12 Angry Men Character Traits

Improved Essays
This movie with full of messages on how the personality, attitude, emotions and group dynamic influence the decision making process. We can relate this movie with current situation in our own organization on how the management teams make a decision on any situation arise. Individuals are likely to evaluate about any target more positively when they are in happy mood rather than in sad mood (Norbert Schwarz, 2000).

4. PERSONALITY OF JUROR
Personality traits are very important and play a big role especially in the decision making process. Schermerhorn, et al. (2012, p. 29) has described personality is overall combination of characteristics that capture the unique nature of a person as that person reacts to and interacts with others. Based on
…show more content…
This juror is well-spoken and his way of thinking more on logical. He believed the accused as guilty because he had preconceived motions about people from the slums. He avoids the emotional arguments and engages in rational discussion. He changes his vote due to the witness's testimony is discredited.

As a young man, Jack Klugman is afraid of expressing his opinion to the members of the group. He is juror 5 and grew up in the slums and have experience watched some of the various fights. He had introvert personality, however he is a good decision maker and sympathetic to the defendant. Feeling inferior status while going through the discussion. His vote is "not guilty" when he has a good reason for his opinion.

Edward bins as a juror 6 was described as an honest person, good decision maker, sympathetic and aggressive. But he is dull-witted men and take a time to see the good about other people. However, finally he agrees with Juror 8 after he removed the mind spreads generated by jury 3, 4, 10 with hot
…show more content…
He is racism, not proper thinker, abusive, prejudice, arrogant, insensitive and biased. Most of jurors doesn't like him based on his opinion and speech was disturbs the rest of juror. Changes his mind when all the others jurors are against him and specifically when jury 4 tells him to keep quite and not to speak.

Juror 11 was interested to be a jury because he has witnessed great injustices that happen before. He was described as a good decision maker, rational thinker, supportive, team player, open-minded, agreeable and good natured. Changes his decision based on the arguments put forth by jury 8. He gets convinced that there is reasonable doubt in the evidence which makes him change his decision to not guilty.

Personality juror 12 was similar to juror 7 such as not interested, unfocused, non reasoning and indiscipline. But also described as an arrogant and impatient person. He wants to be an important person and has changed his mind based on the decision by

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He was one of the most timid Juror, and since he shared similar background with the defendant, Juror 8 made personal connection with him and seeked his consultation (consistently asking him for his opinion). After the trial he voted guilty because he felt everyone else thought the same too, he was not the kind of person who had a strong stand like Juror No.8. But at some level he was confident about his decision (guilty) since, he did not change his vote (during the second vote) even after he was insulted by other Jurors about his origin. The reason for not changing his decision maybe he felt that it was not right to let a murderer out in the street because he was offended by other Jurors.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the juror, Juror #3, passionately wanted to execute the young man for his deeds. This juror was unsympathetic due to his personal grudge. He did not have a good relationship with his son and his son left him; this young man reminded him of his son. Although Juror #3 insisted that he was basing his decision on facts, he brought personal matters into the jury even when the facts were refuted. The defendant exhibited similarities to Juror #3’s son, which led to the tendency of this juror to treat the defendant less favorably.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Except for juror number eight, peer pressure impaired their judgment. Based on his maturity level it indicated that the greatest differences are found in juror number eight and three. Once juror (Jack) changed his vote from guilty to not guilty only because the rest of them eventually voted not guilty also. It showed many times that the several jurors changed their minds from not guilty to guilty and vice versa under peer pressure, and overpowering of the strong willed ones.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Contradicting his opinion troubles Juror #2 and causes him to respond meekly. He also does not have a lot of power in the room, which contributes to his guilty vote. When the foreman said, “All those voting “guilty” raise your hands,” Juror #2 immediately looks around the room and saw some hands raise and then raises his own hand (11). Because of his unassertive personality, he is vulnerable to the other juror’s opinions. Although he is extremely timid, he starts to gain his voice because he is starting to get tired of being pushed aside by Juror #3 and begins to participate…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The movie "12 angry Men" is about a jury who has the responsibility to decide whether a teenage is guilty of premeditate murder. At the beginning of the movie, the Judge speaks out to the jury saying that they must come out with a unanimous decision and that the jury has a "grave responsibility" because if found guilty, the boy will be condemn to electric chair. During the jury deliberation, we can identify and address the six steps of the group problem solving process and leadership. This process is really important because coming out with the solution like this one requires a very detail and cautious process.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Week 2 Application Assignment: Group Dynamics and Group Stages In 1965, Bruce Tuckman developed one of the most influential models of “the developmental stages in a small group” (Bonebright, 2010, p. 111). It is a four stage model in which each stage needed to be completed in order to reach optimum group functioning. These stages were dubbed “forming”, “storming”, “norming”, “performing”. Later in 1977, he and Mary Ann Conover Jensen added “adjourning” as a fifth stage in his model (Bonebright, 2010).…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The most obvious form of prejudice is racial prejudice, however, on a wider scale certain jurors showed their prejudice in the form of preconceived notions and irrational ideas. Gilovich asserts that the tendency is “for people’s preconceptions to bias their interpretations of what they see”. (1993.p15) Although the ethnic background of the defendant is never revealed, the reader is led to believe he is from a minority background. Juror ten is the most obvious example of someone who is racially prejudiced; he is immediately against the defendant because he is “one of them” and makes frequent references to “those people” he subsequently argues with juror five, also an inhabitant of the slums in an attempt to defend his statement that the boys slum background proves that he is “trash”.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror eight appealed to the jury’s values. He told a story about the innocent boy (innocent when he was young) being harmed as he was growing up. The boy was beaten by his dad when he was young. Juror eight did a tremendous job of appealing to the emotions of the others; as his approach changes the minds of the jurors. For example, Juror number nine says “this gentleman has been standing alone against us, he doesn’t say the boy isn’t guilty, he just isn’t sure” (12 angry men 1957).…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Accordingly the 5th jurors background aids him in making a wise decision. Ultimately, Rose has clearly explained that personal experience is an important aspect that influences the human decision-making processes. This is ascertained when the 3rd Juror’s agonizing experience with his son forces him to vote for guilty, the 9th juror’s old age grants him wisdom and insight and the 5th Juror’s life in a slum allows him to make a sound decision. Therefore personal experience is a very important factor that affects a person’s…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He is a leader which has ability to influence others person decision. He decision style is combination of directive and analytical. Juror 8 has forms alliance with juror 9, juror 11 and juror 2 which have ambiguous roles. His logical thinking and good team player able to guide the deliberations which other jurors agree with him. Establish good relationship and form a trust with jurors are one of the tactic of Juror 8 which able to change the results of the vote.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror #8 was the most compassionate and bravest for me. He insisted on his beliefs and evidence, and everyone was rude to him and tried to prove that he was wrong. He thinks the boy is innocent, he has given evidence, “El needs ten-seconds to pass a given point or two-seconds per car. According to the woman, El had been walking in front of the old man’s window for at least six-seconds before the body fell, and perhaps more. The old man had to hear the boy say, “I’m going to kill you,” roaring over his nose in front of El.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Juror eight has very good observation skills. He almost is a detective juror, he seeks answers and he is good at creating scenarios to find answers. Juror eight gave his reason why he had doubt still, and why the other eleven should look the case over more. Juror eight then wanted to take another vote. He agreed that after his points, if no one else votes none-guilty that he will agree with a guilty verdict also.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roles In Twelve Angry Men

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Juror nine is the old man with a quiet nature, but with an insightful remarks. He is the supporter-encourager of the group because he lets juror eight speak his mind without any judgement. Even though his votes were different than juror eight, the old man believes every person should have their opinions heard out especially a person like juror eight who is taking a stand on his own. Juror ten is the garage owner who has regular anger outburst like juror three the angry father.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Observe Juror #8 (Henry Fonda) as the leader. In the movie, Juror #8 is able to persuade his fellow jurors to change their opinions. Based on what you have learned in class, describe the leadership style he uses to do this. Present your analysis providing evidence from the film to support your position.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the main topics that was displayed in the movie was conformity. Conformity can be described as the act of changing one’s behavior to fit in with a group (Crutchfield, 1955). After the closing arguments of the trial, deliberations by the jurors begin on whether the boy is guilty or not. As the jurors make themselves comfortable in the jury room, casual exchanges are made between the jurors. This is where the first step of conformity takes place.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays