Advantages And Disadvantages Of The Literal Rule

Improved Essays
The literal rule is one way in which statues are interpreted. The courts do not subvert the law but just apply the law that is created by parliament. This rule gives all words their ordinary meaning and must be followed even if the result is absurd. In the case R v city of London Court Judge Lord Esher stated if the word of an act is clear then you must follow them even if it manifestly leads to an absurd result . Highlighting the absurdity of the literal rule Berriman a railway worker died hit by a train whilst oiling the tracks. Statute says that compensation payable on death to those relaying or repairing track but nothing about oiling tracks, so the court decided that victims claim could not have compensation as he was not doing anything …show more content…
The courts have a restricted role therefore cannot give their opinion so there is no bias. Thirdly, law making is left to those who elected so is constitutionally sound from our perspective. However, disadvantages include the absurd result not enacting the will of parliament, for example in the case of Berriman (1946) it was not parliaments intention not to allow someone who was killed by a train not to have compensation. The law commission report states that the literal rule assumed ‘an unattainable perfection in draftmanship’, and ‘ignores the limitations of language, Thus, ‘not infrequently’’ even the house of lords have differed over the ‘so-called “plain meaning” of …show more content…
Despite this there is no clear meaning of what an absurd result is, therefore subjective as what may be absurd to one may be different to another. For example, in the R v Allen case, Allen would have thought being found guilty of bigamy was an absurd result. Furthermore, this rule could not be used in cases like Berriman as it was not absurd enough despite being unfair. The golden rule is also unpredictable as how can you follow word of statute if judges can change it to suit the requirements at the time. Lastly, it lacks guidelines as there is no criteria that judges need to follow apart from the fact it avoids an absurd result. What the law commission report had to say about the golden rule is that it sets a ‘purely negative standard, by reference to absurdity, inconsistency, or inconvenience, but provides no clear means to test the existence of these characteristics or to measure their quality or extent’. This means we are looking at the failing of parliament where they would have got the wording

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Caldwell further alleges that there was insufficient evidence to sustain a conviction for the offense of conspiracy to commit burglary of the Alkaline Water Company. The State, for its part, avers that Caldwell’s argument is waived because the issue was never presented to the trial court. Caldwell acknowledges that the issue as to whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain his conviction was not raised before the trial court. Nevertheless, Caldwell asserts that we should engage in plain error review and reverse the conviction. Alternatively, Caldwell contends that review of this sufficiency claim is proper because Caldwell’s trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence before the trial court.…

    • 1873 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    George Berkeley argues that an objective reality does not exist. He argues for idealism, the belief that the external world does not exist and only the mind and ideas do, by arguing against materialism, that an objective reality does exist. Berkeley believes that an objective reality does not exist because of issues that come with materialism. However, his points do not make much sense as he relies on faulty ideas. He presents his argument by mentioning how materialism is unverifiable; that we cannot verify there is an objective reality, pointless; there is no need to posit an external world, and incoherent; our senses cannot be external objects.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If determinism is true, then persons cannot be held morally responsible for their actions as they did not have any choice in them. Another common belief is that of indeterminism, which is the idea that perhaps not all actions are based on previous states of affairs or events. If this is true, then actions not based on previous states of affairs or events are uncaused and therefore are purely by chance. Thus, persons who commit an action by chance cannot be held morally responsible for their actions. In both situations, deterministic and indeterministic, free will plays no part and therefore anyone who commits an act should not be held morally responsible.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, I do not think that there needs to be a common power or written law for a person to feel that there was an injustice done against them. For example, there is no written law saying that you can’t speak over someone else who is already speaking, it’s just simply considered being rude. But, if you are the individual who has something to say and another person talks over you then you may feel that an injustice was done against you because you didn’t get to say what you wanted to say. And you may feel like an even greater injustice was done if you felt that what you had to say was very important. To expand upon this idea, the person who spoke over you may have done so without realizing it and doesn’t have any mal intent towards you (although this doesn’t negate the fact that you feel like this wasn’t a just situation).…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Laws Of Nature

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Even though, the sovereign is devoid from accountability and licensed in action, unrestrained morally or legally, by allowing the subjects to retain an inalienable right, Hobbes has given the subjects a measure by which to evaluate the capabilities of the sovereign. Therefore, the lack of an institutional mechanism to bind the sovereign to abide by the laws of nature coupled with the subjects’ right of self-defence might lead to instances of rebellion, though prohibited and unjustifiable, would not be prevented and even provoked. Since the goal of the commonwealth must ensure the means for self-preservation, Hobbes broadens the concept of self-defence to incorporate normative, reputational, psychological, and corporal precautions. Hence, even though he is advocating for an indivisible, undivided, and unlimited sovereignty, he inadvertently allows the subjects to make private judgements about whether the commands of the sovereign endanger their wellbeing. This translates into a…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ultratra Vires Case Study

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    They do not have any legal effect so as to cause any adversity to innocent persons who are not aware with the ability of the company to enter into such contract. The observation made by the court in the landmark case of Ashbury Railway Carriage & Iron Co. V Riche , laid down that an ultra vires contract is void- ab-initio which cannot turn into intra vires by any reason of estoppels, lapse of time, delay or acquiescence. The inability of the company to make any contract has sometimes caused great injustice and hardships to the people who had no knowledge of such incapacity of the company. In the case of Beauforte (Jon) London, Ltd. Re : Jon Beauforte Ltd., company, by its memorandum of association was authorized to practice the business of costumes, gown, robe, dress and mantle makers, tailors and other activities of similar nature. But later on the directors of the company decided to practice on the business of manufacturing veneered panels, which was clearly ultra vires the objective clause of the company.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It thus suggests that this is yet another reason for the rating system not working. This is again a very weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not demonstrate any correlation between the monetary amount of the fines and the quality of the electronic game rating system. In fact, the argument does not even draw a parallel with the mentioned movie rating system and its violation fines. If any such correlation had been shown for the movie rating system, which supposedly works well, then the author would have sounded a bit more convincing. In addition, if the argument provided evidence that low violation fines lead to electronic game manufacturers to ignore any regulations with respect to the game rating system, the argument could have been strengthened even…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However the eligibility for judicial review can at times be confusing. For example, if a public body were to issue a general statement or policy that a person disagreed with, but it had not affected said person, usually they cannot apply for judicial review. This demonstrated in the case of R v Secretary of State for Education of Skills where a challenge to the lawfulness of a general statement issued by the Department of Education and Skills was rejected due to there being nothing unlawful in the toolkit that affected the claimants. Nevertheless in R v GMC the claimant’s care for his degenerative condition was withdrawn due to him not needing assistance at that time, however it was inevitable that he would have needed care eventually. His application for judicial review was allowed but it was noted by the Court of Appeal that this was a very rare.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is not right as a rule meant to deter law enforcer conduct is not what the society wants. However, instead, the Exclusionary Rules lets the law enforcers go right up to this line, without any repercussions fears in case they cross it by mistake. All the rule fails to take away the evidence they obtain from crossing the line in such a situation. It merely excludes what the officers should not have done in the first place. The rule has no deterrent effect on the officers personally and only acts as an incentive in collecting evidence lawfully when they want to make sure that its used during the trial.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although this does not necessary imply that welfare is a negative service, it is however, unconstitutional. Hence, the Founding Fathers would most likely disprove of…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays