Why Cloning Is Wrong

Improved Essays
According to UCDavis.edu/news The average success rate of cloning is fewer than 10% ! That means over 90% of cloning is a failure. And the unsuccessfulness of cloning is just one of the many reasons cloning should me illegal, a few more are Cloning is very cruel to its subjects and extremely unmoral.Cloning also has little to no actual benefit and predominantly causes pain and suffering. While cloning may seem joyus to some because its creating life, in reality cloning is very cruel and causes an immense amount of suffering, “Excitement over Noah soon tanked: At two days old the calf died of scours, chronic diarrhea in livestock caused by an intestinal infection”(Stewart).This shows how cruel and painful cloning can be because even though …show more content…
Although some people may ignore this because they are nonreligious that doesn't change the fact that it's wrong, “ It teaches that human life is sacred because, from its beginning, it involves "the creative action of God;...no one can, under any circumstances, claim for himself the right directly to destroy a human being". The Church also teaches that "the gift of human life must be actualized in marriage through the specific and exclusive acts of husband and wife, in accordance with the laws inscribed in their persons and in their union" (Shea) This cloning is morally wrong because life should be created the way god intended it to be rather than in a lab. It is cruel and wrong for cloning to be legal because, “ the retrieval of (embryonic stem) cells is morally unacceptable because it results in the death of the embryo...a human person, including an embryo, must never be used as a means to an end” (Shea). This very wrong because it involves killing which should not be are choose to take a life,especially not one that is not are own. And even though cloning can help with research that does not change the wrong and unmoralness of it, “involves either the killing, or morally illicit procreation, of human embryos by in-vitro fertilization or nuclear transfer. Even if cloning from embryonic stem cells is done to help the treatment of disease, the good end cannot justify the evil

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays
    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays
    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I personally believe that cloning could be both a good and bad thing, and both sides make absolutely great points in their arguments. However, I believe that we should be able to have the choice whether or not we want to contribute to it or if we do not. Nevertheless, I think it depends on the reasoning you have for wanting and/or needing cloning done. I do believe that not all forms are ethically correct. I do agree with therapeutic cloning, as it could help people who may have cancer of a certain organ, that way they can clone the organ and just receive it instead of being put on a waiting list to find a potential match.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Summary/Response: “Human Reproductive Cloning: A Conflict of Liberties.” In this article “Human Reproductive Cloning: A Conflict of Liberties,” Joyce C. Havstad’s conflict is if cloning becomes safe and reliable, people should be able to have reproductive freedom. The author explained that promoters of human cloning know that it may lead to harmful characteristics. Instead of positively promoting human cloning they explain the causes and effects that could take place.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Cloning is Bad You are a scientist and you find out that the animal you cloned had defects in its body. Advances in science like cloning are bad because if one animal’s DNA has an error, it could give the other animal a defect as well. One reason I think cloning is bad is because clones could develop cancer.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In a two part viewpoint, David A. Prentice and William Saunders discuss the science and ethics of Therapeutic cloning. In the first portion Prentice argues that creating clones for the sole purpose of embryonic stem cell research commonly known as " Therapeutic Cloning," is not very different from reproductive cloning. He also points out that therapeutic cloning is not very therapeutic for the embryo involved. In the second portion of the viewpoint, Saunders elaborates on Prentice's arguments and goes more in depth. Saunders goes as far as to point out that therapeutic cloning is barely any different than the horrific experiment practiced by the Nazis during the time of World War II.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the sheep Dolly was born, cloning turned from a Science Fiction to a reality humans have to deal with on so many levels. Cloning to bring back distinct animals, create a new breads and for humans cloning either to produce children for people who can’t have them, to avoid DNA related diseases, to produce organs for sick people who need them, to get a fresh new clone of a lost loved ones or even create super humans. All that has raised a lot of talk among the public. Since Day one, cloning has been tagged with playing the role of “GOD”, and when that happens, first questions rushed to all our minds are; how Ethical/ Unethical would that be? And how safe is it for all the parties involved?…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Human Cloning

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited

    Cloning is a sin in front of god because in the bible it says “So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them “Genesis 1:27. God created people in his own image, and for babies to be created in mother’s womb, in the natural way not in a test tube. Anyone who follows God and believes in the bible should not say cloning is right especially just for organ donation, because nobody should take away the life of another person because only God can take away lives. Men did not create our life but God did so a man should not have any right to take anybody’s life because only the creator can take what he gave ys therefore killing clones for donation purpose is murdering and it should be a crime. If people keep on cloning to save their loved ones or in the memory of them, then the generation is not going anywhere because we are going to keep on cloning the people that were here.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Or, the cloning of human life forms could be abused for eugenic purposes, for setting up stores for human extra parts, and for the propagation of a superman or a beast like that of Dr. Frankenstein. Along these lines, the cloning of human life form is ethically wrong, not for its own particular purpose, but rather because of conceivable abuses with deplorable results that damage the ethical guideline of non-maleficence and additionally the rule of…

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A lot of scientists in different fields and people all around the world think that cloning is very unethical and should never be used. They believe that cloning would separate the clone from everyone else making them feel unworthy or left out. For others such as, Karen Weintraub a scientific journalist, she believes that is “--silly and sad for people to spend thousands or hundreds of thousands of dollars thinking they will get back a beloved pet through cloning.” Weintraub believes that death is a part of life and scientists should not try and avoid it. “Death is a terrible part of life, but cloning won’t allow us to avoid it.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of human cloning, such failures would result in abortions, miscarriages, or births of malformed or diseased individuals. These results are considered unacceptable by all current ethical standards (DOC: Cloning). Therapeutic cloning is a genetic material extracted from an adult cell is placed in use inside of nuclei egg, to produce the cloning gene for cures for diseases. This is true, but therapeutic cloning also involves the destruction of an embryo to treat another person, and the destruction of one person to benefit another is immoral.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Religious groups argue that humans should not play the role of God. Modifying human embryos is indeed unnatural but if it used for the greater good there is no arguing against…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cloning is a way to reproduce, in which human beings are manufactured in the laboratory to specifications entitled by the patient. It is not a worthy way to bring a new human being into the world. For stem cell research, it involves the morally wrong actions by destroying an innocent human life for possible benefit to others. In additionally to being wrong, it created human life, to kill and use them for its cells- more or less as a cycle. As a result of being morally wrong for the brutality, it can cause.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, the disadvantages of cloning outweigh the benefits. Even though cloning can be useful by providing children to families, subjects for experimentation, and extra body parts, it is generally considered unethical to clone and to play God. If we cloned humans, they would very likely have genetic defects…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays