Manifest Destiny was a term that described the expansion of the United States. The name “manifest destiny” was brought up by an editor from the Democratic Review, John L. O’Sullivan. He wrote, “Our manifest destiny is to overspread the continent allotted by Providence…” Manifest destiny also had the chance to spread Anglo-American culture and the idea of racial superiority. The “inferior” peoples living the far west of the United States—Native Americans and Mexicans— had to be subjected to the American ideals and to be taught republicanism and Protestantism. The significance of manifest destiny was all in part of expanding new territories and American culture throughout the United States.
“Fifty-four forty or fight!”
During …show more content…
Sanford court case began with Dred Scott, a former slave who was living with his owner in a free state; although, he then went back to the state of MO, which was a slave state at the time. Dred Scott had argued that the time he had spent in those states named him the right of being a free man (aka emancipation). Disagreeing, the court 's final decision made by proslavery chief justice, Roger B. Taney announced that no blacks, slave or free, had the right to claim US citizenship and were prohibited to petition the court for their individual freedom. The importance of the Dred Scott vs. Sanford court case decision set more boundaries and conflicts between the North and South, which would later result in the American civil …show more content…
According to Stowe, her only reason for writing the story was “to awaken sympathy and feeling for the African race.” The novel had sanctioned colonization rather than abolition which alarmed many northern radicals. In the south, the novel was seen as propaganda; whereas in the north, it was interpreted as a moral romance. Harriet Beecher Stowe was very important because her book, Uncle Tom’s Cabin displayed the cruelty and inhumane practices done to chattel slaves in the upper and lower south to the public