What Is Kant's Categorical Imperative?

Improved Essays
In the medical field, there are several ethical issues that can arise. In the case of whether Nurse Sanchez is at liberty to tell Jake that he is dying from leukemia, there are obviously some ethical issues at play. In analyzing this particular issue, I will utilize three formulas of Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative to show that Jake should be told about his prognosis because not telling him would violate each formula. The first formula of Kant’s categorical imperative that I will use is the Formula of Universal Law. This formula essentially states that a certain action must be able to be applied to anyone and it must result in only good. In this instance, I will use the fact that Jake’s mother is comfortable lying to Jake, as well as encouraging the doctors to lie to him as well, as the action. Per the Formula of Universal Law, lying is an action whose maxim fails the categorical imperative. Lying can be applied to anyone, as anyone can lie, but it does not result in good because it misleads people. Therefore, Jake’s mom and doctors lying to him fails to pass as an acceptable action when applied to the Formula of Universal Law. The second formula is the Formula of Humanity as an End. The main idea of this formula is that we should never use a person as a means to an …show more content…
This formula states that forcing people to go against their rights or what is good for them is wrong. The situation we are presented with violates this in two ways. First, it violates Jake’s right to know what is going on with his own body. While he may be a minor in legal terms, Kant does not distinguish an age at which we gain autonomy, therefore we must assume that Jake has this right. Second, it violates Nurse Sanchez’s right to do what is good for her, and it forces her to go against her beliefs and rights. As a result, the situation violates the third formula of Kant’s categorical imperative that I have

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Some people may think determining the morality of an action as an easy task, and fail to realize that it is no easy task. Every action is driven by other actions, and depending on the circumstances, an act may be moral in some cases and not in others. This is why Kant favors the Categorical Imperative when compared to other methods of determining morality. The Categorical Imperative does not deal with circumstances, instead it denotes an all-encompassing rule that, if obeyed, means actions would be moral no matter what the situation may be. He first describes the Categorical Imperative when he states, “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (Kant 14).…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The topic of a patient choosing to take their own life in the medical field is a widely debated issue. When the topic is being addressed, the health care workers must take into consideration the law, and ethics. Law and ethics play a big role due to the life or death situation the patients face. A worker must abide by the rules and law of their field, yet they must take everything into consideration to see whether if it is ethical or not. The article “Case Twenty-three: A Fevered Hand on a Cooling Brow-…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Miss Evers Boys Sparknotes

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Despite the negative consequences Kant urges everyone to take on these two roles in order to encourage good intentions and good people thereby. As a nurse Miss Evers not only has the duty to care for her patients but more importantly she has the responsibility to protect their rights and to stand up for their interests at all times. Her universal duty, outside her nursing role is to be kind to people and to respect their rights as a person. To some extent Miss Evers does care for and is very sympathetic towards her patients but she fails to fulfill her roles entirely because she makes decisions based on her emotions and not her intellect. When making decisions based on our emotions, we often tend to do what we ‘want’ and not necessarily what we…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The values then at stake in Anna's case are autonomy, duty to mother a child, non-malfeasance (to do no harm) to her child whom she is obligated to and to be beneficent in doing good for the child and her own life (Collier & Haliburton, 2015, p.99). Anna has good intentions and a good will towards keeping this child, and as a mother she has a duty to take care of that child and do no harm to the child as the competent adult she is said to be. However, good intentions alone or the duty towards someone/something is not enough for the act to be deemed moral. It must be subjected to the C.I. posed by Kant for testing. The universality formation test displays that if each mother is to leave her disabled/dying infant to breathe their last because…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One’s moral compromise, integrity, honesty, or if you will be compromising your virtues are the issues that are at stake in the article. One of the points of the author was that if engaging in that behavior does not put anyone in danger it is acceptable; however, it can be argued on the morals of the individual. For example – cheating, just because 99% of the class is cheating in an exam does that mean its ok for you to cheat as well? that is something morally questionable in that case.…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this essay, I hope to argue that Kant’s Universal Law Formulation of the Categorical Imperative fails to consider individual situations as they are in the context of the world in which they were created. Instead the formulation seeks to generalize all scenarios, making each of them impossible to analyze due to this lack of specificity. For that reason, in order to appropriately apply Kant’s Universal Law Formulation of the Categorical Imperative it is necessary to first understand the definition of the Universal Law Formulation of the Categorical Imperative, and the context in which it is applied. Dan Ariely, a behavioral economist, ran a multitude of experiments in order to properly study lying and the scenarios that would cause them to…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Taking note of the main deontological theory as proposed by Kant that one must follow a categorical imperative always without any deviation, Ross conceives of a theory that is less demanding on us as moral agents. According to Kant’s categorical imperative, we have “perfect duties require us to do or abstain from certain acts, and there are no legitimate exceptions to them.” Following this line of reasoning, the doctor in this case would be obligated to tell the patient absolutely everything about his diagnosis of azoospermia, even possibly down to the detail his daughter cannot be his. However, in cases such as this, it is not morally acceptable to think to disclose such damaging information to the patient. It is here that Ross proposes the use of prima facie duties as Kantian deontology is far too rigid for the field of…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The moral theory that the nurse would use to support the patient then would be Kantianism’s Deontology which states that it is the intention (what he calls maxims or good will) that is truly weighed against one's duties/responsibilities through a string of tests (Collier & Haliburton, 2015, p.14). Before any decision can be made Kant puts it through a series of three tests called the Categorical Imperative (C.I.) in order to see if the act is permissible or prohibited, where the situation only needs to pass one because Kant claims that it will then pass them all (Collier & Haliburton, 2015, p.17). The first test within the C.I. is universality formulation that states that an act is permissible only if it can be created into universal rule and…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s categorical Imperative means or explains that a people should act only on that reason or decision through which you can at the same time will that it…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Immanuel Kant is one of the greatest philosophers who lived in the 18th century. Brought up in a family of staunch Protestants, Kant lost his father at an early age when he just enrolled into campus, which nurtured his responsibility. The philosopher’s accounts on imperatives are clearly outlined in his work of “The Groundwork of Metaphysics of Morals.” Several critics have had the perception of “absolute” morality; thinking that situations do not bear what ought to be done (Kant, Gregor and Timmerman). Some critics also feel that Kant was an absolutist in the sense of morality, an assertion that might not be ruled out.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second segment explains why it is sometimes morally permissible for a person to break the rule of don’t deceive. The third and final area will allow us to draw a general conclusion as we tie all sections together about the moral rule of Don’t Deceive. Keeping the Moral Rule Don’t Deceive Deceiving is probably one of the most common morally wrong acts that we as human beings carry out on a daily basis. Half the time, we are unaware it occurs because it has become the norm.…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Categorical Imperative emphasizes “the importance of rationality, consistency, impartiality, and respect for persons in the way we live our lives. If Kant is correct that moral absolutes cannot be violated, then he prevents any loopholes, self-serving exceptions, and personal biases in the determination of our duties” (Anscombe). The Categorical Imperative does well in preventing loopholes, self-serving exceptions, and personal biases, however, in doing that, it does not properly address areas that need an exception. For example, if a murderer at the front door of a family’s home is looking to kill the children asks if the children are home, the parent would be required to tell the murderer that the children are home, thus further endangering the lives of the children, and going against the duties of being a parent. In this case, the parent would have to choose between performing their duty, and protecting their children by lying to the murderer or being honest to the murderer and endangering the lives of their children.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Dilemma: is it Ethical for Jack and his tribe to kill Simon The book, Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding, tells the story of a plane full of boys that have been evacuated from England. Their plane crashes on an island. Upon crashing, the pilot and all the other adults have died, and the young children have been left alone on the island. The oldest child is named Ralph, who is 12 years of age.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant believed that the moral worth of an action depends solely on the motive of the action and that the supreme principle of morality is the categorical imperative. Now, consider that a man named Jones is terminally ill with only a week to live and his last week will be full of pain and misery. However, Jones, his family, and his physicians all agree that a drug-induced, painless death would be preferable; Jones just has to determine if an induced death is morally permissible. In order to do this Jones’, his family and his physicians must test their action as a categorical imperative by using Kant’s Universal Law, Law of Nature, and Humanity Formulation.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before I go on explaining what Kant meant by claiming that humanity must be valued as an “end in itself”; we have to go through his other claims as well to comprehend what he means by this. We all know that the only thing that matters is apparently our “good will” to be a nice person. And that “good will” should be without any incentives which Kant declares it as “moral”; and all this unconditional incitement he refers to as “priori”. But we have hardly seen any examples where actions have been taken without any motive and that is why categorical imperatives must therefore be derived as priori. According to categorical imperative in terms of the will of a rational person it means that you should treat other people like the way you want to be…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays