Two Ways Of Knowing Essay

Improved Essays
Explore the strengths and weaknesses of two Ways of Knowing.

Ways of Knowing are methods in which we acquire and retain knowledge, each of which are used to different degrees in different situations. We use reason and emotion, in tandem everyday, and debatably, all the time. They are a crucial of the way we think and behave but both have their limitations.

Reason is defined as “the power of comprehending, inferring, or thinking especially in orderly rational ways” (Definition of Reason, n.d.) and is often thought of as equivalent to logic. Logic is a strain of reasoning which can be categorised two different ways: inductive and deductive reasoning. Inductive reason is looking for a pattern in information, and generalising based on that. Contrastingly, deductive reason takes a broad generalisation and comes to specific conclusions from that. An example of deductive reasoning are syllogisms, which are consisted of two premises and a conclusion. An example would be:

All boys like football.
Sam is a boy.
Sam likes football.

The above demonstrates how deductive reasoning can help us come to valid conclusions. However, it also demonstrates how a valid statement is not necessarily a true one and people often don’t differentiate the two meanings, which leads to false knowledge. There are
…show more content…
Another example of a common logical fallacy would be Appeal To Ignorance which is often used to prove that certain religions are true because they can’t be proved to be false. Both of the aforementioned fallacies are proof that reasoning can fail us on a day to day basis, even when we think we are being perfectly logical and that reason is the best method of finding the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Succinctness Theory

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Successful persuasion, as SJT demonstrates, requires monitoring of ego-involvement levels and careful control of the discrepancy issue between message senders and receivers. By understanding SJT and modifying message positions based on the size of the discrepancy gap, persuasive communicators can be successful in their goals when approaching both highly ego-involved and lowly ego-involved audiences. Returning to the evaluation of SJT, a final consideration is the SJT’s level of consistency, which refers to the theory’s logical basis and the necessity for the theory to neither contradict itself (i.e. internal consistency) nor other theories believed to be just as accurate and accepted (i.e. external consistency).…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Clifford’s “The Ethics of Belief,” Clifford argues the immorality of believing without sufficient evidence. In most situations, Clifford’s point of view would be practical; if we wish to be true seekers of the truth, it would be unethical to ever believe in something without sufficient evidence. This is a valid statement, but there are exceptions to this idea which are dependent on the situation. When it comes to the type of evidence presented, a belief can be justified or found to be wrong. Clifford sets two questions we are to ask ourselves when it comes to believing things that aren’t proven with physical evidence, rather shown by testimony.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Evidence is crucial to moral skepticism because it determines how we justify our thoughts so whenever possible one should always strive to understand all aspects of a situation. By comprehending the totality of an event, the best moral decision can be determined. The extreme contrast class includes every moral claim contrary to the chosen action, including all extreme forms of thoughts. (Sinnot-Armstrong Section 4) One such extreme is the idea of moral nihilism or the idea that nothing is morally wrong. If noting is morally wrong then no moral truths exist.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alternatively, if our explanations come to an end, then they end either with a belief that is not justified, or with a belief that is justified, but not inferentially. A statement is certain or justified if it is proved, but proof is impossible because it is question-begging – any criterion for the validity of a proof requires a different proof, since self-justification is too easy and always possible. A justification procedure…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are common fallacies in philosophy arguments, which are invalid but do not interfere with the rules of reasoning with one set of standards to another. Some types of common fallacies are begging the question, which is rephrasing the conclusion. Distraction is a wordy argument leading away from the point topic at hand. Another type of fallacy is unclear or shifting conclusions there is no clear point as to what the argument is based on. The importance of a valid argument form is to have structure of the ideas.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    She later offers a critique of her definition being too weak because it does not guarantee the repetition of the virtuous act by a non-virtuous agent. It could also be too weak because it lacks sufficient requirements for the motivational aspect of the agent. There are situations where the definition could be too strong, given the agents motivation could be based on something other than the virtue. Zagzebski’s response is that the motivation does not affect the truth. These differences are based upon the…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rationalism and Empiricism are both separate theories of epistemology which is the attempt to understand the theory of knowledge. Though, the contrast between rationalism and empiricism are extreme. They both differentiate from each other and the key concepts of each other are largely contrasted. Empiricism, is the theory in which one learns through experience which is also known as ‘a posterior.’ Meanwhile, rationalism is when one uses logic and reason to come to a conclusion before the experience has taken place, this is known as ‘a priori.’ The key principles of rationalism are innate ideas, deduction and reason. Whereas empiricism, the principles are there are no innate ideas, induction trumps deduction and sense perception is the last…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Deductive logic attempts to create valid reasoning that will make it “impossible for the inferences based upon these reasons to be false” (Popkin and Stroll, 239).This means that if reasons are given and if these reasons are valid and are deemed to be true then the inferences made are conclusive. To better understand this, one may further dissect the two forms of an argument. Deductive reasoning is one of the most basic forms of valid reasoning. A deductive syllogism typically begins with a general statement that is the hypothesis. This hypothesis is used to examine the possibilities to reach a specific, logical conclusion.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Logic And Reasoning Essay

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Deductive reasoning proclaims that if reasons given are accurate, then it is infeasible for the claim to be false. However, ultimately Inductive and Deductive reasoning both share the same duty by weighing reasoning. Although there are some things that ultimately have truth like equating 2+2=0. A belief can not be true or false but its reasoning provides soundness for an argument. One example would be the controversy regarding abortion.Truth is fact or belief that conforms with reality.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The qualitative research study seeks to describe, analyze and translate patterns or qualities which, cannot be explained through numerical figures. The qualitative tasks include categorizing groups, assessing designs, criteria, information, types, problem analysis, location, purpose, researcher involvement and many other attributes of quality. However, while qualitative studies do generate deeper knowledge of a particular case it is considered to be somewhat weaker than its counterpart, the quantitative study. This is due to its lack of calculated results that boosts greater empirical attribution toward factual conclusions. Qualitative informs where, why, and how things are performed in light of actions or responses.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays