Uncle Sam And The Big Bear Analysis

Improved Essays
Uncle Sam and the Big Bear

Once upon a time, two countries with all power of all times got into a war, but not a typical war with bombs and nuclear weapons although they have them. This war was not that common war of direct action; it was the strangest war of all times. Poodles and servants were only a piece of this big Lego masterpiece in which each country wanted to bring down the other’s structure. The leaders of each country were Big Bear and Uncle Sam, but although they created this war they didn’t want to destroy their territories so they were quite smart and began in different parts of the world.
All countries took a team, and the world got divided into a bipolar complement, each side had its own leader and this is how the war got real.
…show more content…
Capitalism and communism won the latest war but what would be the result of this war that definitely won’t end in a good way? The bear and Uncle Sam began to create and establish their objectives and the first one was to expand their ideology and create more power for them showing to the enemy their power and strength. They had to make whatever they can to accomplish their objectives, and as soon as the other knew something about what the other’s plan was, they had to called each other in that special Red Phone which was located in each house.
Leveraging the situation of the B city, which was the gift that the latest war let them, they had to divide it with a big wall. This wall represented “protection” of each community that lived in each side, and this didn’t happened in only the B city, it happened in all countries around the world.
The war began to get tenser each day, although Uncle Sam and the Bear had everything previously arranged with the B city they started to had problems with migration and most of this migration was from the bear side to the Uncle side which proclaims capitalism and very individual and free state. More problems began to appear and the Country got divided too; but Uncle Sam did won this

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    World War 1 Dbq Essay

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The most anticipated war in history, World War One, started off with the assassination of Franz Ferdinand. That event launched the July Crisis- a period of time where Europe was in a fighting frenzy. Countries were declaring war on each other, gathering secret alliances and building their armies. The Crisis was another event that lead to this Great War along with the Triple Alliance pact and Russo-Japanese War. Other underlying causes for the war were alliances, imperialism, militarism, and most destructive, nationalism.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The public’s opinion on the war drastically changed the politics that came after, and over time the war came to a…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Union victory at Antietam lost the Confederacy is foreign supporters and the chance of recognition by them. This would later affect the election that followed in the…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Donald’s thesis for his essay is that the South did not lose the war because of a lack of economic resources or poor leadership, but because the people wanted to keep their civil liberties during the war. Donald’s explanation of how the Southern soldiers were unwilling to have their civil liberties cut short by the government is a key reason why his reason is the strongest. If soldiers did not approve of actions of their officers, they would not do what they were told. This is the base of poor leadership.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is plentiful discourse as to why the Northern Union won the Civil War in 1865 against the Southern Confederacy. Although the military leadership from Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses S. Grant in the North and Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee in the South both impacted the outcome, Jefferson Davis’s poor political leadership both as president and commander in chief led to the Northern victory, particularly his defective judgements regarding military affairs and his moderate leadership as president that yielded tenuous relations with the Confederate people. According to David M. Potter, Jefferson Davis was not fit to command the Confederate Army. He was “his own secretary of war and his own general in chief” in which he included departmentalization…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Americans have been fascinated with the concept of war for centuries. War has evolved from a last resort into an opportunity for America to prove its superiority against other countries, and to instill fear within the nation. In short, war is a grandiose weapon. In the novel, The New American Militarism: How Americans Are Seduced by War, Andrew J. Bacevich discusses the relationship that has existed and continues to exist between America and war. Although Bacevich is able to pinpoint a plethora of explanations as to how militarism has evolved into what it is now, he does not present a clear thesis.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Union`s Navy obstructed the South`s waterway transport (Goldfield, P408).It directly caused economy of the South become more and more weak, and also caused food and other supplies shortages. Due to Union chose a better military strategy, not only fought the Confederacy on lands, but obstructed their waterway transport. It was a significant reason why the Union was able to win the war finally. In conclusion, more resources, better military strategies, an excellent leader are the main reason to help the North win the war and protect the unity.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Berlin Wall

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages

    After World War II, Germany was divided into four parts: the West was controlled by the US, Great Britain and France, and the East was under the control of the USSR. These four countries were allies during World War II and fought against the fascist countries of Japan, Germany and Italy. When the war ended and Germany was divided into four parts, the USSR and the US started the political, economical and military “race” known as the Cold War from 1945 to 1989. The division of Europe from the Baltic Sea in the north to the Balkan Peninsula in the South is famously called the Iron Curtain, and it exemplifies the political differences between France, Great Britain and the US had with the USSR before the Berlin Wall was raised; although the territory…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Chinese Exclusion Act

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States gained most of the western states. The cause of the war was James k.Polk really wanted the Mexican territory . Polk and Zachary Taylor blockaded the mexicans and then the Exploration of California came along. It also created states that exist today and how they earn their…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On 8 January 1918, The 28th President of the United States of America, Woodrow Wilson, delivered his powerful speech to a joint session of Congress, in which he declared the fourteen points idea. This was later known as Woodrow Wilson’s Fourteen Points. He aims to make proposals which could ensure peace in the future as well as to end all future wars. This short essay intents to explore the historical context, content, its influence on public, and the issues within the speech which affect the historians.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Berlin Wall Research Paper

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Take it down, the berlin Wall speech Hello I am Mary Green and that may not mean anything to you but I was there when the Berlin wall came down 4 months ago. The Berlin wall caused many people to be in pain and caused multiple conflicts between many people and even other countries.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The importance of concrete for mankind is so huge that hard to really appreciate so it is not surprising that people living today in concrete houses, driving on concrete roads don't have even an idea that they owe it to ancient Romans. Even that in case of arch they not discovered all by themselves We can be grateful for Romans that they not wasted legacies of earlier generations respected it and learned from them with Greek philosophy also secrets of architecture. I like to think about ancient Romans as these which made concrete foundation literally and not literally for European and later also, other parts of the world even if they weren't perfect. Romans didn't invent arch they found it through their conquest of Greece…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rwanda Case Study

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    a. To conquer and destroy the armed power of the enemy. b. To take possession of his material and other sources of strength. c. To gain public opinion. 11.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Contrasting World War I versus. World War II History is the past, and it’s important to reflect on the past, to help ensure that as a society we don’t repeat mistakes. At the time of both World War I and World War II, each became the largest war in history up until that point. Each war shared tremendous amounts of death, and the involvement of many countries, so it’s crucial to analyze the causes and the factors of each war to truly see the nature of the circumstances revolving both wars.…

    • 1610 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Rationalist Explanations for War,” James Fearon argues that due to war’s costly nature and states’ risk-averse, or at least risk-neutral, tendencies, there should always exist some possible prewar agreement between two disputing states that both parties would prefer to achieve over committing to war. While seeking to reveal his main claim that war is caused by information problems, commitment problems, and issue indivisibilities, Fearon critiques five traditional Neorealist explanations of war: anarchy, positive expected utility, preventive war, lack of information, and miscalculation of relative power. Although Fearon’s critique of the majority of these theories are earnest and do expose multiple logical shortcomings, his rapid dismissal…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays