Arguments Against Moral Relativism

Improved Essays
I think moral relativism is a sound theory. There is no wrong or right and people have just made it up to make their lives easier and better. It is a worthy theory because one cannot test for something that is right or wrong and people do things because it helps them or it makes them think more highly of themselves. If I said stealing was right could you prove to me that it was actually wrong? Ethics is not like science where someone can run some tests and figure out the answer. Because everyone has different experiences and different lives there will never be two people who think the exact same thing and because of this there will never be universal ethics.
If you believe that there is a right and wrong in this world could you prove it? If I go out a kill someone nothing bad is going to happen to me. I’m not going to get some incurable illness or struck by
…show more content…
The only reason why I would be punished is because of human law. Humans say that it is wrong to kill people because they themselves don’t want to be killed. Rachels says, “There are some moral rules that all societies will have in common, because those rules are necessary for society to exist.”(Rachels, 22). Yes many people have agreed not to kill others, but it is not because it is right or wrong, but because humans generally like living and do not want other people to take their life away from them or anyone they love. Agreeing not to kill people is a survival tactic so we can build a functioning society and improve our quality of life. All things that are “right” are because they help us in some way.
An argument against moral relativism is that if nothing is right or wrong could we improve? I think we can improve, but it has nothing to do

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    These principles are basic examples of things that he, and many others, consider to always be right. They include not killing innocent people, telling the truth, and obeying just laws. (p.178) These principles are things that improve society, and improve the lives of the people living in those societies. Pojman also mentions the connection of morality and the promotion of pleasure over pain. (p.182) For these reasons, Pojman will never concede to Benedict’s views of morality, and he will not be convinced that beating someone up just for fun can be considered…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hesiod believed that human beings could improve their lot if they embraced justice, which is the best thing they have”. I see this statement as even though Hesiod was cheated by his brother, he would rather preach the ways of virtue than turn it into a fight. A fight or slaughter would be lowering one’s moral standards in not being the bigger person. In our world today we base our opinion on others due to their moral values (virtue). If someone is belittling another, that is seen as having little to no self-esteem or self-value.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Claim Analysis

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It is believed that right actions will lead one to become a well being of an individual. This theory is believed that one needs happiness in their life. As I said before what causes this happiness that leads to a good life. Each person has a different way of satisfying his or her needs therefore this theory is pointless. If a person is going to perform a crime that makes one happy, even though in the eyes of the law it is wrong to do it, then how does this justify moral facts to be genuine, objective feature of the world?…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human beings are rational creatures that would intensitivity defend themselves. A Human Being would have no reason to place tolerance toward someone else 's morals over their own safety. For example society deems it immoral to kill other people but will deem it as an understandable action if it was done to protect oneself. The undermining of moral confidence that relativism can cause serves only to ensure that people do not approach a situation believing that they are morally superior but rather approach it with an open mind. Moreover, it is not clear people are less motivated about non-universal values beliefs.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It also discourages people to become driven by unfriendly competition. People are encouraged to build a solid positive mental outlook towards life. In short, positive psychology can help lead to a successful life by making the person more aware of his or her choices and beliefs. We are encouraged to look at our situations, strengths and limitations, from a sober and level-headed foundation of happiness. It is less about magical or pseudo-scientific laws but more about recognizing our real situations as human beings in a human…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each Little Step Changes the World Giving back to your community does not only make you feel good, but it is also fun! Community service has made me a better person. It has helped me realize money can’t buy everything, but the will and desire inside of people can. It is not something one can buy. People who do community service are a group who have the will and are kind enough to care to make the world a better place.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Deontologists would argue that there are certain rules that ought not be broken, even if they were to raise the overall happiness or pleasure of a community. Killing the healthy patient in this transplant case would be an example of a rule that ought not be broken, because most people generally believe that killing an innocent person is intuitively wrong. Although different deontologists make different distinctions on what laws ought not be broken, the general consensus is that not all actions that raise utility level should be…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some of them filled with ego and selfishness and some are kind hearted and selfless people, both are there. Morality or justice plays a pivotal role in our society to maintain the balance and peace among society and also makes a society a better place to live. If the whole society is immoral or unjust then there would be a chaos and it will become worthless to live there. Morality, we can call it norms but which are innate by nature note learned or it is kind of reinforcement by teaching. People don’t do injustice because they have fear of law or they don’t want listed their name in the criminal records, otherwise if the government give free rights to do what ever they want to do, they are just afraid of consequences of getting caught or acting unjustly .…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical egoism varies from other ethical positions since it proposes that the enthusiasm of others anything to never be an element in good choice making. An ethical egoist accepts that helping others is not an ethical activity and that they anything to help other people just seeing that it would offer an advantage over the long haul. If it does not better me I “morally” do not have to do it. So, if killing, torturing, or robbing someone will help me better myself then morally right. The book claims that ethical egoism cannot be true because it requires killing rape, or theft just because actions of this promote self- interest.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also argues that a completely ethical person will not be conflicted about his ethical choice, opposite of Kant, who thinks that a person can make an ethical choice while desiring the wrong alternative. In fact, he prefers that, because it shows that the person is doing his duty, not the action just because it makes him happy. Kant might defend himself by saying that it would be too easy for a person to succumb to selfish desires if he is gaining happiness from his virtuous acts, and any action is not moral if there are any external motivators, but I will show how this defense fails near the end of the paper. Kant and Aristotle have very different opinions on what makes a person virtuous and what defines a virtuous act. My thoughts on morality line up more with Aristotle’s.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics