The author got an inside look to how things were for soldiers and pilots during the war. I feel like his sources were extremely valuable, because they gave us a deeper connection to the people in the story. If we had not gotten such great detail, I don’t think we would have felt the same about the story. The author of Catch 22 is slightly biased because the story is told from the point of view of a soldier. If it was told from the point of view from an officer, it would not have dug so deep into the problem of government corruption. The author showed us how life was for a specific kind of person in the war and mainly focused on them. It did not show the points of view of everyone in the
The author got an inside look to how things were for soldiers and pilots during the war. I feel like his sources were extremely valuable, because they gave us a deeper connection to the people in the story. If we had not gotten such great detail, I don’t think we would have felt the same about the story. The author of Catch 22 is slightly biased because the story is told from the point of view of a soldier. If it was told from the point of view from an officer, it would not have dug so deep into the problem of government corruption. The author showed us how life was for a specific kind of person in the war and mainly focused on them. It did not show the points of view of everyone in the