Ethical Dilemma In William Golding's Lord Of The Flies

Improved Essays
Ethical Dilemma: is it Ethical for Jack and his tribe to kill Simon

The book, Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding, tells the story of a plane full of boys that have been evacuated from England. Their plane crashes on an island. Upon crashing, the pilot and all the other adults have died, and the young children have been left alone on the island. The oldest child is named Ralph, who is 12 years of age. Ralph, the protagonist of the novel, teams up with his friend Piggy, and gather the boys in one spot. When the boys assemble, most are in tears and scared for their lives. Ralph suggests that they should come up with a set of rules that they should follow in an attempt to keep order on the island. He first recommends that they pick
…show more content…
The categorical imperative is a moral obligation that is not dependent on the situation of individual, meaning there is a set rule for everyone. A Kantian would say that in order to do something, everyone else must also be allowed to do it. This means that if someone can lie, then everyone can lie, and if someone can steal then everyone can steal. A Kantian would add that if the situation in which you try to achieve your maxim is immoral, do not give up. Rather, you should find a different way in which to achieve the maxim. In this situation, the maxim is for everyone to join Jack’s tribe, however, the action to realize the maxim is to kill Simon. Jack thinks that, in order to achieve his maxim, it is okay to kill Simon. In this case, a Kantian would say that he should not kill Simon, for the simple reason that if you can kill without consequence, then the entire world should be able to do the same, and what if we lived in a world where everyone was able to kill each other. In Kant’s philosophy there is no room for exceptions, and even though the boys are put in this rough situation, it is not acceptable for them to take a person’s …show more content…
I usually subscribe to Bentham’s philosophy of Act Utilitarianism, because of the thorough method he applies when deciding whether or not something is ethical. The reason I agree with Kant in this case is because he does not focus on this particular situation, but rather, considers the hypothetical case in which the entire world is put in this situation. Although Kant and Plato would both come to the conclusion that the boys should not kill Simon, I still agree with Kant’s philosophy for many reasons. Unlike Plato, Kant focuses on what is to come from the action that is going to take place. For example, Kant says that if one person can kill, then everyone should be able to kill, and if everyone can kill then the world would not be able to function. Another reason I agree with Kant and not Plato is because Plato says that if you do bad, than you feel guilty. I personally do not believe that everyone is born with a good conscience, and therefore, people will not feel guilt for their actions, even if their actions are unethical. In conclusion, I strongly agree with Kant’s ethical philosophy, and even though a Kantian and egoist would arrive at the same conclusion, I believe that the way in which a Kantian would get to the conclusion is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding, is about a group of schoolboys who become stranded on an island from a plane crash. As Ralph, who is the leader among the group of schoolboys, encounters several devastations, he can be described as a naive individual; hence contributing to certain deaths, tragedies, and his high motivation to get rescued. Ralph’s inexperienced leadership role provides him with a high incentive to primarily get rescued. In William Golding’s book, this can be verified by, ‘“You tell me,” said Piggy anxiously. “Is there signal?”…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1954, Nobel Literature Prize winner William Golding wrote a novel, called The Lord of the Flies, describing civilized society's collapse into savage nature. In Golding's The Lord of the Flies, a group of boys is stranded on an unknown island in the Pacific Ocean during a war. In order to survive, they form their own version of society by electing Ralph as their leader and establishing rules to keep order. After the initial exploration of the island, they begin to divide tasks amongst themselves but later find that it is rather difficult to fulfill these tasks because most of them choose to ignore their assigned job. Piggy is the first person to notice this and begins the fighting among the group by chastising the members for the negligence…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Though as always, things do not turn out well and the most important thing is that the boys should be responsible for Simon’s death. That reason is why Ralph, Piggy, and Jack should be charged with second-degree murder because they had not planned to kill Simon individually but at the moment they had one intent which was to murder whatever it was. They had also caused slight panic in all the other boys by creating a mob mentality which makes them more responsible for what happened. The rest of the boys and littluns should have been charged with criminal-negligence manslaughter as they had been reckless due to the way things on the island got handled, especially sensitive things like emotions. There was lots of negligence because they were not taking care of themselves the way they should have and lost all norms that they had grown up like, turning tribal and territorial.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    World of Deception Ralph was sitting on the bow, buried his head in his hands, lost in thought of experience on the island. He looked back at the island behind which was the entirely swallowed by the fire, created a bizarre and motley image in the vast expanse of blue. If others saw it, this picture would undoubtedly consider as illusion or a sort of mirage, but for Ralph, the island seems so vivid and realistic, “I’ll leave and never come back” Ralph thinking to himself. On the shore of the isle, Ralph seems to see the Piggy and Simon smiled at him and waving hands.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When first reading the experiment in regards to rescue I and rescues II, I did not like or want to make a choice, and really, I do not have to make a choice. My job is to tell you what Stuart Mill would do and what Immanuel Kant would do based on their philosophical views of utilitarianism and categorical imperatives respectfully. In Rescue I & II Mill. Utilitarianism is the basic principle to look at what is right and wrong. Depending on the consequences or the outcomes you can select the course of action not which is in your own best interest, but that which takes into account the best interest of others.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People Are The Products of Our Environment Human nature involves the ways of thinking, feelings, and behavioral traits among human kind. The book, Lord of The Flies, by William Golding and the story of a serial killer named Jeffrey Dahmer both share similar traits when you think about how they affect “human nature” or how they affect society. Lord of the Flies and serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer’s story share similarities about human nature because they both show elements of savagery. William Golding’s Lord of the Flies is about a group of British schoolboys that got stranded on a deserted island. The main characters of this novel are: Ralph, Piggy, Jack, Simon, and Roger.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Fight for What Is Right Morals guide people throughout life and its challenging circumstances. People rely on their sense of morality to remain constant so that they can determine what is good and what is evil. However, the ever changing environment provides new circumstances that often conflict with a person’s seemingly unbreakable morals. The boys in Lord of the Flies by William Golding undergo traumatic experiences that put their morality to the test. In Lord of the Flies, the struggle of Ralph, Jack, the hunters, Piggy, and Simon to resist evil and remain good while on the deserted island proves how the novel is a moral allegory because their internal conflicts add another level to the story.…

    • 1861 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s main idea is that the thought behind your actions is what determines if it’s wrong or right, not the outcome, he uses categorical imperative. So, the moral of your action is judged by the principal that provokes the action, not the outcome as I stated above. He calls these principles “maxim”. He says “the only acceptable maxim are those that can be defined as a universal law, because it is without exception” (pg.98). He uses an example of his view of morality of suicide.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Lord of the Flies the new environment of the island leads to Jack 's savagery and killing. “At once the crowd surged after it, poured down the rock, leapt on to the beast, screamed, struck, bit, tore. There were no words, and no movements but the tearing of teeth and claws” (Golding 153). The boys have no rules on the island which causes them, and especially Jack to act with savagery and no remorse, as shown by the way Simon is murdered. Similarly, Sohrab being told he can come to America, and then having it stripped away, causes his suicide attempt as shown in the following passage, “‘No it 's not.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The boys came from a civilized country many kept their morals straight but others such as Jack became consumed by hunting. Anyone near Jack who still had their sanity intact came to the a similar conclusion, “Tried to convey the compulsion to track down and kill that was swallowing him up." ( Golding, 37) At times after going on expeditions he begins to be consumed by the idea of any type of kill. Beginning with the idea of eliminating the littleluns as a choice for entertainment, was his. Ordinarily, kills we're great for these groups of young hunters, but the kill was not always achieved .…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They were too stubborn to listen and because of it, Piggy died. Ralph is the one that tries to civilize the boys and in this effort he eventually becomes the hunted member of the group. Jack in his quest for power turns the boys against Ralph and tries to have him murdered. Ralph’s life is only spared by the coming of a navy ship, which saw the island on fire.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Suppose there was a world in which no one had a moral compass. There would be nothing stopping someone from doing anything, as nothing would be seen as “wrong” or “right.” It would be a real life Lord of the Flies, with savagery and disorder being commonplace. But what is a moral compass anyway? The dictionary definition defines it as “a person's ability to judge what is right and wrong and act accordingly,” but is there more to it than that?…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When the boys refuse, Jack goes off by himself” (Carter). First Jack is obsessed with killing the pigs to get food he always tells the pack of boys that they need meat to survive Then he wants to kill “the beast”, he tells everyone they need to kill the beast so they can be safe. Next him and his boys accidently kill one of the young children “Simon bursts into their circle, trying to tell them of his discovery. The boys, maddened by the chanting, attack and kill him, thinking him the beast” (Carter). But the group of savages completely ignore the killing of Simon, they say it was all the beasts fault, when this happens it shows how insane Jack and the hunters are.…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant and Aristotle have similarities and differences when it comes to their ethical theories. Both men believed in logically understanding what was right and moral, but just in different ways. Kant mainly focused on Humans being ends rather than the means to achieving the happiest life possible. Aristotle focused on the “Golden Mean” between emotion and action. Using Sandal’s “Jumping the Queue” and “Markets in Life and Death”, Kant and Aristotle ‘s similarities and differences will become more evident.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Categorical Imperative emphasizes “the importance of rationality, consistency, impartiality, and respect for persons in the way we live our lives. If Kant is correct that moral absolutes cannot be violated, then he prevents any loopholes, self-serving exceptions, and personal biases in the determination of our duties” (Anscombe). The Categorical Imperative does well in preventing loopholes, self-serving exceptions, and personal biases, however, in doing that, it does not properly address areas that need an exception. For example, if a murderer at the front door of a family’s home is looking to kill the children asks if the children are home, the parent would be required to tell the murderer that the children are home, thus further endangering the lives of the children, and going against the duties of being a parent. In this case, the parent would have to choose between performing their duty, and protecting their children by lying to the murderer or being honest to the murderer and endangering the lives of their children.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays