Why Is Whistleblowing Wrong

Superior Essays
Whistleblowing has been a topic of discussion in business for over a hundred years. While there are federally mandated regulations in place to protect whistleblowers, some still argue that whistleblowing is wrong. The main argument of these naysayers, like Norman Bowie and Sissela Bok, is that whistleblowing is an act of disloyalty to the company. In Ronald Duska’s article Whistleblowing II, he takes opposition to this stance. Throughout his article he makes three main points: employees have no obligation to remain loyal to a company, the primary function of business is profit, and the analogy between business and team is erroneous. It’s important to consider the types of groups where loyalty is appropriate. Bok says, “since (the whistleblower) …show more content…
Loyalty within a team is in the context of a sport/competition; in which the goal is winning. In general, sport is a social convention and winning in sport is harmless. “One can lose at sport with precious few serious consequences. The consequences of losing at business are much more serious” (Duska, 5). A business cannot be compare to a team because (as in sport) we voluntarily join a team and accept the risks of being a part of it. Everyone is forced to participate in business. “(Businesses) are not controlled and are not over after a specific time. The activities of business affect the lives of everyone, not just the (employees)” (Duska, 5). Sports are in fact controlled by referees (whistleblowers), are contained to a restricted period of time, and do not directly affect anyone who is not playing the game. Duska reveals an understanding for why corporations compare themselves to a team (to appeal to team loyalty), but states that it is seriously …show more content…
I believe that there are situations where employees have an obligation to remain loyal to their company. One example is when your employer pays (or assists in paying) for your education. If your employer pays for you to get your MBA, you should feel obligated to spend at least a few years at the company. After all, they are investing in you and are expecting a return on their investment. With that said, employees are contractually bound to fulfill their contract with their employers as long as the contract was agreed upon without coercion (Sandel). Employment contracts should involve a simple exchange of labor and money; it should never require more. “One sells one’s labor but not one’s self to a company” (Duska, 4). As employees we have a responsibility to exchange reasonable work for fair wages – we are being paid for our labor, not our

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Businesses like to make the false argument of working as a team, but Duska states “loyalty to a team is loyalty within the context of sport or a competition. The business world is not a sport though. You have any obligation to your company, you are there for the sole purpose to make money and provide for yourself or your family. It is too easy to leave your company or for them to let you go to be loyal to them. Whistleblowing is a necessity if it is for the benefit of others or yourself.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It aims to serve its own self-interest. With that being said, it does not mean that corporations do no produce any external benefits or does not help the community in any way. Rather, it means that corporations only produce external benefits when it serves its own purpose in the process. Joel Bakan, the author of the famous book “The Corporation the Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power”, acknowledges the contributions a corporation makes to the community. However, Bakan realizes that these contributions are either an indirect result of a company’s actions or is done to facilitate the company’s goal in the long run.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The National Labor Relations Acts states that management cannot: 1) cannot stop employees from organizing a group that helps protect their employment and benefits the employee, 2) cannot support financially or support in any other way the formation of a labor organization, and 3) cannot encourage or discourage employees from joining a labor organization and we cannot discriminate against these employees in any way (Bernardin, 2013, p. 330). We as a management team must respect the intentions and actions of each employee who supports the union and we cannot persuade or punish employees for choosing to join a labor union. All we can do is keep the company running successfully and hope that in the end the right decision will be…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is why in order to run an outstanding business platform, you have to hire only the High Performance Happy people. They know what to do at all times and if they do not know, then they ask for help. Employers automatically just assume that they know what they are doing if they do not ask for help. Along with this comes key responsibility in this type of workforce. Employers should trust their employees with any decision that needs to be made; not just decisions about the work that is needed to be done, but they also have to trust them to handle their paid time off and any vacations they take.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    If every member of the team has different objectives they are no better than the crowds. Building a good team requires balance. The ideal teammate follows orders without question and wants nothing in return. Friends and family may be willing to be a part of a team free of charge, yet will likely set their eyes on their own Black Friday deals. Mercenaries or other forms of hireable labor will not have this problem, although they will expect a paycheck, cutting into Black Friday savings.…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vasquez has an interesting organizational chart and structure. He does not have a written out chart, but the idea behind the structure of his organization is that he is his own boss and has no one above or below him. He reports to no one and has no one reporting to him. However, when analyzing it more he does have to report to whoever he is working for at the time, his clients. Because his business relies on clients coming to him for his services he must listen to what they want and ultimately do what they want.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We want to pursue a good life and never want to do or live in an evil manner. But what actions can we take to live a good life? What we are already doing are we on the right path? Rand tells us that we to organize views and what is the most important in our lives, we must be strong will and keep a clear mind with trying to avoid contradictions. She gives us an example about you working at a company, and you are trying your best to make money for yourself and a profit for your company honestly.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Any deviation will be considered outside of scope of employment and individual will be liable for any misconduct • Conflicts regarding different laws in different countries will not be an issue because we will be based and operate only in the United States. • When selecting suppliers, we will only do business with those who supply products ethically and in a sustainable manner that is respectful of their employees, community and environment. • Subcontractors will be monitored at all times by an on-site manager connected with our business to ensure ethical behavior and…

    • 1026 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firing them for not meeting unattainable goals and forcing them to act unethically to keep their jobs is not how one should act upon the people holding the foundation of the company together. • Taking responsibility for ones actions is a valued component of respect in today’s society: As the investigation continues on the scam, Executives and Branch leaders are being forced to exit their positions. Bonuses are being taken away and possibilities of incrimination are being discussed. By taking responsibility, this problem could have been resolved years ago. Because there was no decision to end the scam or responsibility taken for wrongdoing, society is enforcing its full wrath on the company.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The controversial issue, Friedman case emphasize that businesses does not have responsibilities, in regards to, individuals who proctor over the company. In addition, Friedman (1970) address the concern of managers’ responsibilities away from the businesses like his home, his church, his mind, and other social activities. Moreover, his theory refers to mangers as agents; therefore, managers has to act in accordance to the owners’ specification (Friedman, 1970). The sole propriety of the manager is to make a profit while spending someone else’s’ revenue. This know theory is call the “free society” (Friedman, 1970).…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays