• Home Page
  • Universal Norms: Cultural Or Moral Relativism?

Universal Norms: Cultural Or Moral Relativism?

Improved Essays
Show More
Cultural or moral relativism cannot be correct as all humans share and follow universal norms as they live their everyday lives. Each individual is faced with decisions at time to time, and they make their decision based on what they believe is correct. Most of the things that humans believe in, which are correct, relate back to universal norms. If groups or majorities believe something is right and they teach or praise this belief around the world it can be known as a universal norm (Demuijnck, 2015). It is the human understanding that committing a murdering upon another human being is completely wrong and should not be done. It is one of the many universal norms that are played out in life. Another universal norm that all humans understand

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Divine Nature Theory
    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Divine Nature Theory

    Subsequently, if a person or culture deems that murder or slavery is morally correct, ethical relativism holds that the actions are morally correct. Further, if one believes that ethical relativism is morally correct and another believes that it is incorrect,…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Theories Of Moral Relativism
    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Theories Of Moral Relativism

    I believe that it is common sense to disagree with moral relativism solely on the fact that it accepts racism, genocide of groups, even murder, as justifiable as long as that is what the group values to be right or acceptable. Having the beliefs of a moral relativist, you could go so far as to say that a group or culture could decide that starting a nuclear war was morally just, and that we as people outside of that group could not criticize those people for their actions. If ethical relativism is to be completely true, there can be no common ground for resolving moral disputes or for reaching an agreement on moral matters between members of different cultures. When it comes to justifying moral relativism, there is no decision procedure that can demonstrate the objective truth or falsity of moral judgments. On the contrary, moral objectivism, also known as moral absolutism, encompasses ethical theories that support the objectivity of moral values and norms.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Mordidas From A Cultural Relativism Perspective
    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mordidas From A Cultural Relativism Perspective

    1a. Cultural relativism is the view that no culture is superior to any other culture when comparing systems of morality, law, politics, etc. (AllAboutPhilosophy.org, n.d.) It does not offer a universal right and wrong, but rather offers the notion of morals based on the cultural environment. This diverges from the traditional ethical theories of doing what is right and adopts the ethical theories that are the “lay of the land” as they relate to the local culture in which the dilemma takes place.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Is Ethical Relativism True?
    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Is Ethical Relativism True?

    I believe that ethical relativism is not true and the reason I believe this is because it is conflicting to say the same rule is to be considered right in one society and wrong in another. If “right” and…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against Moral Relativism
    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Arguments Against Moral Relativism

    Yes many people have agreed not to kill others, but it is not because it is right or wrong, but because humans generally like living and do not want other people to take their life away from them or anyone they love. Agreeing not to kill people is a survival tactic so we can build a functioning society and improve our quality of life. All things that are “right” are because they help us in some way. An argument against moral relativism is that if nothing is right or wrong could we improve?…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Adrift In A Moral Sea Analysis
    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Adrift In A Moral Sea Analysis

    Relativism can be subjective, which is the view that an action is morally right if one approves of it or it can be cultural, the view that an action is right if one’s culture approves of it. As long as a person has approval for an action it will be considered the right action for them to make. Not every relativist is going to have morally correct beliefs because what seems right to one person may seem wrong to another. For example, some cultures believe that there is nothing wrong with committing crimes such as murder, rape, stealing because this is what is accepted and seen as normal in their culture. When looking at criterion 1 of moral criteria of adequacy, this theory appears to be inconsistent with considered judgments because what one person approves of can be seen as immorally incorrect.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ruth Benedict's Theory Of Moral Cultural Relativism
    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ruth Benedict's Theory Of Moral Cultural Relativism

    Moral Cultural Relativism is based on the belief that there is no universal morality, it is based entirely on the traditions of the culture one lives in. This is a subject that is up for debate amongst philosophers. While there can never be a definite conclusion either way, many people have strong opinions on what they feels is the right form of relativism. Ruth Benedict’s theory of moral relativism is based in the common practices and beliefs of cultures. She describes morality as something that is wholly individual to cultures, and which cannot be criticized by members of other cultures.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism Essay
    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moral Relativism Essay

    Although this concept isn’t great for our society, it has a greater success outcome compared to absolutism. In Mary Midgley’s article, she discusses the issues with moral relativism. She claims that although moral relativism doesn’t have the greatest outcome, it is a way to view different cultures. Every culture does something based on their religion and or…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Murder Is Murder Wrong
    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Murder Is Murder Wrong

    People in America realized that murder is unlawful and that they could get sent to prison for committing such a crime. However, cultural relativism claims that society determines whether murder is right or wrong. For example, the Aztec civilization believed murder was ok because they were honoring god with human…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Examples Of Moral Skepticism
    • 2047 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Examples Of Moral Skepticism

    Moral Skepticism is the belief that it is impossible to truly know if morals are absolute and that nobody can have any knowledge of absolute truth at all. Additionally, if evolutionary theory is true, then there are more good reasons to be moral skeptics. This is due to the notion that evolution will pressure all living things to adapt to their territory and environment so that they are fit for survival. In addition, this survival and fitness-enhancing pressures may not be truth-conductive because what a species needs to survive could contrast with another sect of that same species. Therefore, by this logic, the absoluteness and objectivity of moral beliefs cannot be known.…

    • 2047 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism And Culture
    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Relativism And Culture

    “Different cultures have different moral codes”, James Rachels discusses in his article Why Morality Is Not Relative? (160). Moral codes differ from culture to culture and each culture tends to have their own individual standards. Cultural relativism is said to be “moral rules differ from society to society” (18). Cultural relativism can be looked at as a theory based on nature of morality. Each culture has their own moral codes, typically created by their ancestors.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    James Rachels's Theory Of Cultural Relativism
    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    James Rachels's Theory Of Cultural Relativism

    Cultural relativism may be defined as a theory that advocates the idea of subjective morality. To extrapolate, this theory entails that “different cultures have differing moral codes” and these variances are merely arbitrary. Although this is a seemingly sufficient theory, there are key issues with this school of thought. James Rachels suggests several issues with accepting cultural relativism. He criticizes cultural relativism by stating that the theory is absurd as it entails severe consequences if practiced.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Relativism Research Paper
    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ethical Relativism Research Paper

    Philosophy paper on relativism and weather I agree or disagree In the following paper I will be discussing relativism, more specifically cultural and ethical relativism and weather I agree or disagree with that philosophy. Cultural revisits state that “no particular moral or ethical position can actually be considered “right” or “wrong.” Ethical relativism states that …”whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced”. I agree with ethical and cultural relativism because there is no right or wrong moral code because people and societies have different beliefs.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    William Graham Sumner's Acception To Ethical Relativism
    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages

    William Graham Sumner's Acception To Ethical Relativism

    If we follow that, then it is impossible for us to say any culture’s ethical beliefs are better or worse than any other. Think about that if we live in 200 years ago when slavery still exist, relativist would believe that the slavery is the right thing since it is believed by most of people at that time. While, we know that slavery no longer exist in our country now, and we do think that is an improvement compare to what we did before. However, there are still some parts of world that slavery still exist; and according to relativism we cannot find any moral position to criticize them since whatever their culture believes should be considered right. However, it would be irrational and absurd to think there is no morally difference between slavery and freedom.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Morality In Different Cultures
    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Morality In Different Cultures

    The nature of morality is very relative across the many different cultures in the world. Different cultures have different ways of how they view some practices of what is moral and what is not moral or ethical. And philosophers and anthropologists who study different people and their cultures have a way of rationally thinking about this topic of morality, by saying that morality cannot be viewed by one culture as correct and the other culture as wrong but it can be thought as diverse and that no one culture is either right or wrong. The truth in morality is not universal at all.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings