• Home Page
  • Warren Buffet's Stop Coddling The Super-Rich

Warren Buffet's Stop Coddling The Super-Rich

Improved Essays
Show More
In the article “Stop Coddling the Super-Rich” Warren Buffet elucidates to the fact that the super-rich are not being taxed nearly enough as they need or should be. Buffet explains that government leaders have requested, even solicited shared sacrifice; however, they spared the mega rich. (227) He further states that the legislature sheltered the rich as if they are some kind of endangered species. (227) Warren indicates that he would leave rates for 99.7% of taxpayers unchanged, as well as continue the current 2-percentage-point reduction in the employee contribution to their payroll tax. This would help the poor and the middle class, who need every break they can get. (228) Lastly he states that he and his friends have been coddled far too long by a billionaire-friendly …show more content…
It is known that we as a nation give money to other nations who actually dislike us, this should stop. We also pay Social Security too many who don’t deserve it; my example is a cousin who had scoliosis and even after surgery, he sits on his royal… and collects a check while getting high on “legal” marijuana. I am sure he is not the only one. We as a nation are also slow to respond to disasters; that is where the mega rich should jump in and help. Furthermore, the mega-rich should be required to give to charity and contribute to local problems.
In summary, Warren Buffett wants the mega-rich to be taxed more than the poor and middle class. If I had his money I would not want to be taxed more because it is my money and I earned it; however, a flat tax for everyone would be of the greatest good to our nation as a whole. As I said earlier, I would continue donating to various charities and global projects, as well as set up scholarships for those truly in need, not merely based on their grades or how well they write an

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Carnegie's The Gospel Of Wealth
    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Andrew Carnegie's The Gospel Of Wealth

    In his 1889 review, Andrew Carnegie promoted what he called “The Gospel of Wealth”. He believed it was the obligation of those who accumulated to money to use it to promote the advancement of society. Like Carnegie, I believe that it is the responsibility of the 1% to use their wealth to aid the poor and not to buy lavish but pointless materialistic items. I believe that they should take it upon themselves to ensure that those who work hard will receive the opportunities…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Leonhardt's Inequality Has Been Going On Forever?
    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Leonhardt's Inequality Has Been Going On Forever?

    Wealthy owners can gather savings, and sustain their progressing patterns of income. To adjust this issue Leonhardt, (545), urges “a global wealth tax aimed more directly at capital inequality than income taxes currently are”, as a solution to inequality, however it will apply to those whose incomes are in the millions. Capital gains is the main source profit derives from it, and Leonhardt assumes that taxing capital is a way for the wealthy to pay their fair share in taxes. Although I agree with Leonhardt on taxing capital, I cannot accept his assumption that by doing so will cause much of a difference on the wealthy because they will find other ways to accumulate money without being…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Benefits Of Raising Taxes On The Rich
    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Benefits Of Raising Taxes On The Rich

    Raising the taxes on the wealthy would be a great option. The goal is not to tax them to the point of taking it all away, but making it fair, especially in times of struggle. Bob Herbert 2010, a New York Times columnist states that,” America does not have the common sense to raise taxes” (qtd. in King 614). I couldn’t agree more with his statement, as it seems like everyone is intimidated to raise taxes on the wealthy, or makes up excuses why we cannot do so. According to writer Dana Golden 2009, “the more wealth the rich accumulate, the more they will spend it, thereby stimulating the economy” (qtd. in King 614). Golden’s claim that the more wealth the rich have, the more they will spend it, rests upon the questionable assumption that they…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast Republican And Democratic Party
    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Republican And Democratic Party

    Or should the government reduce high taxes on the wealthy so they independently aid the middle and lower class? These questions have been debated by both the Republican and Democratic party over the years. For the Republican Party increasing corporate tax rates is a troublesome situation. With high taxes the companies investing in America don’t stand a chance to those other companies investing overseas. High taxes push companies to move abroad and make business elsewhere. This results in the loss of jobs and other financial investments. In reducing taxes Republicans believe that the economy will grow and prosper. In a Republicans stand point, those who have worked hard and succeed in investing shouldn’t be punished. Democrats, contrastively “believe the wealthiest Americans and largest corporations must pay their fair share of taxes.” Democrats are against those companies who walk out on America and don’t pay taxes, they believe that everyone should pay their fair share instead of hiding business abroad. Their goal is to create a transparent economy, away from terrorism and corruption. They argue that Donald Trump’s tax cuts on the wealthy will be at the expense of those in…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Idiot's Guide To Inequality, By Barbara Ehrenreich
    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Idiot's Guide To Inequality, By Barbara Ehrenreich

