• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/18

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

18 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Identify five traditional organizational structures.
1. Simple
2. Functional
3. Divisional
4. Strategic Business Unit
5. Holding Company
Identify the pros and cons of the "Holding Company" organizational structures.
○ Pro's: Cost savings.
○ Con's: Corporate office is dependent on each business unit's management team. lack of control over the decisions of those managers.
Identify the pros and cons of the "Strategic Business Unit" organizational structures.
○ Pro's: Rapid response, closer proximity to development and implementation, CEO can make broader decisions, focused accountability, Functional specialization within each division, good management training, good focus on products and markets, quick response to change.
○ Con's: Potential competition for resources, deciding level of authority for managers, potential policy inconsistencies among divisions, distribution of costs, increased cost via duplicate functions, difficulty maintaining overall corporate image.
Identify the pros and cons of the "Divisional" organizational structures.
○ Pro's: Efficient, expertise, centralized control of decisions.
○ Con's: Narrow specialization, functional rivalry and conflict, difficult functional coordination, limited development of managers, may cost more.
Identify the pros and cons of the "Functional" organizational structures.
○ Pro's: Higher focus on work.
○ Con's: Need effective coordination of the functional units. Potential of conflict between units.
Identify the pros and cons of the "Simple" organizational structures.
○ Pro's: Allows rapid response to market shifts. Ability to accommodate. Encourage employee multitasking.
○ Con's: Demanding on the owner. May miss strategic issues. May limit future development.
Describe the product-team structure.
○ Assigns functional managers and specialists to a new product, project, or process team that is empowered to make major decisions about their product.
○ Team members are assigned permanently in most cases.
Explain why the product-team structure is a prototype for a more open, agile organizational structure.
Team members are assigned permanently, which can reduce cost while speeding up innovation and responsiveness.
Explain five ways improvements have been sought in traditional organizational structures.
1. Redefining the role of corporate headquarters.
2. Rebalancing the need for control versus coordination.
3. Adjusting and reengineering the structure to emphasize strategic activities.
4. Downsizing.
5. Moving toward self-managing operational activities
Describe what is meant by agile, virtual organizations.
Identifies a set of business capabilities central to high-profitability operations and then builds a virtual organization around those capabilities, allowing the agile firm to build its business around the core, high-profitability information, services, and products.
Pros and cons of outsourcing.
Pros:
○ It can lower costs incurred when the activity outsourced is done in-house.
○ It can reduce the amount of capital a firm must invest in production or service capacity.
○ The firm’s managers and personnel can concentrate on mission-critical activities.
○ This concentration and focus allow the firm to control and enhance the source of its core competitive advantage.
○ More expertise.

Cons:
○ Outsourcing involves loss of some control and reliance on “outsiders.”
○ Outsourcing can create future competitors.
○ Skills important to a product or service are “lost.”
○ Outsourcing may cause negative reaction from the public and investors.
○ Crafting good legal agreements, especially for services, is difficult.
○ The company may get locked into long-term contracts at costs that are no longer competitive.
○ Cost aren’t everything: What if my supplier underbids?
○ Outsourcing can lead to increasingly fragmented work cultures where low-paid workers get the work done with little initiative
Describe boundaryless organizations and why they are important.
absence of internal and external “boundaries” between units, levels, and locations that lessen their company’s ability to generate knowledge, share knowledge, and get knowledge to the places it can be best used to create value.
Explain why organizations of the future need to be ambidextrous learning organizations.
It's where the money is.
Define "Simple" organizational structure.
There is an owner and a few employees and where the arrangement of tasks, responsibilities, and communication is highly informal and accomplished through direct supervision.
Define "Functional" organizational structure.
the tasks, people, and technologies necessary to do The work of the business are divided into separate “functional” groups (e.g., marketing, operations, finance) with increasingly formal procedures for coordinating and integrating their activities to provide the business’s products and services.
Define "Divisional" organizational structure
A set of relatively autonomous units, or divisions, are governed by a central corporate office but where each operating division has its own functional specialists who provide products or services different from those of other divisions.
Define "Strategic Business Unit" organizational structure.
An adaptation of the divisional structure in which various divisions or parts of divisions are grouped together based on some common strategic elements, usually linked to distinct product/market differences.
Define "Holding Company" organizational structure.
The corporate entity is a broad collection of often unrelated businesses and divisions such that it (the corporate entity) acts as financial overseer “holding” the ownership interest in the various parts of the company, but has little direct managerial involvement.