more content…
He is racism, not proper thinker, abusive, prejudice, arrogant, insensitive and biased. Most of jurors doesn't like him based on his opinion and speech was disturbs the rest of juror. Changes his mind when all the others jurors are against him and specifically when jury 4 tells him to keep quite and not to speak.

Juror 11 was interested to be a jury because he has witnessed great injustices that happen before. He was described as a good decision maker, rational thinker, supportive, team player, open-minded, agreeable and good natured. Changes his decision based on the arguments put forth by jury 8. He gets convinced that there is reasonable doubt in the evidence which makes him change his decision to not guilty.

Personality juror 12 was similar to juror 7 such as not interested, unfocused, non reasoning and indiscipline. But also described as an arrogant and impatient person. He wants to be an important person and has changed his mind based on the decision by

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He was one of the most timid Juror, and since he shared similar background with the defendant, Juror 8 made personal connection with him and seeked his consultation (consistently asking him for his opinion). After the trial he voted guilty because he felt everyone else thought the same too, he was not the kind of person who had a strong stand like Juror No.8. But at some level he was confident about his decision (guilty) since, he did not change his vote (during the second vote) even after he was insulted by other Jurors about his origin. The reason for not changing his decision maybe he felt that it was not right to let a murderer out in the street because he was offended by other Jurors. Sensitive and soft spoken, he was nervous about expressing his feelings especially in front of his seniors.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, Juror 3 repeatedly accused many jurors of lying, which is where he lost the other’s vote. Juror 8’s calm nature favored the jury's attention.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Really when you read the story and really understand it, it comes down to both of the men not being bad. The lawyer is a good guy he gives Bartleby a chance to prove himself when he starts to work for the lawyer. After all the times, Bartleby does not want to do his work the lawyer lets it slide if that was another boss he probably would have been given one more chance and if not he could have been fired on the spot. The man who bought the building after the lawyer was not as nice as the lawyer he told the lawyer to get Bartleby out or he would be calling the authorities. Wit He had Bartleby put into jail because he was trespassing, and still living in the building that was not his.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some may say that proving such a large number of stubborn people wrong may be impossible without being tyrannical. Nevertheless, juror eight’s way of persuasion deserves nothing but praise. “I’m not trying to make anyone accept it. I’m just saying it’s possible.”( 12 Angry Men). Juror eight tries to make the other jurors question themselves, not shove his opinion down their throats.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Guilty.” (Rose 26) Juror #8 was able to persuade another juror into believing that the boy was innocent of any crime. Juror #8 persuaded the other jurors by arguing the facts and making the other jurors see them in a new light. Juror #8 did not lie or bully the other juror to believe in his side of the story instead he argued the alternate facts of the case because Juror #8 is looking at the case from as unbiased a view as he can attempt. Juror #8 is trying to offer the boy compassion and fairness instead of mistrust and hatred like some of the other jurors. In The Crucible, Abigail demanded the other girls listen to her and she told them this, “Let either of you breather a work, or the edge of a word, about the other thing, and I will come to you in the black of some terrible night and I will bring a pointy reckoning that will shudder you.”…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why would he lie? What’s he got to gain, Nine: Attention maybe?” Eight makes a good statement when saying that the Old man’s view doesn’t make sense due to the El train blocking his view and hearing. Nine tends to agree with Eight saying that the old ma In the beginning of the play almost every Juror in the room picks “Guilty” except for Juror Eight. He believes that the boy is “Not-Guilty” saying that the evidence is somewhat false. Of course the other Jurors don’t believe it.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 In 12 Angry Men

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He is soft spoken and looks as if he has given up on life, which shows in the way he walks and holds himself, but is observant, wise and has a fair-minded attitude and wants that justice be done. A fairly quiet person, he managed to change the minds of other jurors to vote as “ not guilty”, based on his strong arguments and by raising a number of reasonable doubts. He is the first one to support juror 8 as he feels that although at that point he thinks the boy is guilty, he did not want juror 8 to stand on his own against the others. He mentioned that he felt as if he knew the old man, who was one of the witnesses, further explaining that the old man was probably saying more than he knew because he was seeking attention so everyone would take notice of him. Juror 9 felt a connection here with the old witness, as he himself knew how it felt to be old and alone.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror eight did a tremendous job of appealing to the emotions of the others; as his approach changes the minds of the jurors. For example, Juror number nine says “this gentleman has been standing alone against us, he doesn’t say the boy isn’t guilty, he just isn’t sure” (12 angry men 1957). This statement by juror nine gives the viewers an understanding on how good juror eight appealed to the emotions of the others. He did not say that the boy wasn’t guilty; he provided evidence, and showed the others that there are possibilities that the boy did not kill his father. The discussion continues as they bring up the testimony of the witnesses of the murder.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By juror #8 not going along with the group, he demonstrates the limits of conformity one of which is the sense of self. Juror #8 showed high self-esteem and leadership that help him to combat the pressure of conformity. After reaching a 11 to 1 vote, the other jurors are quick to criticise juror # 8 but he stands his ground and ask the group to think about the matter a bit more. A second voting takes place but this time by ballots. The results from the ballots show a second not guilty vote.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roles In Twelve Angry Men

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As long as there is a room for a reasonable doubt, Henry will defend the case. Juror nine is the old man with a quiet nature, but with an insightful remarks. He is the supporter-encourager of the group because he lets juror eight speak his mind without any judgement. Even though his votes were different than juror eight, the old man believes every person should have their opinions heard out especially a person like juror eight who is taking a stand on his own. Juror ten is the garage owner who has regular anger outburst like juror three the angry father.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays