Similarities Between Machiavelli And Socrates

Improved Essays
Machiavelli and Socrates both share a similar background filled with political fragmentation and violence; however, the two philosophers would not see eye to eye on the way the government should be ran. Both men are very different in how the government should be structured and treat its people. Machiavelli’s prince would not be able to rule under the same philosophy of Socrates, and wouldn’t be able to let Socrates live among his people. In no way, would Socrates support Machiavelli’s concept of a prince seeing how it would constrain Socrates, being a gadfly. If Socrates lived under Machiavelli’s view of a prince then Socrates would ultimately be put to death for his contradictory views of a sovereign that interferes with the prince’s absolute …show more content…
By doing this Socrates is a revolutionary man who wants change from dependence from what we know by ideology, but more towards scientific reasoning for things that can be proved. Socrates would want a ruler who is not just okay with what he is told, but to question it until there is evidence or reasoning behind the fact. Yet not to be stubbornly closed minded to new opposition with concern for reasoning of what he, the ruler, believes in. In the Prince Machiavelli writes for the prince’s “sentence to be irrevocable and let him adhere to his decisions so that no one may think of deceiving or cozening him”, which would suppress anything that Socrates would want to oppose (Prince, XIX, 67). The prince that Machiavelli describes is one that Socrates would see as close minded and unable to reason or question with. Machiavelli’s meaning may be more oriented for security of a prince to not be deceived by foes who would like to trick or confuse the prince into doing their bidding and overthrow. Which is a valid point, however it is paranoia that will be the result. This paranoia will lead to the prince to not listen to anyone including a sophisticated man of reason like Socrates. If a person were to point out that this quote instead means to not let another person apply their rule with the prince’s because that …show more content…
Socrates lives among many people that has deceived the public into thinking they are among the intelligent when after all they cannot answer the questions to prove their intelligence but inversely Socrates disproves them. Socrates opposes people that deceive the public and Machiavelli acknowledges that sometimes a prince must, and it is a good attribute to own. The Prince teaches that sometimes a smart prince that has odds stacked against him must deceive, which Socrates would oppose from his moral standpoint or character he possesses (Prince, XIX, 73). Socrates values are furthermore contradicted from Machiavelli, when Machiavelli infers when a prince lives like something of Socrates, the prince would be killed. In the prince, it states that when a leader lives nobly and shows great strength of character, it is a sign of their weakness that allows their subjects to conspire against him and be overthrown. Therefore, what Socrates would see as an excellent value to have in a sovereign, Machiavelli says to do the opposite because it is what leads to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For Socrates knows that Simonides would not agree that a crazy man should be given his weapon back simply because the weapon belong to the man. Socrates knows that Simonides must have a motive for reasoning and must mean something else, something that maybe Socrates cannot understand. Polemarchus then tries to explain to Socrates that what Simonides really meant is that the friends should only do well to each other, and not hurt each other. So then Socrates questions Polermarchus again and asks him if that means that if Simonides also mean that you should do harm to your enemies. Polermarchus says that that’s exactly what Simonides means and again Socrates does not agree with this definition of justice.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates would be unable to support a Machiavellian system because Machiavelli believes that the government should prioritize the feelings of citizens. In contrast, Socrates thinks that a government should prioritize the feelings and criticism of qualified people with political knowledge, such as nobles, while viewing the opinions of the masses with skepticism. Machiavelli states that in order for a leader to have long-lasting authority, they need to neglect the feelings of nobles and aristocrats, while prioritizing the requests and feelings of the citizens. (Prince, 9) This directly goes against the morals of Socrates in Crito. Crito tells Socrates to flee from the prison because of how the citizens of Athens would think of him if he did not.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates, like all men, seeks the good. If he and others embrace something other than the good, it cannot be because they voluntarily and willfully turn their backs on it” (Zuckert 228). It is also unjust because one of the accusers, Anytus whose son wanted to follow Socrates, did not allow his son to do so and so his son became an alcoholic. He blamed Socrates and used this as another example of Socrates corrupting the youth. Socrates was not corrupting the youth, but his teachings taught to question everything because you cannot be sure of anything.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates favors a more idealist approach that people should try to be good and that being good is the way to get the most out of life. Socrates even goes as far as saying that if one cannot act morally then there is no point to acting or that life may not be worth living. Machiavelli tries to avoid taking about how people should be good, instead focusing on how people are (inherently immoral) and instructing a leader how to be successful despite people. Socrates would not appreciate the prince or the system of government he creates but would still argue to preserve the government, but to change the laws instead of breaking…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates would be appalled at Machiavelli’s concept of a Prince. His ideas are in complete opposition to those Machiavelli presents in The Prince. Socrates would not support the political system that Machiavelli’s “ideal” Prince would lead. Where Socrates would want the sovereign to do whatever it takes to act justly and ethically, Machiavelli wants the Prince to do whatever is most prudent in order to safeguard his power and to ensure the continuation of his rule. Socrates said, “the unexamined life is not worth living” (Apology, 38a).…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because he believes man becomes disloyal to the state when times are tough, and the ultimate purpose of the Prince is to maintain order within the state, Machiavelli argues a ruler should be feared. If the prince is loved and circumstances warrant, people are more prone to take advantage of the benevolence of their ruler. Ruling with an iron fist, Machiavelli believes, would ensure obedience from the ruled. Moreover, he does also warn of the dangers of using fear in a negative manner. Never in The Prince does Machiavelli advocate using cruelty for no explicit reason, but instead urges rulers to use it in the interests of the state.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cave Vs Plato

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plato felt his teacher (Socrates) thought that Man should not trust his senses because they could be easily deceived (the prisoners believing only the shadows were real). Leading Man to make false assumptions about reality. Socrates prompts the reader to question their own beliefs regarding reality in collusion with his firm belief in introspection. Which he believed to be the only way of attaining true knowledge and not placing trust in our senses. I felt Socrates is very dominant in his assertions, smug even.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plato ignores or does not consider that the murder of the enlightened ruler could be detrimental to society, and so asserts that the philosopher king should pursue enlightening his citizens even at the risk of his own life. Machiavelli reasons that a good and just ruler putting his life at risk is ultimately risking that his citizens be taken over by someone with little idea of how to rule justly, a situation that is far more detrimental than any minor sins, such as not immediately forcing enlightenment on the public. For Machiavelli, there is a great deal of importance placed on the prince’s ability to maintain his state; he gives several situational pieces of advice regarding this in the earlier parts of The Prince when he discusses methods of obtaining…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He does not want to have his reputation stained or at least he is not going to see it happening. He has gone to politicians, poets, crafts maker and to wise men in general looking for their wisdom. He asks Athenians “do not make a disturbance, not even if I seem to you to be boasting somewhat” (Apology 20e). The worry of not wanting to be boasting implies the action of boasting being performed but also the desire of making it less noticeable by his listeners. Socrates does not want to be a politician but speaks like one when trying to convince the jury and by making sure his words do not give the wrong image.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli, in The Prince, claims that “it is much safer to be feared than loved, if one has to lack one of the two.” Trump chose fear, but he disregarded being loved as a component. The fear was accompanied with hate, leading to an unsuccessful attempt of Machiavelli’s thought within his current presidency. Machiavelli believed that “since men love at their convenience and fear at the convenience of the prince, a wise prince should found himself on what is his.” The people will not rise up against the prince if they fear him; he can control them in fear, not necessarily in love. Within Dr. Innes’s lecture on September 19, 2017, he discussed his interpretations of Machiavelli’s work. Two topics remain relevant to the discussion of Trump:…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays