Using Scholarly Sources In Academic Research

Improved Essays
According to (Davis 2003; Metzger, Flanagin, and Zwarun 2003.) Scholars are using the Internet as their primary way to collect information and many of them struggle distinguishing or look past credibility. Credibility is important and it is also important to critically analyze sources for a variety of reasons. You want to ensure that the source you’re getting your information is credible. You want to ensure that the information you’re using is backed up. You also want to make sure the source you’re using is the best one for that particular subject Another key aspect you should always keep an eye on is the date. Some source though good, can be dated and there’s newer information that could be used. It’s never a bad thing to use any good source but it’s always good to keep the date in mind. …show more content…
Typically scholars are experts in the field they are writing about, very knowledgeable and are very well written. They also are writing for an academic purpose and are more reliable and credible than other web based sources. You want to ensure you’re using the best and most appropriate

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    With the amount of information available today, there must be a systematic approach to understanding how critical it is to differentiate between academic and popular sources and what makes them credible. This week’s…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So first you find your research of the the topic you are looking for and you evaluate your believability. When you are evaluating information, you look at the author and where it is published. Government websites, peer reviewed journals, google scholar, and EBSCOHOST are much reliable sources than any other websites. Finally when you evaluate you have to support your writing by proper documentation. This means you have to cite your sources and have to use citation machine to properly cite my sources.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mid-Term A Highly Unlikely Scenario is the story of a man named Leonard, who works as a pizza complaint man. Leonard’s entire job revolves around listening to others about their complaints. It’s obvious that Leonard isn’t and can’t be an opinionated person but the readers discover that Leonard does eventually find his voice. Other characters include a sister named Carol, her son Felix, and a man named Milione, who soon becomes known as Marco Polo.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In considering the two types of sources—primary and secondary—I think that each has their strengths. However, I think that primary sources are ultimately the best way to learn about the past, because they are more memorable, more interesting, and easier to empathize with. The first advantage to primary sources is that they are more memorable. The point of history, of course, is to learn about the past, and so this is an important concern.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The domain of the source is “.gov” which means the US Government is in control of the website. An assumption can be made that all the information is legitimate, because it is under the supervision of the government. The author of the article is Mae Bowen, however there is no background knowledge of the author. The author has a bias tone towards the topic, which is the Civil Rights Act. The tone the author presents about the topic is positive.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He welcomes criticism: “You should be skeptical of my skepticism.” However, I agree with his criticisms, and I recognize their truth with a heavy heart. The Internet is not the printing press, it has not brought great literature to the world, or at least, not alone. Along with the wisdom of the ages has come a hodge-podge of absolutely everything anyone has ever thought of; Dante and Shakespeare digitally float alongside 13-year-old me’s inane ramblings on LiveJournal. Peer-reviewed literature must compete for legitimacy with unverifiable conspiracy nonsense, and every single day I hear “Oh yeah,…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When doing research on a paper you are writing you find yourself asking if a website is credible or not. You may think it is not credible because of how the website is layed out or that the information is so old that it doesn't apply today. If you find yourself asking that question then you need to look at what makes a source credible. The things to determine whether a website is credible or not is authority, accuracy, and currentisity of that specific website.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I needed some reliable sources that I knew I could trust, so while looking I needed to find websites that I could classify as a journal article or a professional academic paper. Just something that was stable and also had be written by a professional. I steered myself completely away from things like raw information or and propaganda. I specifically stuck to websites that were provided by the school so I knew that I was getting the best information possible and if I didn’t use a source from the school I would only use the website it had .org, .NET, and .Gov. When I found a website that I thought was reliable and something I could trust I would rate it on its quality, media literacy source, and other considerations.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Scholarly Writing Style

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Over 15 years ago, Robert Nash (2011) developed a new academic writing style called Scholarly Personal Narrative (SPN). For the first time in academics the unacceptable use of the ‘subjective I [me]’was acceptable in scholarly writing. Before SPN only the ‘objective they [we]’ was appropriate for research because scholars believed that only experts could support an agreeable or disagreeable topic. Nash (2011) wanted SPN to become, “a respectable research genre in higher education, particularly in the professional schools” (p. 4), so he wrote his first book, Liberating Scholarly Writing: The Power of Personal Narrative (2004).…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After watch the two short video my considerations are, Wikipedia, an online information center, has in a general sense changed the substance of reference books and shrewd journals over the span of the latest ten years. It is quickly taking books, journals, and money out of the condition for examination. Wikipedia has made another way to deal with amass information, casual association, and do ask about. Notwithstanding the way that Wikipedia has its positive uses it is not for the most part a strong source and is best used as a starting stage for investigation.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1. Reliable source: a source with accurate information that has been consistently confirmed over and over again throughout the past to have accurate/precise information Example: An example of a reliable source would be the CIA World Factbook. This is a credible source because it is a government website. Other credible source could include academic journals, Purdue Owl, other government websites, etc. 2.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Authoritative vs. Popular Sources: Insight into choosing the most accurate sources for the Nursing Discipline Writing in the Nursing Discipline is strict on making sure information is accurate and up to date. Medicine grows throughout our history as new advances in technology and techniques are discovered. When researching in the nursing discipline it is essential to use an authoritative source. An authoritative source is a credible source in which is proven to be accurate.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Stand Against Wikipedia by Scott Jaschik draw attention on how students should not use Wikipedia as a resources due to its inaccuracy details and lack completeness entries. In his article he emphasize, “ As Wikipedia has become more and more popular with students, some professors have become increasingly concerned about the online, reader- produced encyclopedia.” Scott have a point where there is plenty of inaccuracy details, but that’s not accurate at all. If the person gathered enough sources that seemingly relates one to the other, then there the sources surely is accurate. Basically, don’t rely on one resources, the researchers needs plenty of resources in order for him or her to make a case or support his or her idea.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The internet contains a numerous range of information with a touch of a button from a computer or other electronic device. The range of information found online can vary from credibility, bias, and other factors. Not only is the availability of information simplified, most tend to…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Academic researcher, Danah Boyd, argues in her article, “Wikipedia as a Site of Knowledge Production”, of how using Wikipedia as a credible source should be accepted. Many students have been told to steer away from Wikipedia, but Boyd does a superb job of discussing how the information on Wikipedia is easy to understand, it is new and frequently evolving, and it is less bias than books. Some may say that Wikipedia isn’t credible because people can always change the information at any time, but Wikipedia has taken security measure to fix that problem. Boyd has mostly good evidence that proves that Wikipedia is a good source because it is knowledgeable and is able to fix their security problems with the use of examples of logos and…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays