Why The Gun Control Movement Gary Younge Analysis

Improved Essays
Gary Younge’s article “Why the Gun Control Movement Fails” was very effective. Younge establishes credibility by visiting with families who lost loved ones due to gun violence. He uses emotional appeal by talking about how Kenneth Mills Tucker was killed and he is logical in his presentation of facts at the end of his article. I will now explain how Younge establishes credibility in his article.
Younge presents himself as credible in his article. It is important that he is credible in this article, because people won’t want to listen to him if they don’t believe he is credible since this is such an important topic. He gives examples of his authority over the topic of gun violence throughout the entire article by visiting with families and
…show more content…
So by using other people’s words it makes him look more credible even though he isn’t the one saying those words. One of the main reasons Younge is credible is because he presents himself as very professional by using correct language throughout his article and because his article was published by a professional source. Another reason that he is credible is he is a writer for The Guardian (a British newspaper). He also went to college at Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh. Although he didn’t share this information in his paper this still makes him credible because he is a professional author. In my next paragraph I will analyze how Younge uses emotional appeal.
Younge’s use of emotional appeal in his article is very strong. It is important that Younge makes an appeal to the reader’s emotions because this is an emotional topic. Whenever people are killed by guns it is extremely emotional for the friends and families of the people who were killed by gun violence. Emotional appeal is heavily used throughout the first four paragraphs and is only used sparingly throughout the rest of the article. Losing a loved one is extremely emotional and Younge uses that to explain
…show more content…
In fact, it was a big part of his argument. His use of logic was important because this topic requires a logical approach to solve the problem. He points out that there are too many guns in America and that was one of the reasons he believes the gun control movement fails. This was a very logical approach to the problem of gun violence because there are too many guns in America, there’s no possible way you can seize all of them. An example of this is when he was interviewing Judy Williams (a leader of the Mothers of Murdered Offspring group) and she says “The reality of it is, they are not going to do away with guns in this country…. The fact is that they are so plentiful on the streets and people have them…. It's ludicrous to think you can take guns out of people's homes in this country…. It ain't gonna happen” (Younge 1). This is true because there is now way you can get rid of all the guns in America. He also points out that banning a certain type of weapon would also be very

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    takes an analytical approach to both sides of the debate. The skyrocketing rise in interest groups advocating on enforcing tougher firearm policies can be attributed to the incremented insecurities within public places, such as the ones mentioned in the documentary. There are no precise demands proclaimed by these advocates for the exception of “tougher firearm policies.” The theory behind their reasoning is that the implementation of tougher firearm policies would subsequently reduce the number of firearms in the streets and thus lower the probability of disasters like the Columbine and Sandy Hook school tragedies. However in similar fashion, the rise in awareness for the interest group advocating the passionate defense of the American’s right to bear arms, known as the N.R.A. (National Rifle Association), has captivated the American political scene and continues to heavily derail this theory by proclaiming their own.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this article, Taya Kyle, wife of the late Chris Kyle makes the case that gun freedoms should be protected. She begins the article by saying that she has been on both sides of this particular issue, and that she has often felt way that gun control advocates do. She also states that she is now a gun owner and that she can now understand what it feels like to have her freedoms threatened. The tension in this country surrounding gun control has gone up not because of a statistical increase in crime, but because of the widely reported mass killings like the Ft. Hood, and The Pulse Nightclub.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the midst of his article, Charles M. Blow supplements his argument for stricter gun laws by examining and discussing major shootings in recent U.S. history. In introducing these acts of gun violence, he asserts his claim through the repetition of the phrase, “When we learned, to our great horror,” describing the context of a major shooting after each clause. After explaining the context of each instance, he emphasizes on the point that no significant government action was taken in any of these, thus prompting the nation to step further and further towards the decline of the debate on guns. At the end of this build up, Blow juxtaposes “the blood running through our streets” to the “increasingly unfettered right to bear arms,” proposing the…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The article “Guns a Loaded Argument” by Paul Rosenzweig argues his interpretation of the popular controversy over gun laws in the United States. The author Paul Rosenzweig is an adjunct professor of law at George Mason University. He is also the senior legal research colleague in the Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation, the website in which the article is available. The Heritage Foundation is a research and informative institution that publicizes conservative policy topics that support the principle ideas that the foundation stands for. The author has written this article for a mainly conservative audience of readers to allow people more insight into the intricate issues of gun control.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Adam Gopnik’s essay “Shootings,” he shows concerned with the growth of gun violence in the United Sates, and the lack of action from the government in making strong and restrictive gun control laws to prevent further deaths and massacres by guns. Gopnik was even more concerned on how easy it is for people with a history of mental illness acquiring weapons that were only made to kill people. By comparing United States with others countries which have restrictive and tightens gun control laws, Gopnik shows how deaths by mass shooting has decreased in those countries since the government started to taking action, and they never had to experience the same incident as severe as the first one. The main purpose of the Gopnik essay is to persuade…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this New York Times article Erik Eckholm uses mass shootings such as the Columbine, Virginia tech and Sandy Hook shootings to demonstrate the need for stricter gun laws. The writing of this article was sparked by the most recent shooting in Roseburg, Oregon. By using these tragedies along with very supportive statistics he is able to persuade the reader to believe that the current laws and restrictions simply are not enough. 90 people a day are killed by guns, two thirds of that statistic are suicides. This goes to show that Eckholm understands that sometimes “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.”…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Campus Carry

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    He gives credit to the author by claiming that he provides “a very unique approach to the question of gun rights” (Hsiao). However, following that, he introduces several reasons which decreases the credibility of DeBrabander’s argument. Hsiao finds DeBrabander’s argument to be shallow as it fails to include empirical data which are very relevant to the debate, such as the “analyzed county level data from 1977 to 2000, [which] found annual reductions in murder rates between 1.5 % and 2.3 % for each additional year that a right to carry law is in effect” (Hsiao). Furthermore, he states that DeBrabander could have balanced the lack of empirical data with the inclusion of viewpoints of experts on this subject to add credibility. With these reasons, Hsiao’s entry answers the question of whether or not the evidences provided by DeBrabander are credible or not by claiming the evidences to be unreliable.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control in America is a significant issue, with an average of 91 gun related deaths per day, it is a matter that can no longer be ignored. Being controversial in its nature, author Phoebe Maltz Bovy doesn 't hesitate to shed light on her opinion on the affair. In her article “It’s Time to Ban Guns. Yes, All of Them.” Bovy is quick to state that all guns are bad regardless of their purpose or the respective owner, that they’re all nothing more than dangerous machines.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Second Amendment of the United States constitution gives all citizens the unequivocal right to keep and bear arms, and as the constitution outlines this right shall not be infringed upon by any state actors. But, what happens when this unequivocal right leads to citizens obtaining firearms, when they have a mental health deficiency, or deemed criminally negligent, and these occurrences pose a threat to our national security, and safety as a nation of free citizens? Politicians and citizens believe they can answer this question based upon a statistical analysis of gun violence, and mass shootings that occur across the nation. However, the true answer lies within how to implement gun control measures, while still maintaining freedom for all…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He mentioned several cases in which people who were mentally unstable had guns and used them to harm other people. It is important to take into consideration all of the cases around the nation in which a man or woman shot and killed innocent people. Gun control does not decrease the murder rate, neither does it strip criminals of their firearms. It does not seem fair that the government will enforce gun control laws, but will not disarm criminals. In simple words, gun control will not solve the problem that is known as gun violence.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That not only will not decrease the number of criminals have guns, but also decrease the number of law-abiding citizens have guns, which make law-abiding citizens lose ability of self – protection. The more important thing is that sources of crime is the people’s thoughts and desires. Each of the shootings the killers was the person who shot, not the gun itself. The Government cannot simply rudely to solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Realizing that his audience includes liberals who know this, Cronin does not try to find any rare statistics that are in favor of firearms. Although he could have just avoided numbers altogether, he concedes that, “statistically speaking, a gun in the home represents a far greater danger to the inhabitants than to the intruder” (Cronin 20*). Although he is giving up some ground on his case, this confession shows readers that Cronin is not trying to fool anyone. He argues that the dilemma of gun ownership is not as much about what the stats says, but instead a decision that “comes from the gut” (Cronin 20*). By admitting that guns could potentially bring danger to his family, it makes the reader even more eager to hear his pro-gun…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control is Not the Solution Increased Gun Control in the United States is absurd, useless, and unnecessary. In order to increase safety all throughout the United States time and effort must not be spent towards limiting gun owners of their rights. The tragic rash of school, religious, and workplace shootings has turned up the heat on the public conversation about guns. In nearly all of these cases gun laws would not have stopped the shooters from obtaining a firearm.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Q. Wilson utilizes an extensive amount of logical appeal to influence the audience to become involved in their communities to stop future gun violence, by including credible facts,…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Policy Of Gun Control

    • 1799 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I chose to review the policy of gun control. Years ago, shootings were not a worry in American’s lives. Now, it can be a fear to drop your children off at school. Safety should be taken very seriously, and putting more importance on gun control laws is a major first step.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays