12 Angry Men Conformity Analysis

Improved Essays
One of the main topics that was displayed in the movie was conformity. Conformity can be described as the act of changing one’s behavior to fit in with a group (Crutchfield, 1955). After the closing arguments of the trial, deliberations by the jurors begin on whether the boy is guilty or not. As the jurors make themselves comfortable in the jury room, casual exchanges are made between the jurors. This is where the first step of conformity takes place. It is seen that juror #2 talks about how exhilarating it is to be on a murder trial to juror #3 who casually informs juror #2 that this isn’t his first time on a jury as well as his opinion about the whole case being a simple ‘open and close’ case. This small exchange sets the basis for a type …show more content…
The combining effect of these two incidents, gives off the illusion is that the group is all unanimous in the guilty vote. This symptom of group for group think also facilitate the reason behind the normative influence and informative influence that occurred during the voting, by claiming the group is in unanimous agreement, the jurors now think that if everyone agree then I should agree too because they either know something I don’t or I don’t want to be the only odd one out. By definition, conformity happens when we are placed in ambiguous or confusing situations, crisis situations or when other people are experts. During the first voting all but one of the 12 jurors voted not guilty. By juror #8 not going along with the group, he demonstrates the limits of conformity one of which is the sense of self. Juror #8 showed high self-esteem and leadership that help him to combat the pressure of conformity. After reaching a 11 to 1 vote, the other jurors are quick to criticise juror # 8 but he stands his ground and ask the group to think about the matter a bit more. A second voting takes place but this time by ballots. The results from the ballots show a second not guilty vote. The reason behind the second not guilty vote can be explain by the Ash line study (Ash,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He also does not have a lot of power in the room, which contributes to his guilty vote. When the foreman said, “All those voting “guilty” raise your hands,” Juror #2 immediately looks around the room and saw some hands raise and then raises his own hand (11). Because of his unassertive personality, he is vulnerable to the other juror’s opinions. Although he is extremely timid, he starts to gain his voice because he is starting to get tired of being pushed aside by Juror #3 and begins to participate…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He is racism, not proper thinker, abusive, prejudice, arrogant, insensitive and biased. Most of jurors doesn't like him based on his opinion and speech was disturbs the rest of juror. Changes his mind when all the others jurors are against him and specifically when jury 4 tells him to keep quite and not to speak. Juror 11 was interested to be a jury because he has witnessed great injustices that happen before. He was described as a good decision maker, rational thinker, supportive, team player, open-minded, agreeable and good natured.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the B A 321 textbook, facilitation is the set of activities carried out before, during, and after meetings to help a group achieve its own outcomes. A facilitator is someone who performs these activities, helping the team by monitoring and improving its internal process. Twelve Angry Men, a movie about an open-and-shut murder trial in which one juror stands alone in his beliefs, made use of facilitation. When the twelve jurors were sent to deliberate a unanimous verdict, the case was not as clear-cut as they once thought. The jurors were made up of twelve men of diverse backgrounds.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He has his opinion and is unwilling or unable to discuss with others. In our jury, The Angry One also exhibited these characteristics. The New juror came in the second to last day and had opinions but mostly kept quiet. The Quiet one did not do much talking except for voting. Every juror plays a distinct part in deciding the fate of the defendant, which showed during 12 Angry Men and during a personal jury when deciding whether or not OJ Simpson was…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Film Review If you are looking for a film that is heated, exciting, and exposes social justice, you might to watch the story of 12 Angry Men. This film is drama filled and will always keep you wondering what is going to happen next. I would recommend the film, 12 Angry Men, to viewers This film is excellent because of the strong use of character development, complex, but easy to follow plot, and proper use of film elements. The film revolves around 12 men serving on a jury to determine whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty for stabbing his father to death based on the premise of reasonable doubt. As Juror Number Eight develops reasonable doubt based on some logical errors of the witness statements, he uses logos to attempt…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Group culture impacts the dynamics of this group as they progress through Tuckman 's stages of development. While jurors share common values and beliefs about certain issues, the group is divided about others. Juror 3 for instance, believes that it is an open and shut case. He takes the matter quite seriously and is adamant that the defendant is guilty, which ten other jurors initially agree with him about. Juror 8 shares this seriousness by expressing concern about the weight of the decision and wants to discuss it in depth.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why would he lie? What’s he got to gain, Nine: Attention maybe?” Eight makes a good statement when saying that the Old man’s view doesn’t make sense due to the El train blocking his view and hearing. Nine tends to agree with Eight saying that the old ma In the beginning of the play almost every Juror in the room picks “Guilty” except for Juror Eight. He believes that the boy is “Not-Guilty” saying that the evidence is somewhat false. Of course the other Jurors don’t believe it.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    [Beginning with a quotation is a good introduction strategy. ☺]→ "The key to successful leadership today is influence, not authority” (Blanchard). ←[Be sure to proofread for errors such as omitted end punctuation.] “In Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, Juror eight will harness his issues to the other jurors to receive the verdict that he is coveting for. This juror is contemplative, meaning he will gather all the evidence and talk to his fellow jurors, combining thoughts to make an unanimous decision.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror eight did a tremendous job of appealing to the emotions of the others; as his approach changes the minds of the jurors. For example, Juror number nine says “this gentleman has been standing alone against us, he doesn’t say the boy isn’t guilty, he just isn’t sure” (12 angry men 1957). This statement by juror nine gives the viewers an understanding on how good juror eight appealed to the emotions of the others. He did not say that the boy wasn’t guilty; he provided evidence, and showed the others that there are possibilities that the boy did not kill his father. The discussion continues as they bring up the testimony of the witnesses of the murder.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On 12 Angry Men

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages

    12 Angry Men deals with the idea of a fair trial. The two sides in the deliberations of 12 Angry Men represent what had become the two sides in the American Justice System. The lone man that refuses to vote guilty, Juror 8, is the way of the people or the way as intended. The main man of the other side, Juror 3, represents what the justice system had become, a joke. During discussion Juror 3 points out that the kid is “guilty until proven innocent”, and that the kid had gotten a fair trial and cost the people a lot of money, which was “more than he…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays