Moral relativism

Moral relativism is a commonly held position among many. This could be due to the regard for the value of tolerance or the truth in descriptive moral relativism. But my argument will be against meta-ethical moral relativism: there exists moral truths but these truths are not absolutes but relative. If morality is relative, there is no ultimate right or wrong. Because, there isn’t an objective point of reference to differentiate between right and wrong. If one were to examine subjective morals, it could constitute two specific features - moral feelings and practical reasoning. Therefore so long as these two criteria are met, any action based on moral judgements can be justified as morally right or wrong. However this seems quite strange to…

Moral relativism is the view that ethical judgments are valid or false just in respect to some specific viewpoint and that no point of view is particularly favored over all others. It has frequently been related with different cases about profound quality: eminently, the proposal that distinctive societies regularly show fundamentally extraordinary good esteems; the refusal that there are all inclusive good esteems shared by each human culture; and the request that we should avoid passing good…

For the most part, I believe Americans would like to make decisions based on moral absolutism as that seems to be right decision to make, but in all reality, guidance is based on moral relativism due to so many variables that take place today. Ruth Benedict discusses in A Defense of Ethical Relativism what various cultures viewed as a moral absolutism in a particular part of the world but may be seen as moral relativism in another part. Benedict discussed homosexuality as being accepted in the…

In a world where we witness many tragedies and many achievements there are lingering questions on why we make certain actions and not others. There must be a way to find the source of our morals because we seem to make similar actions through time. Many of the attempts to name what the source of our morality are rejected due to dilemmas and challenged premises, but strongest among them all is Moral Relativism. The argument for Moral Relativism is the strongest argument for discovering what…

It is that which society has approved.” Moral absolutism is the ethical belief that there are absolute standards against which moral questions can be judged, and that certain actions are right or wrong, regardless of the context of the act. Moral relativism is when there are deep and widespread moral disagreements across different societies, and these disagreements are much more significant than whatever agreements there may be. I believe America could use moral relativism. Every society has a…

referred to morals, but there are many different branches tied to the common ground of morals. One of the branches of morals is moral realism which states that there are “objective moral facts (Atheism And The City).” These are the morals that have been engraved into our conscience so it seems like it is common sense that wrongful actions are indeed wrongful and vice versa for rightful actions. While this branch of morals is based off of concrete facts, meaning it is easier to teach to younger…

Moral relativism is a view that moral or ethical standards are different for each person and that no one’s opinion of right and wrong is better than another. Moral relativism is said to be “the view that ethical standards, morality, and positions of right or wrong are culturally based and therefore subject to a person's individual choice” (moral-relativism.com). What is right for them is what they believe to be ethical. Since moral relativism is culturally based, different cultures will have…

The theories of Moral Relativism and Moral Objectivism are quite different. In Moral Relativism, what is right and what is wrong is not set in stone, each person and each culture can have it’s own definition of right and wrong. Moral Objectivism states that there is no variation in right and wrong and that right and wrong is set across all people, cultures, and time periods. David Hume’s theory fits in with Moral Relativism. Hume’s Sentimentalism is based off of the idea that feelings,…

Moral relativism is a very vague and unclear moral theory, this leaves many questioning the significance of the theory. The topic of moral relativism is very confusing and the thought process behind the theory is muddled. It is wrong to assert that there is no standard of morality, that morality is made truth through an individual’s view on right and wrong. This means no person’s morality is better than another. So judgment cannot be given in any situation and no change would occur due to the…

McDowell Bellevue University Assignment 5.1 It is not an easy, in fact it is almost impossible, to choose between moral absolutism and moral relativism as a guide that the American society should use for making moral decisions. Both moral relativism and moral absolutism offer solutions to moral problems, but each will give completely different answers to the problem. Many great philosophers in history have debated on one side or another. In my opinion I side with the anthropologist Ruth…