The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Bomb Testing

Improved Essays
Is a bomb that could wipe out hundreds and thousands of lives powerful? During World War 2 the city of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from Japan got devastated because of the United States bomb invention which is the nuclear bomb. United States dropped the first bomb on the city of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, according to the articles about 65,000 to 200,000 people kick the bucket. After the destruction of Hiroshima, Japan still did not surrender. United States dropped the second bomb on Nagasaki which made them give up, one of the article stated that 39,000 people were assassinated and 25,000 were injured. A year after World War 2, United States conduct a nuclear bomb test at Bikini Atoll. Base on the article, bikini atoll is from Micronesia, 2.3 square miles, and people have been living there for generationss. According on “The Radioactive Atoll” …show more content…
United States should have looked for another atoll to use for the nuclear bomb test, the one that is uninhabited. The Bikinians did not have to suffer for about 26 years if the United States used different atoll to test the bombs. It’s understandable that the United States used Bikini Atoll as their testing site because it is isolated and far from the sea and routes. The only problem was the Bikinians who have been living on Bikini Atoll for generation. But they could have helped the Bikinians when they moved from place to another, when they needed food the most. Also now Bikini Atoll is full of radioactive, the food, drinking water, the land, and also the people who live there. Some of the animals on the ocean or sea life have been extinct caused by the nuclear bomb blast or the radiation afterwards. Always consider everyone else before making a decision, if it makes them safe and protected or

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If the United States decided against using the atomic bomb, U.S. soldiers would have invaded Japanese islands. This operation was named Operation Downfall, and this invasion would have led to thousands of casualties. Japan was willing the literally fight to the death and President Truman knew that if we didn’t use the atomic bomb that the United States would continue to fight as long as Japan was still standing. An ironic justification for dropping the bomb is not only did it save American lives, but it also saved Japanese lives. It was predicted that if Operation Downfall took place that anywhere from 5 to 10 million Japanese casualties would have occurred.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As research continues, newer and better technologies are invented. This new technology is being used in almost all aspects of life, from day-to-day life, research, military, medical and many other fields. One such technology is the development of nuclear power. Nuclear energy is “the energy held in the nucleus of an atom; it can be obtained through two types of reactions – fission and fusion”1. Recently nuclear energy has become more important because of its various uses and applications, its effects on the environment, and based on the church’s opinions and the opinions of the military and governments, nuclear energy is an important tool that humans should continue to research and develop, but only its non-violent applications.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The decision to use the atomic bomb posed several significant moral dilemmas for President Harry S. Truman, among these were justifications, alternatives, and complications of the situation. After Teddy Roosevelt 's death, Truman was the new president with a huge decision to make only a few months after. People felt Truman was an insecure man and poorly informed by Roosevelt until his entry to the presidency. It was months later that he learned of America’s dark secret, the Manhattan Project. There were presumably three possible alternatives available to Americans to avoid using the atomic bomb such as invasion, increasing bomb threats and blockades of Japan, and negotiating peace.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Out of the seventeen types of cancers considered, the atomic bomb victims suffered from sixteen of them and by 1950, up to 200,000 people died due to cancer and the long term effects of the radiation. Although the bombs were dropped over 70 years ago, its effects can still be seen today, proving the huge impact atomic bombs…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision to use nuclear weapons The decision, made by the United States of America, to drop nuclear bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may not have been the most popular or best choice for the planet; but however, it was the choice that needed to be made to end the war in the pacific. This decision was made so that both sides would suffer the lowest number of casualties possible. The United States had a conference with Japanese leaders to attempt to bring the war to an end peacefully, however the Japanese had made it very clear to the United States and president Truman that they had no intention of abandoning the code of honor they live by and would fight until the last man. After this conference the Decision to drop…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Atomic Bomb Research Paper

    • 1018 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Some victims were vaporized instantly, many survivors were horribly disfigured, and death from radiation was uncertain—it might not claim its victims for days, weeks, months, or even years. The initial death count in Hiroshima, set at 42,000–93,000, was based solely on the disposal of bodies, and was thus much too low. Later surveys covered body counts, missing persons, and neighborhood surveys during the first months after the bombing, yielding a more reliable estimate of 130,000 dead as of November 1945. A similar survey by officials in Nagasaki set its death toll at 60,000–70,000. (Its plutonium bomb was more powerful, but its destructive range was limited by surrounding hills and mountains)(- Destructive Effects).…

    • 1018 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This barbaric act has everyone questioned. At 8:15 am on August 6, 1945 the United States dropped an atomic bomb which carried 20,000 tons of TNT on Hiroshima, Japan instantly wiping out about 140,000 people. After three days later another bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, Japan. About 80,000 more people died. Mostly civilians died during this tragic time.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan was a sad and tragic event that killed thousands of innocent Japanese people. This fatal event could have been prevented with a single decision from our American Government in 1945. Our American government and President Truman decided that it would be better to take the lives of Japanese civilians, than to use a different plan that could have saved their lives. Michael Barnes is correct when he argues about atomic bombs being unnecessary to use in World War Two, because it took the lives of innocent people, it may have been racially motivated, and alternatives could have been made instead of using this weapon of mass destruction.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American soldiers dropped two atomic bombs in Japan, one on the town of Hiroshima and one on the town of Nagasaki. Before the war Hiroshima was the seventh largest city in the county and contained a population of over 340,000, Hiroshima was the administrative and commercial center of the South Western portion of the island. The bombing came as a complete surprise and left people with no time to take shelter which was one of the main attributes that contributed to the unreal casualty rate. Three days following the bombing of Hiroshima the city of Nagasaki - which contained the largest population density of approximately 65,000 people per square mile even after the town was evacuated - was hit with an atomic bomb. Although the devastation was much less than that of the Hiroshima bombing, due to more warning and evacuation time, it was still indeed an atomic bomb and wreaked havoc on the city for…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S government stated that the reasoning for choosing Hiroshima and Nagasaki was due to them being classified as legitimate military targets, yet in truth there were little military personnel within both cities. Even though Hiroshima was home to the Japanese Second Army HQ only about 10,000 of the estimated 17,000 deaths were military servicemen, in Nagasaki there were even less, an approximate 150 military members perished out of the 80,000 total casualties that come out to be 95% civilian casualties (The Truth About the Bombing). The worst has yet to come, when the bomb detonated the “heart of the explosion reached a temperature of several million degrees centigrade” all people within a half a mile radius were killed instantaneously, around 63% of the buildings, and 92% of all structures within Hiroshima were annihilated (The Truth About the Bombing). Those who were not killed the first day, yet still in the blast radius, died shortly after from severe burns, those who were only in the radiation radius died weeks to month to years after from too much radiation, and women who were pregnant gave birth to still borns, or children with serious birth defects (The Truth About the Bombing). The truth is, is that the bombs are not a one and done type thing it is a long drawn out process that people decades later are still affected by.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. made a good decision when it decided that it wanted to use the atomic bomb. Japan was just not going to give up. Although it is admirable how hard they fought and how far they were willing to go they should’ve known when it was just time to stop. It had been a long war and it was just time for it to end. The U.S. had given Japan a chance to go for unconditional surrender but Japan refused.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    BIKINI ATOLL Bikini Atoll is just a normal, small, island-like landform, right? Wrong! Bikini Atoll was where one of the most dangerous hydrogen bombs the US has ever created was tested. Today, 60 years after it was tested, the islands are still deserted due to radiation! I'm going to tell you what happened there, how its like now, and talk a bit about the damage.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Half of these numbers were people killed on the day the bomb went off. This number is outrageous and is a tragedy in itself to even look at these gruesome statistics, but in only affecting two cities to cause Japan to finally surrender,…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In 1945, Japan was attacked with an Atomic Bomb. President Truman advised the bombs to be in place when bombing Japan. I believe that Truman should have done things differently before the bombing, but I also believe that he should have bombed Japan, but, I’m in a strong belief that they shouldn’t have bombed Japan. The reasons I believe that they shouldn’t be, they could have worked out a better form of issues to resolve, bombed it differently without the use of Atomic bombs, and lastly, let the Japanese people live in America. Japan and the United States should have resolved issues so they wouldn’t need to go to war.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People have different thoughts on if the U.S should retain or dismantle their nuclear arsenal. People that think it should be kept make arguments like how nuclear weapons help keep the U.S safe and how they can be used if there were to be any sort of war. On the contrary People that feel our nuclear weapons should be dismantled say our nuclear weapons cost too much to be kept and they make us seem hostile to other nations. So should the U.S keep its nuclear arsenal? Well there are lots of pros and cons to both sides of this argument.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays