Compare And Contrast Virtue Ethics And Virtue Ethicism

Superior Essays
Register to read the introduction… Virtue ethics starts with the question, “What makes for a good, or excellent, person?” They answer the question by arguing that being a good person is about having a good character. A character is a set of dispositions and those who have a good character are naturally disposed to do good things. It is believed that those with good characters are “virtuous” and that good character traits are virtues, while bad character traits are vices. According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, a virtue is a good and moral quality (2013). Virtue ethics actually dates back to the days of Aristotle (Rachels, p 158).” Aristotle definition of a virtue was, “a trait of character manifested in habitual action (Rachels, p 160).” Some examples of human virtues include honesty, self-control, compassion, generosity, patience and loyalty.
Virtue ethics is more about the decisions a person makes based on their character, as opposed to just making decisions based on laws and customs. It falls under the category of normative ethics, which is opposed to deontology, including Kantianism. While deontologists focus primarily on duty and obligation, virtue ethicists focus more on how one’s character affects their behavior. Aristotle believed that a virtuous person would fare better in life that a person who has lived a life of vice (Rachels,
…show more content…
Virtue ethicists try to encourage us to “stop thinking about obligation, duty, and rightness (Rachels, p 159).” Both Kantians and virtue ethicists provide very valid arguments about what it takes for a person to be good. In my personal opinion, when creating the image of a good person, I believe that there are some aspects from both points of view that would apply. I agree with Kant in the sense being a good person has a lot to do with doing what is considered right. A person who follows all the rules is, by law, a good person. However, I would agree with the virtue ethicists more because a good person would obviously possess a good character. In order to be truly good, a person must live a good life by adhering to their personal values and values that are commonly known to be virtues. When determining who is good and who is not good, you without a doubt, have to look at that person’s character. A person with good values is in turn, a good person and a person with bad values is, in a bad …show more content…
Someone who supports Kantianism would argue that they are right and say that a person is good because they always do what is right. However, that does not tell the whole story. By no means am I arguing that doing what is right or fulfilling your moral duty doesn’t make a person good, but what makes a person more good is having a good character. A genuinely good person does not do good things just solely because they are required to by law or should do it. They do good things because it is in their nature and they value these

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    By emphasizing the importance of character traits, Aristotle gives humans credit that they can be good people performing activities because of their character not just because of rules they ought to follow. The only weak point in the theory is the reliance on virtue being essential to happiness. It fails to consider that everyone is different, unlike character traits/moral virtues which can vary from person to person or culture to culture. If the ethics of virtue applied all of its components more universally, realizing that everyone is different and that some virtuous people are not happy and some non-virtuous people are, it would make a more sound…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s ethics is all about good will and following your duties. He believes that we need to have the right motives and if we do, then it is good. For example, we should be loyal to people, but if you are being loyal to an evil person, then that is not good. If you are being loyal to a good person, someone who has a goodwill then that is following your duty. Having a goodwill is unique in that the fact that is is always deemed moral and right, even if it fails to achieve its intentions.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Someone with the mentality of an ethical egotist will think first about the consequences about the decision that they are about to make. As previously stated, a virtuous person wants to live a life filled with happiness a life that will make them grow into being a good person, or at least with the idea that they themselves are a good person. The same goes for an ethical…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Waking Dead Analysis

    • 1292 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A human’s function for good is to have “the activity of the soul in accordance with virtue” (Aristotle 84). Since only humans can truly reason, this is how they control their emotions and needs. Virtues are something humans are not born worth, but are choices that can become stronger with habit. Aristotle knows that being a good person is not easy and understands that human emotions should be accounted for. To be morally good is to have a good state of character based on your rational median.…

    • 1292 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When based off of feelings as for a reward for doing the right thing then it is not morality. The main goal is to fulfill a duty, whether we think it’s right or wrong, whether we get pleasure from it or not, whether we benefit from it or not. In his view, morals are superior to emotions and desires. His theory consist of deontological ethics that are based on character (Kant, p 44). When a person makes a decision based on the moral law, then they are considered a “good” person in Kant’s eyes.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (255) The point of virtue ethics is to become a more virtuous person, and virtue is a character trait, which defines the person. Habits and actions that are right fail to be morally admirable because they are not virtuous. To be virtuous is to have good inner life where you know what is important, what is right, why it is right, and you do the action because it is right. For example, a person is virtuous when they decide to clean up after themselves because they know it is right to be responsible for their mess and they do clean it up because it is responsible and they know they do this in order not to cause trouble for others. An example of when a person fails to be morally admirable is when a guy decides to open a door for a struggling, old lady in order to show a girl he is interested that he was courteous.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is for our soul to have life and for it to be filled with happiness. It’s an active life that has it with rational principals. Going back to Kant, and him talking about good will, to me basically with having good will I could be laying down and not doing anything, but to contain me still having good will. Kant went logically wrong about his view on good because to him, the human well-being “happiness are two different independent point of views. Kant’s ethical goal is about following the principals, he believed there was a supreme principal for morality and referred it to the categorical Imperative, which were imperative, hypothetical, and categorical imperatives.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant starts right off by talking about the only thing that can be considered good without limitations is that of a good will. He describes how the things that bring forth happiness can also cause arrogance unless a good will is present (4:393). He talks about how moderation in affects and passions, as well as self-control and calm reflection are not only good for all purposes, but they even effect the inner worth of a person. Kant believes without the basic principles of good will they can become evil (4:394). He tells us how a good will is good do only its volition, meaning it itself is good.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical Theory Of Virtue

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Virtues have moral value because their effects have value for humans. This virtue engages in our personal feelings more than the obligation virtues (Burton 225). It important to like the actions you are committing. Virtue ethics are also good because there is no room for failure “One is not necessarily a moral failure for being weak” (Burton 225) in a particular virtue area (social and generosity). This states that there is always room for improvement.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant and Aristotle are both philosophers who have different views about the highest human good and morality. Kant believes the only thing perfectly good is the good will (Haber 1993, 61). It is independent of other influences and acts in accordance with duty. The good will is intrinsically good, good without qualification. However, that is not to say everything a human does is done with good will, hence why it is based off duty.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays