Summary/Response: “Human Reproductive Cloning: A Conflict of Liberties.”
In this article “Human Reproductive Cloning: A Conflict of Liberties,” Joyce C. Havstad’s conflict is if cloning becomes safe and reliable, people should be able to have reproductive freedom. The author explained that promoters of human cloning know that it may lead to harmful characteristics. Instead of positively promoting human cloning they explain the causes and effects that could take place. They do strive to allow people to be able to have an option to be cloned. According to Joyce C. Havstad, “But they often proceed with their endorsement of human reproductive cloning by dismissing these psychological harms in two ways” (72). Joyce C. Havstad explains the two ways
In this article “Human Reproductive Cloning: A Conflict of Liberties,” Joyce C. Havstad’s conflict is if cloning becomes safe and reliable, people should be able to have reproductive freedom. The author explained that promoters of human cloning know that it may lead to harmful characteristics. Instead of positively promoting human cloning they explain the causes and effects that could take place. They do strive to allow people to be able to have an option to be cloned. According to Joyce C. Havstad, “But they often proceed with their endorsement of human reproductive cloning by dismissing these psychological harms in two ways” (72). Joyce C. Havstad explains the two ways