Rwanda Case Study

Improved Essays
a. To conquer and destroy the armed power of the enemy.

b. To take possession of his material and other sources of strength.

c. To gain public opinion.

11. Offensive and defensive. Clausewitz said that basically the two conflict parties alike have a strong initiative to conduct offensive, so there is actually no defensive terms. But each didn't want to strike at the same time, so one party will probably wait until it has enough strength and therefore temporarily they took defensive strategy.

12. Center of Gravity. To achieve a decisive victory, military leaders must identify the Center of Gravity of the enemy, then concentrate all his strength at that point. He also believes that more power and strength of the troops will guarantee victory.

THE PRIMACY OF POLITICS

13. According to Clausewitz, war is not only political
…show more content…
Clausewitz also advocated that the military is the instrument of the country to conduct the politics. Therefore forbidden for military to determine policy of the political state, the military is also bans to take a part in practical political activities. In Indonesia, the military has to be "on track" with the publication of Indonesian National Defense Forces (INDF) Act No. 34 in 2004 article 17 paragraph 1 affirmed that "the authority and responsibility for the deployment of INDF's strength lies in the President of Indonesia".

THE ENDS AND MEANS OF THE WAR

15. The ends of war is to conquer the enemy and disarms them. Therefore the ends of the war should be devoted to political consideration appropriately, we find that the goal of any war is varied in accordance with the wishes of the political and environmental conditions.

16. Associated with the means Clausewitz said, to know how much resources should be mobilized in the war, we should see our political objectives and also enemy’s political purposes. Then we have to measure the strength of the enemy situation, including the character and ability of their government and their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, if we want to prevent war, leaders should know what is war and inquiry what causes it, why and how war conducted in order to bring solution for nation by eliminating it cause. Moreover, we obviously need theories and principles of war to enhance our judgment of the essence of war and evaluate their current application. Through comprehensive assessment of different theories, we reflect on great intellectuals and fundamental definition of war, on history of great wars, and find how theories work.…

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clausewitz: Purpose Of War

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages

    From this it follows that the disarming or overthrow of the enemy, whichever we call it, must always be the aim of warfare. Now war is always the shock of two hostile bodies in collision, not the action of a living power upon an inanimate mass, because an absolute state of endurance would not be making war; therefore what we have just said as to the aim of action in war applies to both parties. Here then is another case of reciprocal action. As long as the enemy is not defeated, I have to apprehend that he may defeat me, then I shall…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That being said, most Americans thought that pouring money into their protection made a lot of sense, but for different reasons than FDR. The President thought that increasing the strength of the military would help prepare them for war. The whole country was backed up on spending money for national security, and some even claimed that “[We] shall have no other business, no other aim in life, but primitive self-defense” (Document C). Besides the navy, the peace draft created through the Selective Service Act (1940) was also important to maintain national security. By preparing the soldiers to defend their country, FDR was also preparing them to go to war.…

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I begin my paper by Waltz’s perception of modern realist theory, who in his writing ‘Man, the state of war’, has pointed out three integral images of the causes of war. Firstly, dealing with the classical realist thought, war has its root in flawed human nature. In his view, the evilness of men, or their inappropriate behavior results in war. Second, the internal organization of the state unit is crucial in understanding its prosperity towards war. Which means in order for a state to prevent itself from self-destruction, a homogenous unified entity must be promoted and to foster this type of unified entity, the state seeks war against others.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Brett's War Theory

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Osama Bin Laden’s network could not hope to conquer the United States in a total war but could potentially reach some of its objectives in the indirect approach surprise attacks that it used. The United States’ response could be described as total war against Afghanistan and later Iraq, but I would argue that the US still used a limited war response in that only limited Reserves were mobilized, US industries were not nationalized, and both strategic and tactical targeting was limited initially to national and military targets and then later only to insurgents. More importantly the United States was not trying to conquer to occupy territory, but to reestablish a better peace. Subsequent terrorist attacks against the United Kingdom, France, and elsewhere, were all similar in employing indirect approaches to attacking our civilian open society weaknesses essentially trying to send a message to the West to get out of…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    military has been using SOF to train ally militant groups behind enemy lines and perform direct action missions to eliminate these insurgencies before they spread any further. SOF biggest role to fight these insurgencies is by making sure nations with less military expertise have the ability to battle insurgents if they become a problem within their country. As stated by Assistant Secretary of Defense Michael D. Lumpkin, “SOF capabilities for indirect activities enable us to persistently engage throughout the world, working with international partners to build their capabilities before conflicts arise so that they can defend themselves and, by extension, defend us.” This strategy keeps the U.S. from getting involved in another large scale war and allows allies to eventually defend themselves without the need of U.S. military assistance. This study will draw off historical examples of U.S. military conflicts from the Gulf War to SOF current involvement against insurgencies. In doing so, one can determine what specific factors led the U.S. to switch from deploying conventional forces to SOF.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cause Of War Analysis

    • 1050 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Causes of War “On the individual level of analysis, theories about war center on rationality. One theory, consistent with realism, holds that the use of war and other violent means of leverage in international conflicts is normal and reflects rational decisions of national leaders” (Goldstein & Pevenhouse). World War II wreaked havoc on the world due to the devastation caused by Adolf Hitler national leader of Germany whose intent was bent on destroying a race population whom he thought insignificant and inferior. Sparked by Adolf Hitler’s decision to invade Poland World war II began due to Hitler aggressive intent on ignoring the fact that Poland had the support of British and French military support. Hitler as an individual allowed his thoughts…

    • 1050 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To an offensive realist, cause for war would result from opposing states threatening their power and/or legitimacy. An example of offensive realist theory being applied to history is Adolf Hitler’s lead into WWII. Hitler sought to maximize his power by conquering surrounding and/or rivaling states that threatened Germany’s…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A country having this strong and deep feeling, pushed the leaders into world domination also with the strong force of Nationalism. The leaders may have though that if they were the best and had the greatest military, why not take over the rest of the world with our support and power? When other countries, who had a great military with strong navel support, saw another country building up their military and navel support, they felt threatened and wanted to prove that they were the best, so this had a big effect on the lead up to World War…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    During the time of Frederick, the state played a central role in building a strong military to exercise power and control. However, Clausewitz introduced the concept of the trinity which includes new elements in the character of warfare. Clausewitz suggested that warfare is characterized by violence/emotion, uncertainty and reason. This nature involves human and environmental issues such as reason, emotion, and technology in policy implementation on issues related to war. Following this idea, the 19th century approach introduced the human elements of war, suggesting that the state should be involved in a diplomatic and democratic process of seeking the people’s ideas and consent on war based on the prevailing economic, environmental, social and political…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays