The author stops and gives his opinion on the topic, what other people have said, if Hobbes is contradicting himself or is not expanding on his ideas. Also, the author try to complete unfinished thoughts left by Hobbes and gives the reasoning of why what Hobbes wrote leads to this. An important weakness of the article is that the author does not have an order. The author wrote 20 pages about Hobbes but he never separated the different topics or gave a defined structure of what he wanted to talk about. This makes the text tiresome to read even if the topic is
The author stops and gives his opinion on the topic, what other people have said, if Hobbes is contradicting himself or is not expanding on his ideas. Also, the author try to complete unfinished thoughts left by Hobbes and gives the reasoning of why what Hobbes wrote leads to this. An important weakness of the article is that the author does not have an order. The author wrote 20 pages about Hobbes but he never separated the different topics or gave a defined structure of what he wanted to talk about. This makes the text tiresome to read even if the topic is