Analysis Of Thomas Hobbes Leviathan

Superior Essays
Thomas Hobbes’s motivation behind the book, Leviathan, is derived from the perception of a man and his intellect Hobbes purpose is to comprehend the condition of a man, which leads to the understanding of mankind, because the state of a man is nothing but artificial. To elaborate this notion, what dominates a man is his soul therefore the guidance is brought by a man’s joint and the consequences of an action are related to the nerves of a man. Hobbes claims the best way to understand mankind is to turn their thinking inwards and study oneself, which leads to understanding our thoughts, desires, and reflecting on the origin of these beliefs.
According to Leviathan, the logical way to comprehend the thoughts of a man is through its senses; the
…show more content…
Animals do not have the capacity to think or understand as humans do. Hobbes believes that thought may seem random but it can be traced to a logically perfect thought process. This is important to understand because it takes us back to Hobbes thesis about, constantly interacting motions in our minds. A thought is connecting with a desire and means to achieve that desire. Thoughts are embedded in our minds and can be portrayed by speaking to others, which helps us remember our past thoughts and express them to others. Humans have memories and imaginations of their own but reason and thoughts differentiate humans from animals. Humans have a unique mind which can connect on thought that may have taken years ago and connect it to a thought that may be recent. For example, you are at a retail store and you start to crave ice cream. This may seem random but if you try to remember this can go back to when you had ice cream while shopping and you enjoyed that moment a lot. Some moments are connected and thoughts are a part of that …show more content…
The idea of “blank slate,” the view is that we come in this world not knowing anything and then learn from the experiences we gain. So if we have never experienced something, how can we imagine it? Hobbes argument to this would be from a prime example of a unicorn. Even though we have never seen a unicorn, we can some how imagine a horse with a horn on his head. How is this possible? The way we would imagine this, is by knowing and understanding the two objects from our past experience. We should know that a unicorn requires a horse and a horn, when we can imagine both things individually, we can start by combining them and then imagine the picture we created. This is the idea of “simple imagination” that Hobbes is trying to explain. Hobbes method of determining human nature seems mathematical based, he seems to a have a formula for everything. The world is always in motion, this shows human are constantly in motion, which means we gain experiences as feelings, we acknowledge that we have endless wants and desires. If this world was in a state of rest, that would mean are desires would be limited and human nature would be at peace. Hobbes argument about motion is the foundation of a much bigger argument, which we will come to see his man argument regarding man and

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Many of Hobbes’ ideas are derived from the basic assumption that all humans are intrinsically selfish. We are all born relatively equal in our physical and intellectual capacities and so we are constantly striving to be better than others. This comes with being an autonomous individual. We are all responsible for ourselves, so the next logical step is to serve ourselves. He is a materialist, so he does not believe in any form of a higher, divine being.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Leviathan, Hobbes makes a few key assumptions about human behavior in the natural world – namely that all men are equal, desire for what is best for oneself, and have the right to do all things in the preservation and improvement of life – in the “the state of nature”. Upon this, he builds his subtractive…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 3 demonstrates Searle’s critical abilities towards Dualism and Materialism, as well as the responses to these arguments by materialists. The opinions include: the prospect of zombification and famous analogies “What Is It like to Be a Bat’, “What Mary Didn’t know” and “the Chinese room” by Nagel, Jackson and Searle himself. In Chapters 4 and 5, Searle’s twofold description of consciousness include its configuration and causal link to our physical bodies as well as the outside world. These influence readers to conclude that if a spectrum of ideas ranging from an immortal spirit to artificial intelligence cannot offer an explanation to the mind body problem where do we go from there? Luckily, Searle provides a solution with “biological…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people believe that complete freedom will bring chaos to individuals because humans need some sort of leadership, and some believe that freedom brings only opportunities to show how great some people truly are. These two contrasting views on freedom are explained through the philosophical texts and views of Martin Luther King Jr and Thomas Hobbes. Martin Luther King Jr enlightened the entire world with his views in Love, Law and Civil Disobedience and Thomas Hobbes showed the world a new side of political philosophy with his work in Leviathan. In both of these works one can see the contrasting views on freedom and can judge what influenced these views based on the time period that these philosophers lived.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    PHI 1000 Fall 2016 Prof. Drain Essay #2 Thoughts on Thought After examining the several angles to the issue of animal cognition, it is my conclusion that non-human animals are in fact capable of thought. Although humans certainly display a superior cognitive ability, I believe the cognition of animals is not of an entirely different type, and that whatever difference remains is simply one of degree. While Davidson and Descartes tend to argue that language is a necessary component for rational creatures, Hobbes and Searle give non-human creatures more “cognitive credit,” citing their ability perceive, and to have and correct beliefs, as proof of being conscious, thinking, beings. Pointing to the immense biological similarities between humans…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes arrived at the idea that all people were created equal because he felt that in a natural world without government that everyone was created equal. He also believed that this was part of the problem – the reason that people chose to rebel and combat each other to fulfill their interests because that meant that no person could rise above…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite being concerned with two different objectives, Hobbes with the commonwealth concerned and Descartes with certain knowledge, both thinkers fundamentally challenged key Aristotelian notions. Hobbes challenges Aristotle’s fundamental idea that humans’ natural tendency is for society by stating that the natural state is that of war. Descartes, on the other hand, reorganizes and inverts Aristotle’s outline of the soul by creating his dualist separation of the mind and body. In their writings, both philosophers recognize key similarities in the way humans fundamentally apprehend the world, divisions within this process of apprehension, and the skepticism that should be associated with this apprehension. All understanding for Hobbes begins with the senses and the causes of these different sensations fall into two categories: primary causes, which are real, and secondary causes, which are mere projections and representations of real things.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reading one has chosen to critically analyse is Gilbert Ryle’s Descartes ' Myth. Ryle is attempting here to undermine what he dubs ‘The Official Doctrine’, which is the idea that the generally accepted answer to the mind-body problem is that of Cartesian Dualism, as presented by Descartes in the 17th Century. Ryle refers to the general acceptance as ‘The Dogma of The Ghost Machine’, as the Cartesian theory makes humans out to be just a ghost (mind) controlling a machine (body). Ryle’s main point of argument is not to simply debunk some factors or issues in the language of the theory, but to prove it entirely false, not in its details but in the principle itself.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes represents one extreme; Goldman strongly refutes Hobbes and finds herself supporting the other extreme, while Locke’s view of human nature fits somewhere in the between the two. Hobbes’ end of the spectrum views humans as sophisticated machines. He makes minimal assumptions in constructing his state of nature, and as a result, Hobbes delivers the strongest and most convincing interpretation of human nature.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thomas Hobbes Leviathan

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hobbes concludes that man has liberty, but is not legitimately free in the sense of being capable of autonomous self-determination. In this sense, his conception of reality is one of volitional determinism; a doctrine…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin, Thomas Hobbes was a pessimist towards human nature, strongly believing that humans were born greedy and hostile. To support his perceptions, Hobbes wrote Leviathan,…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hobbes

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hobbes’ maintains humans have a “natural condition,” which may be either blissful or brutish. Given such condition, Hobbes asks, how members of society to act/ought to be. Intuitively many philosophers agree members of a society existing blissfully is not only preferred, but better. And, if we grant what is better for society captures that which is good for a society, then individuals ought to act according to the promotion of this peaceful societal end. One objection to Hobbes comes from whether an individual has the right to opt-out of the contract.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Intellect:Mind over Matter, Mortimer Adler probes the relationship between the mind and the body. He describes the four main theories regarding this relationship and separates them into two categories: extreme and moderate. Among the four theories, Adler argues in favor of moderate immaterialism. His argument is easily the most convincing as it accounts for the essential difference between man and animal, our intellect, while acknowledging the congruity between the mind and body.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes cared about maximizing liberty, defining social justice, and knowing how to divide the limits of the government power. The process of the state of nature is formed by a community and a government. People would view him as a “Psychological egoist” he was over the top with an unrealistic view of human nature. In the laws of nature and the social contract, “Hobbes thinks the state of nature is something we ought to avoid, at any cost except our own self presentation” (Thomas Hobbes). Hobbes believed in a social contract and how it would help the government rule the society.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believes that in order for man to be protected by other men, an ultimate supreme leader must be placed. He named this absolute ruler the “Leviathan,” a sea monster depicted in the Bible, which later became the name of his treatise (Fiero, 2011). Nevertheless, Hobbes believes that if there is no leader, then there is no justification for good or bad, no man will know if what he is doing is even wrong. He states that there is no law until a person creates it, because there is no justice or injustice in nature, but only in society (“Hobbes Leviathan,” 2012). Hobbes also includes in his treatise the Leviathan that there are two things that allow people to break free from the state of nature: Fear and reason.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics