Tocqueville Analysis

Improved Essays
Tocqueville created a rather lovely image of what townships were like back in the 1800s. He gives us a deep look into what townships were like back then and even tells us of its origins. He paints a rather rosy picture of involvement and the livelihood of how townships operated. By looking at how Tocqueville saw townships in his day and age, we can use it to compare how townships look in today’s day and age.
Tocqueville counts Plymouth, New York as the where the origins of the township system were created. When people got here they knew they needed some type of government and they decided to pick their leaders as a whole. They also voted on laws to be enacted. Most of the laws were religious laws or laws that would separate out land. Most of the religious laws were taken right out of the bible and used them to help them set up their basic government. They also figured that religion would
…show more content…
As discussed above the federal government was really accountable to the grassroots of the country, it was the townships that made the real difference. Tocqueville was worried that this would create more than just disagreements in Congress. In de-centralizing the government you were losing security in the process of gaining public engagement. Tocqueville does not think that in the long run it will work. Again, as I said before, America at the time was very homogenous and had, if not the same than close to, the same culture. “For my part, I cannot conceive that a nation can live or above all prosper without strong governmental centralization” (CH. 5 – pg. 98) He did see that citizens could be more effective in other places that the federal government could ever be, for instance welfare. “Citizens will always have more power to produce social welfare than the authority of the government.”(CH. 5 – pg. 85) He still thought though that it was dangerous to not have the power more

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Farm City Chapter Summary

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Farm City Reading Journal 1 In the introduction of Farm City, Novella Carpenter writes, “I have a farm on a dead-end street in the ghetto.” This sole sentence, while unusual at first, summarizes what Novella endured during her life in Oakland, California. Her farm initially started as a means to make a living, a way to produce food but then it became something more.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The town first appears in García Márquez's short story "Leaf Storm". It is the central location for the subsequent novel One Hundred Years of Solitude. He has since used Macondo as a setting for several other stories. In Evil Hour, published the year before One Hundred Years of Solitude, García Márquez mentions Macondo as the town where Father Ángel was succeeded by the one-hundred-year-old Antonio Isabel del Santísimo Sacramento del Altar Castañeda y Montero, a clear reference to the novel to come.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 6 - Toussaint and Tecumesh: Resisting the odds In the nineteenth century, Western countries tried to dominate the rest of the world. By their superior technology and weapon, they succeeded in most conquest with a series of colonies and territories. However, some superior leaders among the non-white peoples are able to delay or even defeat the western conquerors.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around the American Revolution, it was controversial how it should be run .Of these one of these debates was about which government the United States should adopt. Two types of people were involved in this controversy; there were Anti-Federalists and Federalists. The Federalists would rather have a stronger central government while the Anti-Federalists preferred more power to go to the individual states. In order to reach a compromise of this national debate, Roger Sherman, an extremely influential and out-spoken figure in the country’s freedom, held a dinner party.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison and Alexis de Tocqueville are both giants in American political theory and both have deliberated extensively on the tyranny of the majority in democratic societies. Since both are from different eras, the way each of them talk about the problem is framed in different terms and different contexts. Madison offers a solution to a perceived problem, and Tocqueville observes and critiques the solution. In the many Federalist Papers Madison published on the issue, there is one solution that is most conductive to reducing the powers of the tyranny of the majority, and this is solution is the checks and balances between the separate branches of government and between the federal and state governments. Tocqueville’s assessment of this attempted restraint is poor, he sees the government as becoming increasingly centralized in power and state and local governments losing their prestige and influence.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Publius: Case Study

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Publius provides a convincing case for ratification by thoroughly addressing the Antifederalists’ two primary concerns including a potential consolidation of government, and the dangers of hastily ratifying the Constitution. The Federal Farmer summarizes his concerns here: “The plan proposed appears to be partly federal, but principally however, calculated ultimately to make the states one consolidated government. The first interesting question, … is, how far the states can be consolidated into one entire government on free principles.” Governmental consolidation threatens the people’s liberty and this could manifest in a blurred line between branches of government. Furthermore, the Federal Farmer believes, “Aristocrats support and hasten…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within the Federalist Papers Publius claims that for the United States to work it needs an extended republic given by the Constitution and that any other form of government will not work. Those who oppose the new Constitution, the Anti-Federalists, claim that the new constitution will erode liberty and destroy the government. The Anti-Federalists present several arguments against the Constitution, but Publius quickly and easily shoots them down to show the necessity of an extended republic and how other options for fixing the government simply will not do. One argument against the Constitution, given by the Federalist Farmer argues that, “wealth, office, and the benefits of government would collect in the centre: and the extreme states and their principal towns would become much less important” (CP 44). Agrippa makes a similar argument…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Neither Tocqueville nor the authors of the Federalist Papers view an enlightened and virtuous citizenry as wholly essential to the Constitutional system, but while the federalists build institutions to defend the government against the self-interested passions of the people, Tocqueville sees the greatest benefits of the American political system where the government and the people meet: in the township and in political associations. The Federalists believe that the core of the Constitution system’s success lies in its institutions rather than the people. Their writings repeatedly show doubt in the abilities of the public to govern, construct institutions to defend against their involvement, limiting their civic duties to elections. Tocqueville,…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Differences Between Federalists and Anti-Federalists In tumultuous 1787 fifty-five men got together in order to create the United States Constitution. This was a time when the most important debate in America’s history took place. Federalists were for the adoption of the Constitution while Anti-Federalists were against of it. The Federalists differ from the Anti-Federalists in terms of social, political and economic spheres.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The tone of Tocqueville’s letter is serious, honest, and sarcastic. Towards the end of the letter, his tone was serious when he was describing the native Indians that were being removed from their land. He was describing a women that was of a hundred and ten years of age; he explains how she was naked except for a blanket that was covering her. When Tocqueville was talking about the women he said, “I have never seen a more frightening figure.” Here he was being both serious and honest.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They would strive for happiness for themselves, and for the democracy as a whole. Tocqueville thought for a successful democracy, citizens must keep the greater good in line with their own interest. They would keep in mind of their actions, if they would be beneficial to themselves as an individual, and to society as a whole. Mill and Tocqueville both agreed with the notion of individualism, and allowing individuals to think, and to form opinions, and to carry out their opinions without hindrance from anyone.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kevin L. Doolie writes about Alexis De Tocqueville and his political theories and says that De Tocqueville was right in thinking that early American colonies heavily influenced the rest of America. The religious thought and belief for a ruling authority connected them to realize that they needed a government to have…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Summary Of Tocqueville

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages

    3 Tocqueville The Danger of a Non-Violent Oppressor According to Tocqueville there is so little freedom of thought and debate in America, because the majority controls the minds and actions of the entire population. Unlike in an absolute monarchy, the American majority ideals penetrate the morals of each individual causing them to not want to behave outside of the norm. Americans refrain from expressing different ideas because they fear ostracism - in this system, even when people agree with the minority, they avoid associating themselves with it for fear of exclusion from society - thus the minority does not grow.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After Shay’s Rebellion proved that the Articles of Confederation were ineffective and unable to manage the states and it’s people. It was evident that a new form of government needed to be crafted. But what kind of government and how should it operate? These were the types of questions that the Federalists and the Anti-Federalist grappled with and argued over, for many years. The Anti-Federalists and the Federalists both took inspiration from men like John Locke and Thomas Hobbes.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays