Pros And Cons Of A Moral Saint

Great Essays
1. Wolf thinks one should not aim to be as morally good as possible because one does not pursue non-moral virtues and is not well-rounded. To be a moral saint, one lives by their moral virtues at the cost of not cultivating any non-moral virtues. A moral saint is one who acts as morally good as possible. In order to be a moral saint, one permits all moral virtues and inhibits non-moral virtues. Examples of moral virtues are; being considerate, courageous, and just. Whereas non-moral virtues include; appreciating humor, refined intellectual, artistic, and physical abilities. Wolf believes that in order to be a moral saint you must give up your desire to pursue non-moral virtues, which is not good. We should not live our lives dedicating them to morality, instead we should aim to be well-rounded and pursue both moral and non-moral virtues. One cannot be both a moral saint and well-rounded. Therefore, Wolf believes the life of a moral saint is undesirable because the moral saint does not have the ability to live an enjoyable and well-rounded life.

2. The first cause argument for g-d states that reality is one large sequence of causes, any
…show more content…
Credibility is more than truth telling, it presupposes that we care about the truth. Liars care about the truth and bullshitters do not. Bullshitters intentionally deceive people. Even if their credibility is not damaged, their disregard for the truth can be more detrimental. For example, social media constantly provides the general public with bullshit and misrepresents current events. This misrepresentation convinces the public to believe something that is skewed and altered to attract viewers. People still believe social media and believe it is reliable even though it is bullshit. Frankfurt would believe the disregard for the truth is more damaging than credibility, therefore bullshitting is worse than

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    When most people hear the term “moral saint,” they think of the common “goody-good” or a “perfect child”. As defined by Susan Wolf in her essay “Moral Saints”, a moral saint is a person whose happiness “lie[s] in the happiness of others, and so he would devote himself to others gladly, and with a whole and open heart”. Although this may seem like a normal and amiable trait, the entire meaning is to consume oneself in the advancement of others out of pure altruism while simultaneously to ignore the improvement of oneself and to forgo enjoyment of all forms. Moral saints put others first in all aspects of life and their sole purpose in life is to serve others. They do not attempt to improve their own lives or to indulge in any form of recreation,…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A bullshitter does not care about these things. The only thing that matters to the bullshitter is being able to get away with not telling the truth. When someone lies, they always have to keep one eye on the truth so that they can continue to avoid it. A bullshitter, on the other hand, does not focus on keeping up with the truth because they have zero regard for the person who they are bullshitting. 2.…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Susan Wolf's Moral Saint

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Susan Wolf describes the moral saint as the person whose every action is as morally good as it can be. Wolf summaries’ from this that a Kantian and utilitarian moral saint would be ‘unpleasant and possibly disturbed psychological type’. Throughout essay I will be breaking down this statement, and looking at the qualities of a Kantian moral saint and a Utilitarian moral saint, to see the validity of Wolf’s statement. My personal opinion on Wolf’s argument is to agree with her statement but to understand her argument one must understand what a moral saint is, as it is possible for a divide to come between good motives and good actions between good and honorable character and the ability to perform good actions.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A virtuous person reads as one who shows high moral standards. The nature of virtue dates back to aristotle. Aristotle, one of the most known and respected philosophers stated that virtue is an essential element to the good life. Aristotle praises virtue as being the way one should choose to be in life. The novel The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini uses moral development and virtuous actions frequently.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In her writing on Moral Saints, Susan Wolf presents the idea of morally perfect beings, that is, hypothetical (or potentially existent along some contemporary moral theories) individuals who’s lives are dominated by acts of moral worth. Her argument goes over their compatibility with popular moral theories such as Utilitarianism and Kantianism, then expresses the unattractiveness of such an individual as an ideal. In this paper I will first briefly define moral saints and their characteristics, pointing out that which Wolf finds unattractive or unrealistic. Next, I will argue that her conclusions regarding how people are likely to approach the idea of a moral saint have merit, but only in-so-far as her approach to moral saints, in general,…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many philosophers and people around the world believe that being a moral saint, is something that should be a desirable goal for human beings. In an excerpt from The Journal of Philosophy, on page 116 of the textbook, the author, Susan Wolf, a Professor of Philosophy at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, defines a moral saint as a person whose every action is as morally good as possible, and a person who is as morally worthy as can be. Wolf however, believes that moral saintliness, does not establish a model of personal well-being and shouldn’t be something that a human being desires or strives to become. The conclusion of Susan Wolf’s main argument in the article is that the Loving Saint, and the Rational Saint will lack, and/or…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Aquinas Argument

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Thomas Aquinas, 5 ways to prove the existence of God, I will look his second way “Efficient Cause.” In this proof, Aquinas states that everything is caused or created by other things. He states that every effect has a cause and that cause is an effect of another cause, and so on and so forth. An example to help explain his argument is a coffee table.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Does moral code defines the goodness of an individual? In “A Good Man is Hard to Find”, Flannery O'Connor creates two characters that commit to different moral code in their lives. Moral code is a set of beliefs and behaviors that one agree are reasonable and live with. It affects a person's decision, action, and perception toward anything. It can be formed by the environment, religion, or culture that a person live in.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an effort to argue for the existence of God, Saint Thomas Aquinas provides five cosmological arguments in his piece “The Existence of God”. The second argument he states examines causes and effects and looks to explain these series in regard to their beginning, or first cause (43:1-2). Aquinas says that the chain of causes and effects cannot go back to “infinity” (43:60) because when the first cause is taken out, so is its effect and every following effect (43:61). I find this claim plausible because this would mean that there would be no “caused” things in existence. Aquinas follows to say that “there obviously are such causes” (43:62) in existence, so the first cause must not have been taken away.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, I would agree with the virtue ethicists more because a good person would obviously possess a good character. In order to be truly good, a person must live a good life by adhering to their personal values and values that are commonly known to be virtues. When determining who is good and who is not good, you without a doubt, have to look at that person’s character. A person with good values is in turn, a good person and a person with bad values is, in a bad…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lucas Shaw Short paper #1 Philosophy, Topic #2 Cosmological argument for the existence of God. Cosmological argument: An argument (or set of arguments) that undertakes to “prove” that God exists on the basis of the idea that there must have been a first cause or an ultimate reason for the existence of the universe (Introducing Philosophy, pg 661). This is the definition of this argument according to this particular book.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Existence of God This argument about the existence of God, better known as the cosmological argument, begins with the late philosopher Aristotle. Similar to a modern day natural scientist, he believed that we could ascertain more about the world and the very fundamental nature of things within our world just by observing and recording. In many ways Aristotle resemble a modern day artist, a person who goes through life experiencing and watching all different types of energy that’s around, visually records this information and help others by spreading this knowledge to the mass. Aristotle too, would look and study the world and its patterns that were around him in order to gain insight into his world.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before I explain that, I am going to tell you what is cosmological argument. The cosmological Argument (Greek "cosmos"= orderly whole): a posterior, deductive. "god" is the "first (uncaused) cause "of the cosmos. it is deductive, so it is a candidate for soundness. Then the cosmological argument is the argument that the existence of the world or universe is strong evidence for the existence of a God who created it.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The following paper argues in favor of Aristotle’s virtue ethics over Kantian deontology. In Kantian deontology, to be ethical is to follow one’s duty by acting on only the rules which one can at the same time rationally will that those actions become universal laws, while in Aristotelian virtue ethics, to be ethical is to develop and internalize virtuous habits until one fully becomes virtuous themselves. In turn, the ethical question of ‘What should I do?’ that deontology asks becomes ‘What should I be?’ with virtue ethics, placing emphasis on internal motivations rather than external actions.…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Causality is the structure of cause and effect, the relationship completely. For A must come before B, A being the cause and B the effect. This is one of the necessary conditions that need to be met, for causation to be applicable. At least three, need to be met altogether, such as temporal priority over cause and effect, and continuity. These conditions also have to happen at the same time, or it is not credible.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays