Keystone XL Pipeline Research Paper

Improved Essays
The Keystone XL pipeline is consisting of 1,179-mile-long pipeline to transport up to 800,000 roughly of barrels per day of oil crude from Alberta, Canada and the Bakken Shale on Montana. This pipeline would cross the U.S border near Morgan, Montana, South Dakota, and Nebraska, where it would be connected to existing pipeline facilities near Steel City, Nebraska for onward delivery to Cussing, Oklahoma and the Texas Gulf Coast region. The Canadian company TransCanada initially proposed the pipeline in 2005 and applied to the State Department for a construction permit in 2008. However, TransCanada, the company behind the project is still waiting for the State Department to approve it. Keystone XL pipeline is one of the most controversial projects in American politics due to the proponents and the opponents of the pipeline. Some Americans, especially proponent of the environmental argue that this project will badly affect the environment and climate change, which would cause a massive carbon dioxide on the air. They also argue that Canadian government should not support this project, due to the mass …show more content…
I think the mass producer of carbon dioxide is in the Asian Pacific region. Such as, China and India where, there many corporations that are producing greenhouses, but have no clear intention to decrease it. There are many ways that both U.S and Canada government can come up with plans to reduce the carbon dioxide produce with technology. Moreover, if environmentalist believe that this project will be a disaster for the climate change. Instead, they can transport oil by rails, but bringing oil by rail is also having its risk and hazards. For instance, carrying the huge amount of oil can also be exploded. It can cause severely damage in the air and land. In most severe cases, if there is a big explosion while carrying oil by rails, it might take many people’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Also in the article Should the United States Authorize the Keystone XL Pipeline to Import Tar Sand Oil from Canada, it talks about how, "Indigenous peoples (known as First Nations) in Canada are taking the lead to stop the largest industrial project on Mother Earth: the Tar Sands Gig project. Northern Alberta is ground zero with over 20 corporations operating in the tar sands sacrifice zone, with expanded developments being planned. The cultural heritage, land, ecosystems and human health of First Nation communities... are being sacrificed for oil money in what has been termed a 'slow industrial genocide'. Infrastructure projects linked to the tar sands expansion such as... the Keystone XL pipeline, threaten First Nation communities in British…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though there are many reasons to support why Keystone XL pipeline will be a very good idea, there are also many reasons that support that the oppositions gave the reasons why this Keystone XL Pipeline will be a problem to society. A lot of people opposite this idea of building the Keystone XL pipeline, because they consider this pipeline will not create as many jobs as it is promised. “Energy and Commerce Ranking Member Henry Waxman (D-CA) went as far as to argue that pipeline jobs are not "real jobs" - a stance that several labor unions representing millions of American workers might be surprised to hear. After all, organized labor has lined up in support of this pipeline because of the jobs it would provide for union workers” (Energy).…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dakota Access Pipeline Controversy Introduction The Dakota Access Pipeline, or DAPL, is a proposed pipeline that would run one-thousand two-hundred miles from North Dakota to Illinois and carry more than four-hundred and seventy thousand barrels of crude oil. Ninety-nine percent of the land the pipeline covers is private land and does not need federal approval for construction. The Army Corps of Engineers reviewed the remaining one percent and concluded construction would have no serious impact on the environment. They decided to build the pipeline slightly north of the Standing Rock Reservation, directly through the tribe’s burial grounds, without their approval. The tribe believes that the pipeline would ruin the environment and their drinking water, despite the Corps’ claims.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    how would you if someone built something on your land that potentially be dangerous to you and your land. Is it fair for them to do it to you but not to others because of racism? The Dakota pipeline is an example of that. The government doesn’t think of the possibilities of what could happen all they are worry about is the money they will be receiving when it’s all complete. I don’t believe we should be building things on their land because they are the first people that discovered there land.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dakota Access Pipeline has sparked controversy throughout America primarily in the past year due to differing beliefs about the sacred land that construction supposedly is ruining. After months of protests and spirit camps, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, a tribe that was relatively silent while others took action to protect their water supply , is taking the DAPL case to court using two deliberately planned legal strategies. Although the pipeline is complete and oil could start flowing any day, the tribe refuses to back down. However, funding legal battles can be tough, which is why the tribe has created a funding campaign on CrowdJustice, a platform to increase awareness and raise money for legal cases. While the protest camps have been forcefully evacuated, hope is not lost.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    President trump told the Army Corps of Engineers to proceed to do a review of the easement. Later a letter from Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army Paul D. Cramer to Rep. Raúl M. Grijalva stated the the pipeline would go through federal property. That statement hurt the protesters but the proud protesters said they would stand their ground and defy the government. The pipeline is made to bring oil from North Dakota to the Midwest.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Keystone XL Pipeline is one of the most controversial policy issues in the last few years. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent on not only physical pipeline building but also on lobbyist movements to either approve or vote down the proposed pipeline. With potentially massive environmental effects looming, the battle between an environmentally conscious president and an opposing Congress has grown into an international dispute. Legislation for the pipeline was first introduced in 2008 when TransCanada “began construction the Keystone Pipeline after the United States issued a Presidential Permit authorizing the construction, maintenance, of the pipeline along the border of the United States and Canada” (O’Rourke) Despite Canadian…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the defining elements of the relationship between the federal government and First Nations is the struggle over access to and control of natural resources. This conflict, which is political as often as it is legal, has most recently materialized in the fight over the Keystone XL Pipeline proposal, which pits Indians defending the borders of their reservations against a federal government eager to undertake a project which would reduce dependency on foreign oil. Native American agitation over the proposal is a contemporary example of protest by a non-political minority group whose outsider status prevents it from exercising its property rights within a capitalist system. Minority groups separate from the body which forms a social contract…

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Dakota Pipeline is in the process of being built to connect the oil rich areas of North Dakota to Illinois. The hope of completing the pipeline, would make moving crude oil to the refineries in the Gulf Coast or East Coast areas a lot easier. President Obama, in November of 2015, put a stop to the pipeline being built because of the controversy that it caused (Yan, Park, Ravits and Sidner, 2017). By putting an end to the controversy about the construction of the pipeline, it put a stop to the disagreements, and protesting over the project that went on throughout most of Obama’s presidency (Yan, Park, Ravits and Sidner, 2017). On the 24th of January 2017, President Trump signed an executive order to finish the Dakota Pipeline; however, the pipeline would need to be in agreement with the law before it can be completed (Yan, Park, Ravits and Sidner, 2017).…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perhaps one of the most widely debated topics, in recent years, is the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline. The completion of the project has been done in multiple phases and one of the last phases scheduled to be completed is the phase 4 extension. This extension would create a pipeline that would trek, around 2000 miles, from Alberta Canada to the gulf coast of Texas (Friends of the Earth). Since the pipeline would cross international borders, approval from congress would be necessary in order to begin construction (NPR). The two main issue points on the topic are the economic gains that could incur from the development of the pipeline and the overall impression on the environment that would ensue from extraction, transportation, and refining of the oil.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Winona LaDuke, a Native American activist, stated, “In the end, there is no absence of irony: the integrity of what is sacred to Native Americans will be determined by the [U.S] government that has been responsible for doing everything in its power to destroy Native American cultures” (cite). This paper argues that the Dakota Access Pipeline is represented in the media as government intrusion and exploitation of Native Americans through environmental racism. The Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) is 1,172 miles long and made to carry oil from North Dakota to southern Illinois; however, this project is controversial, sparking protests, due to it crossing the drinking water source of the Standing Rock Sioux, a Native American tribe. The first news…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction The Keystone Pipeline was a proposed idea of a pipeline that would run from the oil sands of Canada to Steele City, Nebraska (“Keystone” 1). It would then connect with an existing pipeline that would administer it elsewhere. Since the proposal was for an oil pipeline that would cross international borders, it needed the President’s approval. The idea became such a controversial topic when President Obama stated that six days to decide the fate of this project was not a sufficient amount of time to make a decision.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Keystone Pipeline is a Legitimate Issue and Should Not Be Approved The controversy surrounding the Keystone XL Pipeline proposal steams from very legitimate concerns. While the issue has attracted support from some parties, it is apparent that many, including environmental activists, civilians and politician have strongly opposed the move, but the big question is, what are the specific reasons is in all this? According to Natural Resource Defense Council, NADR a New York based natural environment gives a comprehensive account why the move will be disastrous not only to natural environment but also to people (NADR). In addition, other non- partisan organizations like the Friends of Earth have also voiced their opposition to…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Keystone XL Pipeline is the proposed last segment of the greater Keystone Pipeline project owned by TransCanada which would run from Hardisty, Alberta (in Canada) to Steele City, Nebraska. The proposed pipeline would carry oil sands from Canada to refineries on the Gulf Coast (Cama and Wilson 14).This pipeline would utilize a bitumen-harvesting process which is more environmentally damaging and less efficient than the tradition oil drilling process. Additionally, the pipeline has been controversial due to the environmental hazards tin its operation (Issitt). One of the major groups of protestors to the Keystone Pipeline are Native American Tribes including the Northern Arapaho Tribe, Yankton Sioux Tribe, and Blackfeet tribe. Their feelings…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Department of the Interior is responsible for the conservation and or management of the natural resources and most of the land. Within the Department of Interior is the bureau of Indian Affairs, it’s one of the oldest bureaus in the Department of Interior; they handle some of the federal affairs with Native Americans. Civil rights is what we have been fighting for since the beginning of time. Each step we have took in life has made baby steps to our new and improved future with the rights we deserve without discrimination of our appearance of color or even sexual orientation. The goal for the Department of Interior is to enforce civil rights laws and regulate and ensure equal opportunities for all.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays