Thomson's Essay, A Defense Of Abortion

Great Essays
Question 1: In Thomson’s piece of writing, “A Defense of Abortion” she argues that fetuses have a right to live unless the mother decides to have an abortion because she has been raped. Thomson says she grants that the fetus has a right to live at the moment of conception, but goes on to say that ‘it’s not self-evident that a fetus’s right to life will always outweigh the mother’s right to determine what goes on in her body. Therefore, Thomson concludes that abortion is permissible even if the woman knows the possible consequences of having sex. In Thomson’s essay, she follows this up with the illustration of the violinist. In this scenario, a person has been kidnapped, taken to a hospital and hooked up to a famous violinist. After waking …show more content…
With that being the case Thomson concludes that in this scenario of a woman being raped that abortion is okay. Furthermore, Thomson expresses that the mother has a right to self-defense, meaning that she has the right to see the fetus as a “trespasser,” so in this instance, she has the right to have an abortion if she is not wanting to have the child. This is where my view changed. A person has been put into a position that they have not asked to specifically be in and they now have to deal with the result and consequences that come from having sex and being pregnant with a child. In my opinion, no one should have to even go through this, but with the reality being that it happens to so many people they should be able to have the option to “opt out” of having the baby if that is truly what they want. Unfortunately, many of the of woman that this happens to are very young and even still in school. Having a baby can really hinder them from finishing their education and getting a job. Since this happens unexpectedly to so many people cannot afford to even support the baby and give it a life that it truly deserves, getting the necessities can even be a problem for many

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Ingalls 1 Cody Ingalls Professor Rhodes Introduction to Ethics April 15th, 2017 Case Study The debate surrounding abortion rights presents many ethical dilemmas, and is rarely a black and white issue, which makes it difficult to label all abortions as moral or immoral. Many people who are opposed to abortion are willing to support it in certain situations, such as in the case of rape, incest, or the endangerment of a mother’s life. One of these situations is described in the case study “Conceived in Violence, Born in Hate,” an overview of a rape and assault victim who was forcibly impregnated and decided to carry the child to term. The case raises interesting questions about the morality of abortions in the case of rape, and the autonomy of…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abortion is filling headlines of newspapers on a daily basis in America, creating such a strong tension that people murdering others because of differing opinions. This conflict over abortion has been controversial for hundreds of years, as most religions are against birth control and abortions. Additionally, many people see abortions as being morally and ethically wrong, but others may see it as a right to any women, or as a necessity to help control population and prevent economic turmoil. Furthermore, the concern over such controversy is even stated as an issue in some literature works such as “A Modest Proposal” by Johnathan Swift. In Swift’s work, the issue of abortion is founded in the fact that the poor Catholics could often not afford to take care of another child and thus try to get rid of it before it was born.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is often a large dispute over abortion and when personhood begins. Some believe it is at fertilization, some think that it is a vague concept, and some believe that it is when the child is born. The common argument against abortion is the claim that the fetus is a person and therefore has a right to life. A philosopher, Judith Jarvis Thomson, believes that even if personhood begins at the stage of being a fetus, there are still times when it is moral to abort the fetus. She believes that personhood begins at a vague time, however she wants to prove even if the fetus is a person, she can provide times when it is still morally permissible to have an abortion.…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomson discusses abortion in three main instances: rape, threat to mother’s life, and consensual sex. For each of these categories, she goes into detail explaining why abortion should still be permissible. Furthermore, she starts with the situation that most people would be most likely to agree with her on―that abortion should be permissible in the case of rape. She then goes on to discuss the next instance, a threat to the mother’s life, that people would be less likely to agree with her, but still more likely than the last situation with consensual sex.…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These cases are supposed to be analogous to cases of rape, threat to life, or when a woman has taken reasonable precautions not to get pregnant. Thomson does not, however she concludes that abortion is justified in any and every case. There is a moral requirement to be a Minimally Decent Samaritan as Thomson puts it, and this makes a late abortion wrong if it is done just for the sake of convenience. To use her example, it would be wrong for a woman in her seventh month of pregnancy to get an abortion just to avoid the nuisance of postponing a trip…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The premise of the anti-abortionist’s argument would change to 3. Therefore, the fetus has a right to not be killed unjustly. Then Thomson goes on to say that the emendation helps clear the gap in the argument against abortion. By the gap, Thomson means the question of whether the fetus has a right to life and from there whether an abortion is the unjust killing of the fetus, especially in the case of where the mother is raped. To close the gap would be for the anti-abortionists to provide enough evidence to prove that the fetus has a right to…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If all women who did not want to have offspring put their child up for adoption, this difference would be even bigger. This causes more children to go without families, which could have detrimental effects on a child’s life. These include health risks, homelessness or bad housing, and involvement in the criminal justice system (“The AFCARS Report” 6). It is not morally right to force a person to live under such circumstances. If the woman is forced to go through with the pregnancy, it could cause the child to have a worse life.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy is the application of ethical approaches to issues, controversies, theories, and ideas. It is in one’s nature to seek answers to questions which are asked. It is also in one’s nature to question and decide if an idea or ideal is right or wrong, but in the case of ethics; permissible or impermissible. In this text, we are going to use these terms as acceptable or permitted and vice-versa. In this essay, we will be analyzing the article, “A Defense of Abortion” by philosopher, Judith Jarvis Thompson.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thomson and Hursthouse both have come to the conclusion that abortion is impermissible but there are acceptable situations in which abortion should be permitted. In my opinion I agree with both Thomson and Hursthouse but in the end the conclusion of Hursthouse is the view I could see making both sides of abortion acceptable. When a woman and man conceive a baby knowingly, getting an abortion will only occur in the event of a health risk or the chances of the baby living after birth will be so minimum. By choosing abortion before letting the child get to full term is less painful than carrying the baby to full term and giving themselves false hope. It is understandable that some may want to fight for that chance but there is the option of abortion.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, an abortion in the seventh month of the pregnancy without any complications, is more indecent then an abortion in the third month with complications. Thompson concludes by stating that although mothers have the right to abort their fetuses that does dot grant them the right to kill them if the fetus survives the abortion and that abortion is not strictly either morally permissible or morally impermissible but depends on the…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    My thesis is that Thomson argues that abortion is permissible is some cases, however, her examples provided, do not always properly support her argument. Thomson makes a variety of arguments during Defense of Abortion that mostly combat the view that all abortion is morally impermissible. She believes that in most cases people decisions of whether abortion is morally permissible versus impermissible is dependent on whether a person believes that an embryo is a person. This suggests that since the embryo is a person then…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, she uses examples to try to explain why abortion is not an immoral act as she treats the fetus as an invader to the woman’s body. Some people however do not agree with Thomson’s depiction of how she defended why abortion should be allowed. With this in mind, I will try to argue that abortion is not an immoral act since women have the right to do whatever they so choose to do with their body, especially in the case that the fetus is as Thomson…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mary Anne Warren presents her argument for abortion, first, by replying to Thomson’s argument with falsehoods she gathered from his premises. The largest opposition Warren had with Thompson, was based upon the statement he made that allowed for abortion to be permissible even if the fetus has a full right to life. Warren argues that there cannot be an argument for abortion if it is believed that a fetus has a full right to life, because an abortion would immediately dismiss this. In Warren’s argument, she focuses heavily on defining personhood and the moral status that coincides with it, and the lack of both in a fetus. I am going to argue on behalf of Warren, however adding the argument that a fetus does not have full moral status, while an infant does, in hopes to respond to the issue of infanticide.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    She isn’t claiming that abortions are always permissible or that it is permissible to secure the death of an unborn child. I do not believe in abortion for reasons I will not address at this time and therefore am not claiming to feel the same Thomson does about all of her arguments, but I do agree that the “right to life” argument is not a solid one. With the analogies Thomson set out, it is clear that cases must be looked at individually because the details make all the difference. I feel she succeeds in her goal. She challenges the way I feel about abortion and requires that I justify my reasons for or against it for more than just the fetus’s “right to…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    She suggests that because a pregnancy is such a great sacrifice, that, while women should carry a child to term after becoming pregnant, we cannot require them to do so. This argument also requires that the fetus’ right to life is subject to the mother’s whim and does not carry as much weight as the first two arguments. Thomson concludes the article by saying that she is not attempting to delineate the circumstances in which a pregnancy might be morally permissible and those in which it isn’t, but rather to make it clear that even if we consider a fetus to be a person, that abortion can still be morally permissible. This weakens her argument a great deal, instead of providing a proscriptive criterion to base the morality of abortion on, she simply provides what may be a series of fringe cases to establish that while abortion is normally wrong, it isn’t always so. Thomson’s argument on abortion is fundamentally deontological.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays