First, this literature cannot be considered practical for different settings. It has been overrepresented for therapy group settings and underrepresented for training group and laboratory group settings. The second source of criticism comes from methodological problems since the conclusions carried out in different settings are based on the observations of single groups and Tuckman obtains more qualitative data than qualitative data. Additionally, the systematic manipulation of independent variables in each setting cannot be controlled, since they are likely to vary from different group composition and duration. However, Tuckman's teamwork theory provide a useful and simple way to consider about how individuals interact in team situations. It can be recognized that whether group development is normal according to his model. Then figuring out the needs to manage different aspects of team
First, this literature cannot be considered practical for different settings. It has been overrepresented for therapy group settings and underrepresented for training group and laboratory group settings. The second source of criticism comes from methodological problems since the conclusions carried out in different settings are based on the observations of single groups and Tuckman obtains more qualitative data than qualitative data. Additionally, the systematic manipulation of independent variables in each setting cannot be controlled, since they are likely to vary from different group composition and duration. However, Tuckman's teamwork theory provide a useful and simple way to consider about how individuals interact in team situations. It can be recognized that whether group development is normal according to his model. Then figuring out the needs to manage different aspects of team