Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
49 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
4 elements of waiting lines
|
Customer Population, service facility, priority rule, service system
|
|
customer population (4 elements of waiting lines)
|
an input that generates potential customers
|
|
service facility (4 elements of waiting lines)
|
a person(or crew), a machine (or group of machines), or both necessary to perform the services for the customer
|
|
priority rule (4 elements of waiting lines)
|
a rule that selects the next customer to be served by the service facility
|
|
service system (4 elements of waiting lines)
|
the number of lines and the arrangement of the facilities
|
|
customer population - Finite (Finite vs Infinite) 79
|
finite: few customer, small number
ex: jumbo 777 jets PP: FINITE Pool – Few potential customers. Every customer in the store significantly decreases the chance of another customer arriving. Example: Retail store that sells jumbo jet airplanes. |
|
customer population - Infinite (Finite vs Infinite) e79
|
thousands of potential customers
ex: mcdonalds PP: INFINITE Pool – Many potential customers. Odds barely affected by new arrivals. Example: McDonald’s (All our calculations should be assumed to be infinite pools.) |
|
customer population - (Finite vs Infinite)
|
prepared customers have all questions and answers ready or can take a long time; needy customers
ex: grandma |
|
Degree of Variability (M5PP)
|
Type of customers – Prepared/unprepared customer, Big/small orders, high/low maintenance customers, Paying cash vs. check
Arrival rates – Steady stream of customers? Busy and slow time periods? Busy and slow days of week? Seasonal trends? |
|
Customer Disposition: need for service/patience (M5PP)
|
Balking, Reneging, and Patient/Needy Customers
|
|
Waiting Lines (M5PP)
|
Number of lines (and number of servers)
Priority discipline rules Psychological Variables |
|
Number of lines (and number of servers) - (Waiting lines)
|
o Single lines
1st come 1st serve • Burger King (snake & swerve) o Multiple Lines Jumping lines, good lines, bad lines • Mcdonalds PP SINGLE LINE – 1st Come – 1st Served (FCFS), Sense of Fairness MULTIPLE LINES – Line Jumping or Jockeying? Bad/Good line? |
|
Priority Disciplines rules - who goes first? why? - (waiting lines)
|
Earliest due date/short processing time (homework)
Reservations: make schedule Emergency rooms: worst situation Preemptive discipline: vip lines, frequent flyers PP 1st Come – 1st Served (Burger King) Earliest Due Date or Shortest Processing Time (Homework?) Reservations or Appointments Possible? (Restaurants, Homework) Emergency Situations? (Emergency Rooms) Preemptive Discipline – Special Rules (VIP lines, Frequent Fliers) |
|
psychological variables - (waiting lines)
|
Un-cooperative customers
Employees not serving those in the line or that “look” slow Take a number, alternate numbering systems Free stuff, Televisions, Reading Material |
|
Servers (seve)
|
Human resource issues
service rates: who controls the speed? |
|
Human resource issues (Servers) (seve)
|
Hiring the right people
Hiring enough people Scheduling/flexibility Prepare them for the job, specialist/generalists |
|
Service rates: who controls the speed? (servers) (seve)
|
Motivated & happy
Add/take away servers Effect on customers |
|
Service facility characteristics (seve)
|
o Well designed process
o Equipment and technology o Facilities layout design o Laid out: easier for workers use Bartending (easy to reach everything at once) |
|
Queuing Notation (seve)
|
o λ: mean arrival
how quickly customers arrive o µ: mean service rate how quickly customers are helped |
|
Rates: number per hour (#/hr) (seve)
|
Numerator: customers, cars, repots, etc.
Denominator: seconds, minutes, months, years, etc. EX: 3 customers served per hour • 3 customers/1hr…3/hr=.05customers/min |
|
Service factor (seve)
|
p=λ/µ = % of the time a server is busy
|
|
Queuing metrics (seve)
|
ns: avg # of customers in a system
ts: avg tome spent in a system nl: avg length of queue tl: acg time spent in a queue n=number of customers, t=time, l=line/queue s=system |
|
Queuing probabilities (seve)
|
p(little n)=(1-p)pn=probability of exactly “n” customers in the system
1 server helping 1 customer: if r=.7, p4=(1-.7).7=.072=7.2% 7.2% chance of that scenario occurring 70% of the time they are busy |
|
waiting in line (seve)
|
o channels, priority discipline, arrival/service rates
o process & facility design o organizational goals o understanding the customer, different types of customers o comforting the customer o call centers ex: Walmart vs Autorepair vs movie theatres vs airport |
|
facility considerations (seve)
|
o balancing space
o backroom vs front office/retail area o parking, receiving, waiting areas, storage o Product specialty center layout and plannograms o customer sales concerns o security o 5 Senses o Facilitating goods: items that need to be kept in inventory at all ties to maintain operations |
|
(VMI) vendor managed inventory (seve)
|
o VMI: inventory planning and replenishment system where the supplier or vendor accepts negotiated responsibilities that typically include monitoring and restocking
What is the value to the vender and the retailer? focus on the end customer understand partner’s needs o Retailer: few responsibilities including decreasing costs o Vendor: better understanding of demand rates o Challenges o Goal alignment: vendor, retailer, customer o Process related: different ways of achieving the same task o schedule related: when should things get done o Performance and quality related: metrics, motivation, discipline, reliability, consistency o IT compatibility, sharing concerns o People related: everyone must buy-in, culture clashes, equity issues |
|
Avoiding Waste: resource management (seve)
|
o Prevent shrinkage
o Focus on materials & energy management inventory in stock & on floor electric, water, fuel facility size and design appearance vs functionality satisfied workforce managing customer contacts/touches |
|
Lean Manufacturing (seve)
|
o no two companies use the exact ame practice
o typically pull oriented o goals a) minimize inventory b) eliminate 7 types of waste |
|
Push/pull systems (seve)
|
o pull: dell computers best (mail it to you)
a) Pros: low inventories, demand driven system, flexible manufacturing, closer supplier ties developed b) cons: low inventories, risky customer servie rates, tougher sell, hard to troubleshoot (high cost/high performance) o Push: sony (buy at the store) a) pros: high inventories, shorter lead times, mistakes and defects tolerance b) cons: high inventories, low customization, makes mistakes seem less important to employees, foreasting miscalculations can be very costly |
|
JIT philosophy (seve)
|
o Only have what you need
o quality at the source: rather than wait for final inspection, assure that quality is built in at every stage of the process o high performance quality: must outperform push competitor offerings o consistant quality o preventative maintenance: avoid downtime o Continuous improvement: maintain competitive edge o Well designed layouts: avoid bottlenecks o goals a) short cycle times, high quality, low defects, control costs o Reduce set-up times when changing from manufacturing one product to another o Employees a) must be welleducated and empowered b) easy to learn systems c) must have consistent quality and fast speed/capacity, reducing per unit costs • Reason Dell was successful o tended to all factors of the fast moving technology |
|
SCM goals/tradeoffs (seve)
|
o time
a) amount of automation? b) maximum output/capacity required? c) line balancing, bottlenecks, lead times o flexability a) volume flexability vs customization flexibility b) postponement? o quality a) consistancy and high performance due to proper training and automation b) Jidoka: everyone is responsible for quality o Cost a) inventory, defects, loss, damage, labor, facilities, packaging, product service/support system |
|
Risk Pooling (seve)
|
(sq root of “warehouses planned” X “stock present system” = “stock neededproposed system”)/sq root of “present # of warehouses”
o allows you to see how much inventory will be required to maintain similar stockout rates when changing the # of warehouses o used when market demand is difficult to predict o pro-centralization: lower required stock decreases warehouse operating costs o con-centralization: distance/responsiveness, transportation costs |
|
bullwhip effect (seve)
|
o very high and verylow supply levels, despite consistant demand levels
o Reasons and results a) poor forecasting b) order batching: placement of large orders c) price fluctuations d) rationing: demand higher than supply e) shortage gaming: retailers inflate ordersizes to counteract rationing |
|
Challenges of bullwhip effect? (seve)
|
o Planning and strategy
bullwhip effect manufacturing: overproduction, quality, capacity measuring: lack of important data, poor analysis o Operations Management shrinkage resources: wrong people with lack of expertise and motivation purchasing proper efficient equipment purchasing quanties and qualities logistics o Third Party Issues unreliable, less motivated for high performance outsourcing decreases your control of overall strategy including quality external bariers: laws, taxes, fraud of 3rd party company |
|
Supply Chain Integration (seve)
|
• # of systems that have to work together or one error will ruin it all
• Goals/responsibilities o meet customer demand: make the customer happy o contribute to profitability: buy good parts at low costs o continuous improvement a) paranoid lifestyle: will they want better tomorrow? • upstream: in direction of suppliers • Downstream: direction of customer • Backend: out of sight to customers, things in your organization they cannot see and are unaware of • forend: things the customers can see |
|
Global Sourcing reasons (seve)
|
• Firms go global to simply make money
• Reasons to go abroad o Growth opportunities: new markets, managing risk, understanding markets and trends o Cost reductions: cheap labor and resources, tax benefits, leads to better understanding of market trends, gain new ideas from other cultures’ operations • Companies entering a country can also bring risk upon the industry of that company o EX: heart transplant from marathon runner |
|
X-Box example (seve)
|
o Electric Manufacturing Services Industry
Companies can take on numerous primary supply chain responsibilities associated with the manufacturing of electronic components assembled end lines Exploit economies of scale in the manufacturing of electronic devices Similar parts, processes, designs, techniques, channels of distribution o Commodity parts: Flextronics orders and purchases o Some Custom Parts: Microsoft negotiated, Flextronics controlled o Special/critical parts: Microsoft purchased, delivered to Flextronics |
|
Euro vs Dollar (seve)
|
• Euro vs Dollar: exchange rate hit the 2004 VW hard in Europe due to extreme fluctuations
o In the US, however, rates were much more stable, and trends showed this pattern was going to continue, so VW focused on targeting the US much more • In previous decades, computers, cameras, phones, radios, etc were all made with relatively different technology, and looked much different too o Now, cameras, computers, cellphones etc use much of the same technology. While appearances of the final product still differ, they still look much more alike eachother then they used to, and now many of these items can be combined into one product iphone with internet capabilities, built in camera, and apps that play the radio, all built with the same sort of technology |
|
Captive outsourcing OR offshoring (m7pp)
|
low cost- labor, resources, energy, taxes, tariffs, fines...
prodimity to customers lead times logistics costs market responsiveness infrastructure/channels of distribution proximity to suppliers lead times and costs - materials, labor, energy supplier relationships - research, design, development pursuing a Hedging Strategy - minimize effects of currency fluctuations |
|
outsourcing 132
|
the procurement of selected value-adding activities, including production of intermediate goods or finished products, from independent suppliers
|
|
business process outsourcing (BPO) 132
|
the outsourcing of business functions to independent suppliers, such as accounting, payroll, human resource functions, IT services, customer service, and technical support
|
|
Captive sourcing 133
|
sourcing from the firm's own production facilities located abroad
|
|
configuration of value-adding activity 133
|
the pattern or geographic arrangement of locations where the firm carries out value-chain activities
|
|
Global sourcing 130
|
the procurement of products or services fro independent suppliers or company-owned subsidiaries located abroad for consumption in the home country or a third county
|
|
contract manufacturing 134
|
an arrangement in which the focal firm contracts with an independent supplier to manufacture products according to well-defined specifications
|
|
offshoring 135
|
the relocation of a business process or entire manufacturing facility to a foreign country
|
|
benefits of global sourcing 141
|
cost efficiency - improved bottom line profitability
strategic benefits - faster corporate growth access to qualified personnel abroad improved productivity and service business process redesign increased speed to market access to new markets technological flexibility improved agility by shedding unnecessary overhead |
|
challenges to global sourcing 141
|
vulnerability to exchange rate flucutations
parner selection, qualification, and monitoring costs increased complexity of managing a worldwide network of production locations and partners complexity of managing global supply chain limited influence over the manufacturing processes of the supplier potential vulnerability to opportunistic behavior or actions in bad faith by suppliers constrained ability to safeguard intellectual assets |
|
# global supply chain 143
|
the firm's integrated network of sourcing, production, and distribution, organized on a worldwide scale and located in countries where competitive advantage can be maximized
|