• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/27

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

27 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Nemo iudex in causa sua

Latin phrase - no man should be a judge in his own cause

Orange Communications Ltd v Director of Telecoms (No.2)

Definition of bias: "...any relationship, interest or attitude which actually did influence or might be perceived to have influenced a decision..."

O'Ceallaigh v An Bord Altranais

The fact that the Chairman of the Board and the independent expert witness had worked in the same hospital was not sufficient to give rise to an apprehension of bias - an extra "element or factor was required

Dimes v Grand Junction Canal

Decision set aside because Lord Chancellor held a substantial number of shares in the defendant company

People (AG) v Singer

CCA ordered a retrial on a fraud charge because the foreman of the jury had been an investor in the company

Doyle v Croke

Strike Committee's division of settlement payment to employees who had "adequately performed picket duties" was invalid because they had a financial interest as former employees

Dublin & County Broadcasting v IRTC

Although Committee member had a legal right in shares in a company which successfully obtained a broadcasting contract, there was no bias because he had previously sought to divest them and believed he had done so

Goode Concrete v CRH plc

At the start of trial, Cooke J stated that he may have held some shares in the defendant's company in his pension fund - further shares were purchased on his behalf later. SC ruled that this gave rise to objective bias

R v Gough

House of Lords stated the automatic disqualification principle where the judge is a party to the cause or has a relevant interest

R v Bow Street Magistrates ex parte Pinochet

House of Lords set aside its decision to extradite a Chilean dictator because one of the judges had been a director of Amnesty International and as such a party to the cause

R (Donoghue) v Cork County JJ

Magistrate stated after case that he would not leave any member of the accused's family in the district - conviction quashed based on personal attitude

R (Kingston) v Cork County JJ

Evicted farmer brought assault charges against purchaser. The fact that the Magistrate's Bench contained 2 members of the Land League which had organised rent boycott meant that decision had to be set aside for bias

State (Fagan) v Governor Mountjoy Prison

McMahon J stated that if the Deputy Governor had witnessed the incident in question, he may have formed an impression of the facts as distinct from the evidence given at the inquiry

O'Reilly v Judge Cassidy (No.1)

Circuit Court judge was father of counsel for one of the parties - Finlay CJ ruled that as long as there was not objection, the case could continue to be heard

Emerald Supplies v British Airways

Judge used case to personally critique British Airways procedures and was forced to recuse himself

Heneghan v Western Regional Fisheries Board

Dismissal of a fisheries inspector was set aside because main disciplinary had acted as witness, judge, jury and appeal

O'Callaghan v Disciplinary Tribunal

The same person sat at both the prima facie and substantive stages of the Solicitor's Disciplinary Tribunal, however there was no bias because the nature of the decision was different

Tomilson v Criminal Injuries Compensation Tribunal

Award included a deduction based on insurance benefits received but this was a pre-judgment and set aside

S.24 Courts of Justice Act 1924

Prohibits judges from sitting as a member of the court of appeal where he previously presided over the case

Kelly v Visitors of Trinity College

The fact that the Professor had an obligation to vindicate the best interests of the college did not make it likely that she would favour a member of staff over a student

Dublin Well Woman Centre v Ireland

SC found apparent bias where Carroll J heard the application despite being Chairwoman of the Commission for the Status on Women and having written a submission to the government regarding the availability of abortion information

Bula Ltd v Tara Mines Ltd

Application to have SC decision set aside because two SC members had previously given legal advise to one of the parties.


Denham J: test for apparent bias is whether the reasonable person would have a reasonable apprehension in the circumstances


McGuiness J: cogent and rational link between association and influence - no such link in the case

Kenny v Trinity College Dublin

The fact that a central witness was an architectural firm in which one of the judge's brother's was a partner raised a reasonable apprehension of bias. Denham J's test in Bula was applied.

Keegan v Judge Kilrane

Judge had previously represented the party on a number of occasions in relation to similar offences. Legal professional privilege enables a legal representative to gain greater insight into a party, and so they should not act as judge at a later date.

O'Neill v Beaumont Hospital Board

Members of board had been involved in negotiations prior to decision - by necessity, only the "most tainted" board members had to be removed

Corrigan v Irish Land Commission

Although the same Land Commissioner had certified a compulsory purchase order and upheld it on appeal, the plaintiff was "well aware" and so had waived his right to claim bias

O'Neill v Irish Hereford Breed Society

Although plaintiff had legal representation, he was not "well aware" of all relevant circumstances in waiving right to claim bias