The main theme in recent foreign policies is “stability through détente.” Stability can be achieved through a new structure of relations: presumably a multipolar balance of power. A multipolar balance of power is potentially more stable than bipolar balance this is because the number of interactions in a multiple relationship among foreign nations is greater than in a bipolar relationship.(More nations are working in conjunction with each other and are focusing outside their hostility to solve world issues regarding a particular country.) This reduces the dangers which come from mutually reinforcing antagonisms typical of a bipolar dyadic relationship. In a multipolar set of relationships there will not be a zero-sum game, action by one will not require an equal offsetting response by the other. Instead of the mutual reinforcement of hostility, which often comes from a dyadic relationship, there may be the dissipation of hostility because the number of interactions is greater. For instance, both the Soviet Union and the United States are now diverting more attention toward Communist China, an “emerging nuclear power.” Thus, the share of attention the Soviets and the Americans devote to one another must of necessity …show more content…
Ultimately, I have come to a conclusion and realized that redundant America does not reciprocate the international attention it gets back to the countries who are following it like sheep. I am a typical college freshman with an open mind and I am one with liberal views on world politics. However, I think that America needs to look back to its “founding father days” and analyze how it developed and advanced through the help and teachings of her supportive countries. We, as U.S., citizens are the most influential people around the world. Similar nations look up to us as a model for supporting, governing, and entertaining for their lifestyles and cultures. To solve our socio- economic problems, it is necessary that we look back at our following countries and learn from