The ‘Undue Weight’ of Truth on Wikipedia by Timothy Messer-Kruse is a great article about Kruse’s experience with the information, authors, and policies on Wikipedia. During the reading Kruse made valid points about Wikipedia’s policies and the requirements that need to be met in order to change an article on the website; these points left me with many questions. For example, why do secondary sources have more weight than certain primary sources? One would think that testimony from the publishing by the Library of Congress would have more weight than a book published about the case. Aside from the questions left unanswered, this was a very interesting and amusing article that catches the reader’s attention and promotes more in-depth
