The Sec's Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Program

Decent Essays
The SEC’s Dodd-Frank whistleblower program is getting a lot of attention now that the agency is announcing substantial rewards given for information. The SEC does not disclose the name of the company involved, nor the name of the whistleblower who received the reward, however, people still worry about maintaining their anonymity. While the whistleblower program has strong protections against retaliation, such as an employer firing an employee who gave the SEC a tip, there's no protection against gossip and social alienation.

Once an individual reports original information about a probable securities law violation, it may take months, or even years, before there is an SEC enforcement action. If no action is taken, or the sanctions against

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    1. Why did Congress enact the Sarbanes-Oxley Act? What are the major provisions and benefits of the Act? Congress enacted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in order to protect investors. This was done by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures made by in accordance with the securities laws.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For my person to be researching, I am covering Bernard Ebbers. Ebbers committed fraud, and he tried to merge his company with Sprint. This action was brought to the attention of the Department of Justice. Who immediately dashed this possibility. Ebbers company had an investigation with the SEC.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2002, Congress signed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) in response to several notorious corporate scandals, including those at Enron/Worldcom. The piece of legislation was aimed to hold corporate officers personally liable and to rebuild public confidence in the corporate sector. SOX, “requires violations of securities laws or breaches of fiduciary responsibility to be reported to either the chief legal officer or CEO of the company by-house attorneys or outside counsel (Reed, & Bogardus, 2015).” While most provisions of SOX are only applicable to public businesses, at least two criminal provisions apply to nonprofit businesses: whistleblower protection and forbidding the destruction, alteration, or concealment of documents or the impediment of investigations. Section 806 created a new federal anti-retaliation protection for corporate whistleblowers.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Minimizing corporate liability exposure when the whistle blows in the post Sarbanes-Oxley era. J. Corp. L., 30,…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was put into place in 2002 by Congress after being developed by Senator Paul Sarbanes and Representative Michael Oxley. The purpose of SOX is to “protect shareholders and other stakeholders of publicly traded companies” (Vanderbeck, 2013, p. 11). SOX became about because although The United States already had the Securities Act of 1933 it only held the corporations responsible, therefore, the CEO’s did not have to legally tell the truth making it hard hold them responsible for their actions. There are many important parts to the act. In this paper, I will discuss some of the importances of the act, the impact it has had on The United States, and the pros and cons.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Whistleblowing has been a topic of discussion in business for over a hundred years. While there are federally mandated regulations in place to protect whistleblowers, some still argue that whistleblowing is wrong. The main argument of these naysayers, like Norman Bowie and Sissela Bok, is that whistleblowing is an act of disloyalty to the company. In Ronald Duska’s article Whistleblowing II, he takes opposition to this stance. Throughout his article he makes three main points: employees have no obligation to remain loyal to a company, the primary function of business is profit, and the analogy between business and team is erroneous.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the corporate world, whistleblowing is one of the hardest things that employees are expected to do when a company is doing wrong. Whistleblowers must decide whether to stay loyal to the company who has taken care of them or to present the truth to the public. There are some conditions to being a whistleblower, one must make sure that the accusations are true, backed by concrete evidence, unbiased and for the better of the public. Some say choosing to whistle blow is a violation of the loyalty that was given to the employee. Whistleblowing is like biting the hand that feeds you, but the public must be careful concerning whistleblowers accusations because some could just be seeking fame and fortune or to get their own personal bias of…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Wild Oats Case Study

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Businesses with an Internet presence must be vigilant to make sure that securities laws and regulations are not violated. While this clearly applies to company-managed websites and blogs, it also means that employees and executives need to be careful about what they say in other forums, including on Twitter or third-party message boards. The CEO of Whole Foods was taken to task for a series of message board postings he had made under a pseudonym, talking down his company’s competitor, Wild Oats. When Whole Foods later acquired Wild Oats, the SEC investigated to determine whether his postings had been an illegal attempt to affect Wild Oat’s stock price. While the SEC ultimately took no action against him or Whole Foods, the incident demonstrates…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Menendez, the whistleblower wasn’t included in the important meeting that Halliburton arranged. Throughout the meeting, KPMG was present without the employee Menendez. This meeting held the fact that there would be an accounting topic of a joint venture. However, SEC would find reasons in awkward situations considering KPMG and why they shouldn’t have had been in the RTA meeting consulted by Haliburton. KPMG’s profession and influence can impact the way that the shareholders’ opinion can react up at the end.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Internal Whistleblowers

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Apparently, before exposing any irregularity or a concern to either the company or the external stakeholders, the whistleblowers take some considerable time to acquire a solid basis for their claims. As discussed below by the use of an illustrative example, there is a sequential decision-making process applied by the whistleblowers. Sherry Hunt, a mother of two sons, worked as a vice president and chief underwriter of the correspondent channel at CitiMortgage's headquarters. There before, Sherry Hunt had worked in several top banks in the United States; therefore, she had a long working experience with different financial institutions. Sherry was always proud and happy with her job, as her clients could achieve their goals through her work.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Group has adopted a Whistleblower Policy that is designed to support and encourage staff to report in good faith matters such as: Unacceptable practices; Irregularities or conduct which is an offence or a breach of laws of PNG (actions & decisions against the laws of PNG including non-compliance);  Corruption;  Fraud;  Misrepresentation of facts;  Decisions made & actions taken outside established BSP policies & procedures;  Sexual harassment;  Abuse of Delegated Authorities;  Misuse of Group assets;  Disclosures related to miscarriages of justice;  Health and safety risks, including risks to the public as well as other employees;  Damage to the environment;  Other unethical conduct;  Failure to comply with appropriate professional…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hearing about these giant fraud cases, especially the ones you talk about in class often like Enron; I always wonder how they are caught, or even how long it takes. As an example from a while back, but still seen as one of the largest Ponzi schemes in history the Madoff Fraud Case. This case took a while for the SEC to catch onto what was going on. As we learned in class the SEC is out there in the financial industry to keep the stock market fair and honest. The SEC authority is given by congress and allows them to bring in civil enforcement against companies or individuals breaking any type of SEC rule.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Study Question for Module 2: Truth & Disclosure Disclosure of information, although simple and easy to understand to most of the public, seems to always be a tough consideration for businesses and their leaders. Unfortunately, disclosure of information can be very detrimental to what business leaders hold dearest: the bottom line. This adherence to the bottom line, the need to consistently improve results, and the incentives given to executives for maximizing shareholder returns impacts the amount of information voluntarily disclosed to the public. However, executives do have an obligation to disclose information that will harm company by virtue of morals, ethics, and by government regulations. Even though it may harm your organization, information regarding clear conflicts of interest (such as the sources of funding, other sources employment, and governance) should always be disclosed as it gives the public a strong level of trust in one’s actions or statements.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whistleblower Sociology

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This week in class we focused in depth on whistleblowers. U.S. civic activist Ralph Nader coined the phrase in the early 1970s to avoid negative connotations found with other words such as “snitch”. I applaud his attempt to create a better word, yet whistleblowers are often times deemed snitches. Also, when people tend to think of whistleblowers, they probably think of WikiLeaks or individuals exposing important government information such as corruption when it comes to money or the military, however, whistleblowing does not have to be a big issue. It can simply be something wrong that is exposed.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whistleblowing is encouraged in the workforce and supposedly will be protected more for being honest. Serpico’s article suggest that companies’ should make potential employees be tested with a personality test to avoid those who are short-tempered or have a negative impact. For whistleblowing, If any employee feels that they need to take an unethical situation to the next head or higher rank, the first person who comes to the securities exchange commission that could show credible information that leads to a finding that a company have violated rules of Dodd Frank Law, they get 10% of the fine. However, that employee have to use their internal mechanisms first, showing that they tried to tell someone and failed to be acknowledge. By being a whistleblower, you are benefitting a lot for being an honest person and companies would be more cautious enough to not do any unethical actions.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays