Brooks views the youth’s morality as incompetent and disheartening. He finds that youth are terrible at thinking and talking about morality. That all youth judgements are based on emotivism (how they feel at the moment). Although Tumminio agrees many college-aged individuals do not have a traditional framework for tackling morality, she believes that young people invest themselves in moral issues through this untraditional manner. She states that they are far from impotent when it comes to discussing right and wrong. When discussing morality young people think in incredibly creative ways. Young people take into consideration that violent upbringings or peaceful ones, sound school systems or dysfunctional ones, friends, money and opportunity all influence individuals. Tumminio and Brooks views on the morality of college students are very different but common ground can be found.
…show more content…
He is going off the response of the 230 young adults that were in the study. His exposure to youth is only through their documented responses to the questions asked in the study. Which is fundamentally different from Tumminio’s exposure to the youth seeing as how her job requires her to be around and hold conversations with them. Tumminio is the most valid source seeing as how she is around young adults on a daily basis,compared to Brooks who doesn't spend extensive time around young adults like the ones in this
He is going off the response of the 230 young adults that were in the study. His exposure to youth is only through their documented responses to the questions asked in the study. Which is fundamentally different from Tumminio’s exposure to the youth seeing as how her job requires her to be around and hold conversations with them. Tumminio is the most valid source seeing as how she is around young adults on a daily basis,compared to Brooks who doesn't spend extensive time around young adults like the ones in this