Interpretation Of God In Thomas Hobbes Leviathan

Great Essays
Thomas Hobbes has been recognized as an influential thinker who , broke the tides of traditional divine political theology, and put in place the foundations for a more secular form of political philosophy. At the time were religious pretexts were paramount to the progression of society, Hobbes’s Leviathan portrayed men as creatures whose main concern was the pursuit of self preservation . Though almost half of Leviathan is dedicated to the theological explanation of God, some may argue Gods irrelevance for most of the naturalistic arguments that are put fourth. This essay will expand on Hobbes 's interpretation of a mortal type of higher power based on reason rather than a conception of a theological being. I will argue, that Hobbes’s form …show more content…
Since religion causes controversies in society, the state should be founded specifically on civil authority. For example, he believed thinking of religion gives anxiety, because men would always have to be in fear in ignorance of their wrong doings, and sins. Hobbes states “This perpetual feare, alwayes accompanying mankind in the ignorance of causes, as it were in the dark, must needs have for object something.” He then adds “In which sense, perhaps it was that some of the old Poets said that the Gods were first created by humane Feare.” He further argues that Jesus did not intend to rule the world, and did not urge Christians to do the same. According to Hobbes Christians are to just waiting for the return of Jesus where we will then establish his direct rule of the world.For this reason, he concludes Christianity does not have a right to rule, or have any obligation to attain …show more content…
He claims that,“the Kingdom of God was first instituted by the Ministry of Moses over the Jews only; and cased afterward in the election of Saul”. This argument collides with the New Testament, and the Catholic doctrine all combine. The word “Kingdom of God” also may have many different uses in the bible, like earthly kingdom, to state of mind, to Jesus, or even to a Christian Community. Verses of the bible say the” Kingdom of God is an era that has already arrived. “If I fast out devils by the finger of God, then the kingdom of God has come upon you’’[Luke 11:20]. Moreover Hobbes view that the Kingdom of God is only when God returns is invalid, and cannot apply to Christianity, Judaism, or Islam because these religions believe in a continuing presence of god(by believing in his will), and do abolish away God’s sovereign right over his right to rule society for the betterment of humanity. He is the supreme

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, strongly supporting a sovereign government to control political and social order, debates the evils of man’s free…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Hobbes view, if the sovereign can easily be overthrown, then you don’t really have a sovereign. They are, in a sense, immune (something close to a dictator). For Hobbes, where there is no rule there is no justice. Without a legal system in place, there is no conception of justice. The only way to make sure our selfishness doesn’t get out of control is an absolute…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1625-88 Transformation

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Previous to 1625, the overall idea of divine right – God given authority- was widely accepted and rarely challenged, as that was viewed as questioning God, this was used as reasoning to rule with absolute power and no parliament, however the divine right monarch -Charles I- was executed in 1649 and this led to a change in thoughts on divine right as society began to challenge those in higher authority. These ideas were further enhanced by political philosopher John Locke, Locke did not believe in absolutism and instead held a very liberal view, at the time, that it was not a necessity to have a one sole leader with all the power but instead that all men were born free and that no one had divine right as everybody was born equal in the eyes of God. He also believed that the confessional state should not have been resurrected and that the role of the government was to protect the basic rights of life and property and if the government passed this boundary then it could be destroyed. On the hand of this political perspective was political philosopher Thomas Hobbes, though Hobbes was not a complete absolutist, he believed that people should have individual freedoms, but they should only have these if a strong leader is in charge. In Hobbes’ book Leviathan he explains that because people are naturally…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes believed that people needed to be governed because without government the nation would be…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    How does Hobbes’s view of nature shape his political theory? Political theories make suppositions about nature and/or natural laws. These boundaries (including the behaviors of the people within it) shape actions and decision-making, and the rules of nature thusly form the foundation of the ideology. It is prudent to analyze in-depth this basis for the moral and political philosophy of the great thinkers. The assumptions must make sense if the overall theory of thought built upon this foundation is to hold up.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes states that “in order to live a more contented life… men must give up their freedom to the State” (Document 2). He believed that people were naturally cruel and needed protection from themselves. Hobbes wanted rule by absolute monarchs. He thought it was the only way to keep people in check. His beliefs closely supported how many people thought back then.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people believe that complete freedom will bring chaos to individuals because humans need some sort of leadership, and some believe that freedom brings only opportunities to show how great some people truly are. These two contrasting views on freedom are explained through the philosophical texts and views of Martin Luther King Jr and Thomas Hobbes. Martin Luther King Jr enlightened the entire world with his views in Love, Law and Civil Disobedience and Thomas Hobbes showed the world a new side of political philosophy with his work in Leviathan. In both of these works one can see the contrasting views on freedom and can judge what influenced these views based on the time period that these philosophers lived.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes believe that society should give up their freedoms to a dictator who would be responsible for everyone’s security, Hobbes would support the source since it advocates for the use of a totalitarian leader. Hobbes’s idea that if everyone were free then everyone would be in danger would be justified by a totalitarian ruler who wants to restrict…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another point that Hobbes makes is that he didn’t want the church getting involved with the government. The reason for this was that…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes for instance, believing that the state of nature is enviably a state of war explains that society needs a strong government to maintain order, ensuring that people do not lapse into war. This is why he argues for an absolute monarch. Hobbes view is that everyone is born with rights that they relinquish to the monarch in return for safety and protection. This is called the social contract. When people do this, they are essentially giving up their freedom and liberty, surrendering all control to the monarch.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the early modern periods when Hobbes lived, claims according to which political power originated from a divine or predetermined condition were accompanied by limitations on political rights of people. Hobbes was original, in that he used his argument in support of such ruling families by urging people that some liberty has to be given up and hence vouching for absolute…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction ‘During and after the English Revolution (1642-88), different English thinkers reacted differently toward the revolution, based on their own life experience and philosophical outlook’. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke strongly argued distinct notions of political power. One absolute kinship, the other a democratic republic. In this essay it will firstly state and discuss the relation between state and sovereign according to Thomas Hobbes. In doing so Thomas Hobbes ideas will then be compared to John Locke’s.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    PS4217F Major Political Thinkers: Hobbes Assignment 1: What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Hobbes’ theory of civil order? Name: Denise Cher Yan Wen Matriculation Number: A0127001A Word Count: 1887 Introduction Hobbes’ theory of civil order is based on the fundamental law of nature, which is to seek peace (Hobbes 2012, 200). According to Hobbes, to seek peace is necessarily to seek peace in the condition of war, and justice is therefore a legal compliance with the terms of the social contract (Hobbes 2012, 220).…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Hobbes’s motivation behind the book, Leviathan, is derived from the perception of a man and his intellect Hobbes purpose is to comprehend the condition of a man, which leads to the understanding of mankind, because the state of a man is nothing but artificial. To elaborate this notion, what dominates a man is his soul therefore the guidance is brought by a man’s joint and the consequences of an action are related to the nerves of a man. Hobbes claims the best way to understand mankind is to turn their thinking inwards and study oneself, which leads to understanding our thoughts, desires, and reflecting on the origin of these beliefs. According to Leviathan, the logical way to comprehend the thoughts of a man is through its senses; the…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, on the other hand, thinks that people only care about power and appetite. We want certain things and we want to get power to get those things. Hobbes’ view is that there is no such thing as responsibility. Moreover, we look at the state of nature. Locke stated that the state of nature is the state of no government; law that obliges everyone and reason.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays