War On Terror Analysis

Amazing Essays
The relationship between U.S. foreign policy and terror during the late Cold War, gives a historical understanding to help make a more informed political analysis of the “War on Terror” today. The “War on Terror” today is demonstrated through terrorism. Targeting civilians, political motives all have direct involvement involvement in the root of all terrorism. Acts man be direct or indirect but terrorism is defined as, “An act or acts designed to provoke an overreaction from a stronger power”. Through the historical understanding of the relationship between U.S. foreign policy and terror during the late Cold War; a more informed political analysis can be developed on the “War on Terror” today while using; Americas attitude toward political …show more content…
Terrorism is defined as “an intentional act or acts of violence of sabotage targeting individuals or groups, especially civilians”. Terrorism nearly always has “political motives” and the primary targets almost always being civilians. Certain kinds of violence horrify the “modern sensibility, while others do not. “The modern sensibility sees most political violence as necessary to historical progress”. Looking back, the French Revolution brought terror, along with bringing a citizens’ army. The men of the army were “willing to die for a cause of greater value to him than life itself”. Mamdani notes that it should be added that, “man is also willing to kill for such a cause”. The modern sensibility of can not be measured by progress as Mamdani states, “the modern sensibility is not horrified by pervasive violence. The world wars are proof enough of this. What horrifies our modern sensibility is violence that appears senseless, that cannot be justified by progress”. For obvious reason certain kinds of violence do horrify the “modern sensibility” but just symbolize pure evil. Such as, “the violence of the Holocaust, for example, is explained as simply the result of evil”. The reason the Holocaust does horrify “modern sensibility” is due to the link …show more content…
For instance, Mamdani uses “Culture Talk” to “suggest a different way of thinking about political Islam”. Mamdani also explains that Culture Talk “assumes that every culture has a tangible essence that defines it, and it then explains politics as a consequence of that essence. Culture Talk after 9/11, for examples, qualified and explained the practice of “terrorism” as “Islamic””. There are two versions of Culture Talk, “It claims to interpret politics from culture, in the present and throughout history, but neither version of Culture Talk is substantially the work of a historian”. Hollywood has a stereotype of Arabs portrayed throughout some of their films. In the short film “Reel Bad Arabs: How Hollywood Vilifies a People”, Dr. Jack Shaheen makes an effort to point out their shameful stereotypes, he comments saying they are “portrayed as sub-humans”. Ranging from adult films all the way to “Aladdin”, a children film, directors go out of there way to portray Arabs, with most of these movies having nothing to do with the Middle East. Hollywood releases a mass amount of movies and “nearly 25% of all Hollywood movies” portray Arabs as either a joke or reference a stereotype about them. In cartoons, they are portrayed as “stock villains” and used for “comedic relief”. Some of the light stereotypes show “magic carpets” or “programming snakes in and out of baskets” (Dr. Jack Shaheen).

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    First is that they define terrorism as murder that unjustifiable and wrong. This makes people come to a moral confusion to quickly that terrorism is always a horrible act. The second difficulty is that it is often use as a “dirty word” or political weapon. Ordinary English makes naturally has fear in coercion in the word terrorism to make terrorism that makes us draw conclusion that makes terrorism always sound like it is an unjustifiable violent act. Valls quotes Carl Wellman’s use of the word terrorism a “ the attempted use of terror for purposes of…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The concept of terrorism has been evident throughout history. Terrorism, deriving from the term “terror”, (Giddens : 2009 : 1055) refers to using unauthorised violence and intimidation, causing fear within populations, normally in pursuit of a political goal. Terrorism is therefore using methods of violence to terrorise countries or populations for the purpose to destabilise governmental power and to show forms of national - identity. Terrorism is a subject well studied within the fields of law, political studies and international studies, (Deflem : 2004:75) for the purpose of counter terrorism policy making, Typically, terrorism has been understudied in field of sociology, However, since the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington by…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    there has to be a super power behind, who is funding terrorist and paying them under the table to commence such acts against entire world, "to achieve its strategic objectives ". The author uses ample emotional appeals in the article to convince audience and define who are the terrorist in reality. "If someone kills or torture someone is called terrorist, but if someone else targets villages and countryside is not terrorist, but is called protector of human rights" (Afghan paper calls on USA to define what terrorism is, 2007, paragraph 6). The author pointing out USA presence in Afghanistan and Iraq in the name of war on terror. this has pro and cons as it demolish terrorist territories/ structure but at the same time it cause hundreds of innocents casualties in the country side.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Khalid Sheikh Mohammed the logic of war Basically war is a conflict between two sovereign countries or a fight for independent. War has negative impact over the society. If there is war between two countries, people get killed, hungry, and there is no development. Selfishness is the most reason of war, on the other hand some people involve on war to get their independent. Mohammed claims there is language behind any war.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Domestic Terrorism Domestic terrorism is an ongoing threat to the homeland security of the United States. Homegrown terrorists, influenced by radical ideologies from international terrorist groups, top the list of hazards the citizens and U.S. law enforcement should prepare for. Most domestic terrorism strikes are conducted by one person or a small group. Domestic terrorists want to coerce or frighten a civilian population and disrupt a country’s government. Multiple causes influence domestic terrorists and their actions.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Applied to the events in Paris and other similar terror attacks, idealism tries to ask relatively simple questions like what are the reasons that push people to turn to terrorism. Why the majority of the world is horrified and considers these acts as criminal while terrorist are ready to give up their life to participate in violent actions? Finding the answer to these questions is only the first step. Addressing the influence of terrorism does not establish a solution but can help directing soft power actions to defuse the roots of terrorism. Investing in education and cooperation rather than military threat or retaliation will lead in the long term to de- radicalize terrorist and their potential…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is part of symbolic violence, and it is mostly seen in the aftermath of 9/11. It made people ask questions of the government that had not been asked before and created a large historical event for people to use to question all motives. Symbolic violence is used to gain attention, and Al-Qaeda gained a huge amount of attention after the attack. Al-Qaeda used this attack to gain attention with the sympathizers, people who were potentially interested in this type of violence already could find an outlet with Al-Qaeda. The terrorist also intended to recruit sympathizers.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The true definition of terrorism is unconventional warfare involving the use or threat of violence by non-state actors, typically against a non-military target, with the intent of instilling fear in a broader audience (Haider-Markel, Donald). A large group of domestic terrorism in America was the KKK. The president reinstated the habeas corpus eliminating reasoning behind arresting people. President Bush signed the USA PATRIOT Act, which greatly increased government authority to respond to domestic and international terrorism by expanding the power and authority of law enforcement and intelligence agencies (Haider-Markel,…

    • 1935 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Terrorism And Conflict

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the article, “Terrorism and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict”, Jerome Slater studied the effects terrorism had on the Israeli- Palestinian conflict. He contends that while terrorism is ethically wrong, it is both conceivable and alluring to recognize degrees of good misleading quality. Slater realizes both Israel and the Palestinians have turned to terrorism at different times during the course of their long conflict; After studying a wide diagram of this history of common fear mongering, he concluded the direct of both sides in wording drawn from the simply war custom. These are noble motivation, final resort or the accessibility of other options to fear based oppression to achieve a worthwhile motivation, and the likelihood that psychological…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Narrative on Terrorism Humanity is going through a difficult period. A period that could decide the future of the upcoming generations. In time of fear, people tend to hear screams from one side blaming the Muslims and the other side putting on the blame on the West. The Muslims are as much as at fault as the Western governments are. The relationship of the United States and Europe with terror supporting tyrannical government like Saudi Arabia and Kuwait are as much a cover for terrorism as the Muslims who carry the ideology that was established on terror (Bronson).…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics