The Rachel’s explain Utilitarianism as requiring in each circumstance to choose the outcome …show more content…
I really like that since utilitarianism strives to promote the well-being of the most people possible; it forces us to look at all of the people that are affected. This is crucial for a legal system, because if only the needs of a few are being met, then we can hardly claim that justice is being carried out. For our system to function effectively there must be consideration for the entire population during decision making.
I do not wish for my society to literally seek to instill happiness in its citizens, like some kind of quasi-Brave New World. I think people have the right to be sad or angry in the same sense that they have a right to be delighted or euphoric. To me the key element is having that guarantee of free will and protection from oppression. Human rights, or the right to protection from abuse, are some of the most important factors in making a morally just society. It is such a simple idea but it has very positive outcomes. If you do not abuse people and do not take advantage of them the society will run …show more content…
People know when they are taking advantage of others and my ruler certainly, with a staff of police will be able to point out when someone is being taken advantage of. The system I will be putting into place will be that of a moral council. There will be a normal police force that has a standard set of rules, such as preventing theft and murder. Then there is the moral council. The council will consist of twenty randomly selected citizens that do not know each other. They will serve for ten days at a time. During those ten days they are the utmost high power, below the despot, and they make all of the moral decisions that are not clear black and white. This system is much like the United States jury system but gives the council more