The word “revolution” has several meanings: It can indicate a deliberate opposition against an existing state of affairs (similar to the English Revolution), or it can denote an unforeseen era of social metamorphosis (much like the Industrial Revolution). A majority of people agree today that the “Sexual Revolution” in the United States reflects a comparatively discontinuous time period during the 1960s and 1970s, where cardinal changes towards sexual attitudes and behaviors are depicted at the core. Men most definitely benefited from the new sexual privileges, although it was barely a deviation from their lived experience. Mike Nichols chronicles the experiences of Sandy and Jonathan in the film Carnal Knowledge, an epic narrative which spans
…show more content…
As previously mentioned, the film Carnal Knowledge analyzes the sexual revolution of the 1960s from the prospective of Jonathan and Sandy. The degree to which the sexual revolution has affected the males in the film is slim to none, while the females in the film are negatively affected by the sexual revolution. Towards the beginning of the film, Jonathan and Sandy attend a social mixer where the beautiful Susan is in attendance. Before either of them speak to Susan, they contemplate who is entitled to pursue her before Jonathan “graciously” proclaims to Sandy, “I giver her to you” to which Sandy replies “I’m grateful”. Susan is treated like a sexual conquest and like an object while Sandy idolizes her, and Jonathan objectifies her. This scene exemplifies misogyny in a “liberated” …show more content…
After Jonathan and Susan begin having an affair behind Sandy’s back, Jonathan exits the affair with a girl who gives him regular access to sex due to the fact that Susan can tell Sandy his thoughts, but cannot tell Jonathan his. His opaqueness does allow him to project a genuine connection, or thought. Susan’s failure to deliver upsets Jonathan because a successful relationship consisting of both sex and intimacy eludes him. Just because Jonathan and Susan have sex does not mean either is satisfied, and a purely sex-driven relationship was ultimately their downfall, given her comparable greater intimacy with Sandy. Fast forwarding to the scene where Jonathan and Sandy are at the skating rink, and Jonathan says “I may be too much of a perfectionist. This last one came so close. Good tits. Not great. Almost no ass at all, and that bothered me. Sensational legs. I 'd settle for the legs, if she had two more inches here and three here.” Sandy replies “You don’t want a family?” and Jonathan says “Who needs it?’. Jonathan is most definitely has a greater access to sex, yet he is depicted as unfulfilled and unhappy. No woman is good enough for him, and his search for sexual accumulation drones on. The introduction of Bobbie, a vivacious beauty who becomes the object of Jonathan’s desire ultimately reveals that even though sex played a central role in the beginnings of their
As previously mentioned, the film Carnal Knowledge analyzes the sexual revolution of the 1960s from the prospective of Jonathan and Sandy. The degree to which the sexual revolution has affected the males in the film is slim to none, while the females in the film are negatively affected by the sexual revolution. Towards the beginning of the film, Jonathan and Sandy attend a social mixer where the beautiful Susan is in attendance. Before either of them speak to Susan, they contemplate who is entitled to pursue her before Jonathan “graciously” proclaims to Sandy, “I giver her to you” to which Sandy replies “I’m grateful”. Susan is treated like a sexual conquest and like an object while Sandy idolizes her, and Jonathan objectifies her. This scene exemplifies misogyny in a “liberated” …show more content…
After Jonathan and Susan begin having an affair behind Sandy’s back, Jonathan exits the affair with a girl who gives him regular access to sex due to the fact that Susan can tell Sandy his thoughts, but cannot tell Jonathan his. His opaqueness does allow him to project a genuine connection, or thought. Susan’s failure to deliver upsets Jonathan because a successful relationship consisting of both sex and intimacy eludes him. Just because Jonathan and Susan have sex does not mean either is satisfied, and a purely sex-driven relationship was ultimately their downfall, given her comparable greater intimacy with Sandy. Fast forwarding to the scene where Jonathan and Sandy are at the skating rink, and Jonathan says “I may be too much of a perfectionist. This last one came so close. Good tits. Not great. Almost no ass at all, and that bothered me. Sensational legs. I 'd settle for the legs, if she had two more inches here and three here.” Sandy replies “You don’t want a family?” and Jonathan says “Who needs it?’. Jonathan is most definitely has a greater access to sex, yet he is depicted as unfulfilled and unhappy. No woman is good enough for him, and his search for sexual accumulation drones on. The introduction of Bobbie, a vivacious beauty who becomes the object of Jonathan’s desire ultimately reveals that even though sex played a central role in the beginnings of their