    In the article “An Idiot’s Guide to Inequality”, Steven A. Shaw explains how disregarded this issue is. According to Kristof, “Inequality causes problems by creating fissures in societies, leaving those at the bottom marginalized or disenfranchised.” This quote is stating that each social class is being taxed the same amount, causing the upper class to keep their wealth while the lower class loses the majority of theirs, spreading a need within the lower class for economic stability. Certain benefits to the upper class’ tax rate are offered that are not offered to the lower class’ tax rate. As stated in the article, “financiers are wealthy partly because they’re highly educated and hardworking— and also because they’ve successfully lobbied for the carried interest tax loophole that lets their pay be taxed at much lower rates than other people’s.” (Kristof). These benefits allow the upper class to pay less taxation than the lower class, and under certain circumstances, causes the lower class to pay additional taxation. In order to pay for this additional taxation and avoid financial debt, low-wage workers will frequently apply for numerous jobs and prioritize them over certain privileges, such as their living conditions. The quote also refers to the idea that the majority of the upper class received a superior education than that of the lower class, which facilitated the upper class’ financial success. Unfortunately, the United States “spends less educating the average poor child than the average rich one” (Kristof) which indicates the biased treatment of the social classes and provides an explanation for why it is challenging for the lower class to improve their social status. This article demonstrates that in contemporary society there is not only economic inequality but also unfair treatment of the different social classes that allow the upper class to be…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    We Are The 99.9 Percent By Paul Krugman Analysis
    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages

    We Are The 99.9 Percent By Paul Krugman Analysis

    The majority of American citizens are seeing their share of the pie shrink more and more, while a tiny portion of the populace is gaining funds and influence in leaps and bounds. Is it fair that less than 1% of the total population controls so much of the wealth and are given special considerations when it comes to tax laws? This can be debated back and forth until our faces turn blue. The real question is why are they given these favorable circumstances? Why should they be seen as better than the rest of us? Paul Krugman suggests, “…aside from shouts of ‘class warfare!’ whenever such questions are raised, the usual answer is that the super-elite are ‘job creators’- that is, that they make a special contribution to the economy” (para 8). Krugman,…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Gilded Age: A Short Story
    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Gilded Age: A Short Story

    We could conveniently do a form of the progressive tax where all types of income are taxed equally. As of right now, many of the ultra-rich are staying on top by finding a loophole in the tax system and exploiting it. They are investing in stocks and earning money that is classified as qualified dividends; these qualified dividends are taxed at a much lower rate, and, thus, the loophole is being surpassed without much creativity…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Dee Myers 'What Class Warfare Really Looks Like': Article Analysis
    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Dee Myers 'What Class Warfare Really Looks Like': Article Analysis

    “In the past decade the wealthiest percentile has seen its income grow by 17 percent.” (Myers) So let’s do the math. The 1 percent of the population that already controls 40 percent of the wealth continues to get richer but the poor is still being asked to pay more in taxes. While this is happening the mighty 1 percent continues to receive tax breaks to protect their fortunes. The UTA population needs to be informed about this. See, the game is rigged from the beginning. The American Dream is simply the title of a fictional movie that details what is possible if only people work hard. It seems that if individuals are not born into a family that already has money, win the lottery, or find a loop whole yourself, you are destined to be working to help provide the comforts of others. For generations, Americans who aren’t rich have been generous and admiring of their wealthy compatriots they want a country where people who work hard can succeed, where the same rules apply to everyone. They expect to have their own shot at getting rich. But increasingly, they are seeing that the game is…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    How Did Bernie Sanders Control The United States?
    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Did Bernie Sanders Control The United States?

    “Sanders and his $18 trillion dollar proposal comes from things that the people are already paying for in taxes” (Waldman). Sanders wants to change the way we pay for taxes. For example, today college is paid for by the students and what Sanders would do to guarantee free college tuition would be for it to be paid the same way that we pay for roads, parks, schools, and other things through our taxes. “Sanders also wants to spend $1 trillion over ten years on infrastructure” (Waldman). It will create new jobs and has it benefits over time. Republicans believe that by a higher tax rate on the wealthy will delay the growth of the economy. Yet, “Economists have pointed out that post-war American growth has been higher during periods with much higher top marginal tax rates...”(Covert) Taxing the wealthy at a 90 percent would help to lower the unfairness of wealth and everyone’s wellbeing would improve, equally for both the rich and poor. Many other Republican presidential candidates have also agreed with Sanders proposal and have backed up his…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Wealth Inequality Essay
    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Wealth Inequality Essay

    In 1976 , the wealthiest one percent of Americans owned 19% of all the private material wealth in the US Today, they own over 40% of all wealth. Their share now exceeds the wealth owned by the bottom 92% of the US population combined. (Edward N. Wolff, Top Heavy: A Study of Increasing Inequality in America Twentieth Century Fund: 1995). From 1976 till the present , the power of the wealthy has increased greatly meaning their power has increased as well. When a certain group constantly gains power they will abuse it and this can be seen with the unfair wealth distribution in this country. Although each person has the right to make as much money as possible, in the United States the government should however keep the income rise proportioned by taxing the wealthy more and the poor less. In recent years the opposite happened where the taxes on the wealthy were cut from a top rate of 68% in 1980s to 28.5% by 1988. The share of federal tax revenue paid by corporations has dropped from 33 cents of every dollar collected in 1953 to less than 10 cents today. (Donald Barlett and James Steele: America: Who Really Pays the Taxes? Andrews and McMeel:…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Wealth Inequality In America
    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Essay On Wealth Inequality In America

    As a capitalist nation, the United State of America is facing a serious problem, which is the inequality of wealth and income. In pace with the growth of the economy, the rich people are getting richer and the poor people are getting poorer. The gap between the rich and poor is widening unprecedentedly fast. Why is that happening? Most of the rich people believe the strategy of trickle down economic. When their corporations earn money, and they can create more job opportunities for the lower class people. However, the goal of trickle down has never existed. The wine stayed on the top cup. As Nicholas Fitz expressed in the article “Economic Inequality: It’s Far Worse Than You Think” People have no idea how worse is the gap between the rich people and the poor people.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Essay On Flat Tax
    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Essay On Flat Tax

    Flat tax provides choice, saves time, and restores fairness to the tax code. Proposal of a flat tax say that it would eliminate features of the tax code that could give taxpayers a hard time in filing taxes to the IRS. Under the flat tax system, American taxpayers will benefit by dealing with a simple tax that is easy to understand and report since it taxes all income at a flat rate. In summary, a flat tax would benefit businesses by reducing compliance costs and by stimulating economic activity. Income taxes would increase for many businesses, but eliminating the second layer of taxes on capital income would partially compensate business owners for the increase. Economists’ estimates of lower compliance costs and increases in economic activity suggest these factors would be more important than the tax increase. Overall, the flat tax would generally be positive for…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Progressive Taxation
    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Progressive Taxation

    Although taxes have been in existence for around 5,000 years, many educated people are still left wondering who should have to pay what. (“Taxes”) The main idea that leaves large quantities of people divided is progressive taxation. Progressive taxation is the concept that the wealthy people of a nation should be responsible for paying their taxes at higher rates. While George F. Will expresses his negative thoughts about progressive taxation, George Lakoff and Bruce Budner are strong advocates behind this philosophy of progressive taxation. Despite the contrast in their opinions, their articles clearly demonstrate that they believe that their ideas will be best for both the wealthy and the economy of the United States as a whole.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Should The Rich Be Taxed
    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Should The Rich Be Taxed

    With America’s economy struggling, many citizens believe that the rich should be taxed more to help fix the economy. This issue has caused a division between those who believe the rich should be taxed more and those who do not. For example, when voting for presidents, this problem is a major factor of who gets voted into office. The reason that the rich can be taxed without the rest of the country being taxed is, America’s income tax system is set up by using a graduated tax bracket. This means that the more money a person makes, the higher the percentage of money they have to pay. The rich should not be taxed more because they already pay the highest percentage of their money to taxes, the government does not spend money wisely, and the rich…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Rich Should Pay More In Taxes Essay
    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Rich Should Pay More In Taxes Essay

    For decades one question has continuously came up― should the rich pay a higher tax rate because of their wealth? There are two separate types of rich. There are those who inherit the money, and those who have worked hard and strived to be a successful person. Therefore, to answer the question previously stated, higher tax rates should not pertain to the ones who made sacrifices to become wealthy. A vast majority of the people who become wealthy gave their time, money and effort to become self-made, successful people. Of course people could say, “Yes, the rich should pay more in taxes because they have more money than I do.” However, they only look at the small percent of the upper class who inherited the money, and so called “cheated their…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings