Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
33 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Ethics in Milgram Study
|
-How far people would go under authority
- Women as lethal as men - 2/3 went all the way |
|
Agentic Shift
|
When you hand over authority to someone else
|
|
Research Ethics
|
- Respect right to privacy and dignity
- Objectivity and integrity - Protect from personal harm - Confidentiality - Informed consent - Disclose sources of financial support - Cultural Sensitivity |
|
Empirical Evidence
|
Information get from senses, if you can't observe with one of the five sense, we don't study it.
|
|
5 Ways of Knowing the World
|
1. Personal (discover for yourself)
2. Tradition (hold a belief) 3. Authority (expert tells us) 4. Religion (follow leaders/scriptures) 5. Science (controlled systematic observations) |
|
Scientific Method
|
1. Define problem
2. Review Literature 3. Formulate Hypothesis 4. Collect Data an Analyze it 5. Develop Conclusion |
|
Defining Problem
|
- State what you hope to investigate
- Operational definition (explain abstract concept so researcher can assess) |
|
Review of Literature
|
Scholarly studies relevant to subject
|
|
Formulating the Hypothesis
|
- "Best guess"
- Variable changing over conditions |
|
Causal Logic
|
Relationships between a variable and a particular consequence (cause and effect relationship)
|
|
Correlation
|
Two or more variables change together but not clear what causes what.
|
|
Spurious Correlation
|
Apparent, though false, relationship between two or more variables caused by some other variable.
|
|
Collecting and Analyzing Data
|
Selecting sample, decide based on population whom studying. Random sample crucial for generalizable data.
|
|
Validity
|
Degree of which a measure truly reflects the phenomenom being studied
|
|
Reliability
|
Extent to which a measure provides constant results (get same results over and over).
|
|
Developing the Conclusion
|
- support hypothesis or disprove it
- can never prove |
|
Interviews
|
- Face to face or telephone
- High response - Go beyond quesitonnaire |
|
Questionnaires
|
- Printed or written
- Inexpensive - Good for large samples |
|
Field Research
|
- Rely on what is seen in naturalistic settings
- Probe and participate - Small groups or communities - Not as number focused (not empirical) |
|
Participant Observation
|
- Ethnography (efforts to describe entire social setting through extended systematic observation).
- Keep distance |
|
In Depth Interviews
|
Uncover layers of meaning in responses
|
|
Semi-Structured
|
Specific questions but flexible enough to enable participants to direct their responses.
|
|
Unstructured
|
Open ended not confined to core set of questions, general aim.
|
|
Experimental Group
|
Exposed to independent variable (what interested in)
|
|
Control Group
|
Not exposed to independent variable to eliminate bias.
|
|
Hawthorne Effect
|
Reactivity to a stranger or researcher.
|
|
Secondary Analysis
|
Research techniques that make use of previously collected and publicly accessible information and data.
|
|
Content Analysis
|
Systematic coding and objective recording of data, guided by some rationale.
|
|
Deductive Approach
|
Theory based, researcher begins with theory and uses research to support it. Theory generates hypothesis.
|
|
Inductive Approach
|
Evidence based, researcher collects and analyzes data which leads to general theory which is turned into a hypothesis.
|
|
Replication
|
Repeating a study is difficult for participant observation.
|
|
Cross Sectional Research
|
Repeated over time, allows for greater causal modelling of theories.
|
|
4 Limitations of Sociology
|
- Social patterns change continuously
- Life in "test tube" - Harder to control bias - Make sure to recognize them and include in work |