The Pros And Cons Of Bombing Japan

Decent Essays
In 1945, Japan was attacked with an Atomic Bomb. President Truman advised the bombs to be in place when bombing Japan. I believe that Truman should have done things differently before the bombing, but I also believe that he should have bombed Japan, but, I’m in a strong belief that they shouldn’t have bombed Japan. The reasons I believe that they shouldn’t be, they could have worked out a better form of issues to resolve, bombed it differently without the use of Atomic bombs, and lastly, let the Japanese people live in America.
Japan and the United States should have resolved issues so they wouldn’t need to go to war. The Japanese people should have told the president what was really going on that they shouldn’t be bombing Japan. Truman should have declared the war differently if he wanted the war to end. I would have told Truman to come to an agreement with Japan to stop the War. An agreement with Japan would have been put in play and should have made a Treaty to respect the United States and Japan.
…show more content…
The bombs should have never been made and should have never been dropped. There are other ways to stop the bombing in Japan. Like for instance, you don’t need an Atomic bomb to stop Japan, just would need kind words and words of an agreement like I said before. The other cities that were untouched should have just been raided by the troops and not the bombs. Bombs should have been our last resort.
America shouldn’t be so bias when it comes to living in America. Not everyone is going to be treated equal, so why treat Japanese people different? We treated the blacks differently and now Japan, why keep it going? Some people were born American and not in Japan, although they are Japanese they shouldn’t be moving them, if anything they should have been helping them. I would advise Truman to help the Japanese people and stop this nonsense

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the aftermath of the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor the United States retaliated on August 6, 1945, at 8:15 a.m. the crew of the Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb over the city of Hiroshima. The bomb detonated 2,000 feet above the center of Hiroshima, destroying 60% of the city and killing an estimated 70,000 to 100,000 people immediately. Due to amount of civilian deaths this led to, we often ask ourselves if the bombings over these Japanese cities were necessary. To debate wether the bombing was necessary we should pay attention to Japans decision to continue to not surrender after the first bombing. If a country is that proud and resilient for them to still refuse to surrender after one nuclear bombing killing between 70,000 to 100,000…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I agree with what you are saying. The lives of the Japanese people could have been saved and taken into more consideration. Dropping of the Atomic bomb was preventable, but I think when considering that it was to show power I can see why they did it. That doesn't make it right by any means, we need to consider all sides of situation before taking…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, those who believe that the act stems from racism state that the atomic bomb would not have been used on anyone other than the Japanese. For the most part, those against Truman’s decision believe that if they had the bomb in earlier times it would not have been used still. For example, Michael Barnes, author of “Arguments Against the Atomic Bomb,” insists “that had the bomb been ready in time it never would have been used against Germany.” (n.d.). In addition, the opposition has a right to believe this opinion.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should the United states have dropped atomic bombs on Japan? During the time of 1941-1945 a brutal war was fought between the U.S and the Japanese. Killing many soldiers and civilians. The way many of these people died was by an atomic bomb dropped by the U.S.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Truman as the leader of the free world took a lot of flak for his decisions of dropping the atomic bombs in japan because people felt as though he didn’t have to go that far, but ask yourself if you were under the same circumstances how would you react to these issues. There wasn’t any right decision to make it, the only choice was to make the decision that saved the most lives and saved the most money. Truman felt as though if we continued to fight, both sides would have exhausted their militaries, and also exhausted their countries finically destroying both countries…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tens of thousands were killed in the bombing, naming it inhumane. The bomb’s purpose was not to harm innocent people, its purpose was to first get the Japanese government to surrender, if didn’t surrender then attack cities that help create war material. Innocent lives could have been saved if they evacuated the cities as warned. The dropping of the two atomic bombs saved millions of lives of Americans and the lives of Japaneses. The Japanese government plan was to invade America in a land invasion, causing up to 5 to 10 million casualties of Japanese fighters.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United State’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan during World War ll is one of the most arguable controversies in American history due to the questionable reasoning behind its use, and the horrific effects it had on Japanese citizens. At the time of the bombing it was actually supported by a vast majority of the American public. During 1945, the decision to use the bomb was not only supported but encouraged. In August of 1945 opinion polls given to the American public showed 85% of Americans supported bombing Japan (Hadley, 21). On the contrary, historians such as Gar Alperovitz have argued Truman used the bomb merely to gain political status and power over the Soviets.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bombing in Japan In August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, causing major destruction and life threatening issues, over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Everyone has their own take on what really happened and have their own perspective on controversies regarding the United States’ decision to drop the bombs. Perspectives that I will be discussing today are from three disciplines: scientific view (Leo Szilard), journalism view (Wilfred Bruchett), and historical view (a writer of an article called “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” and Bernard Feld’s article “Lessons from Hiroshima and Nagasaki”). Each have their own unique approach on the atomic bomb and it’s affects.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths. Even today, many debate whether or not the US should have dropped the atomic bombs. Not only have the bombs killed many Japanese, the bombs also caused radiation sickness. However, these bombs were effective in that they ended one of the most costly wars the world has seen. Although the results of the atomic bombs were devastating to Japan, the US was justified in dropping the bombs because it swiftly ended the war, which effectively saved more lives than it costed.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Given what knowledge that President Harry S. Truman had at the time I would have still dropped the bomb on Hiroshima. We had been bombing Japanese cities as early in the war as 1942. In 1945 we firebombed Tokyo killing more 80,000 people. In response to this Truman remarked, “Despite their heavy losses at Okinawa and the firebombing of Tokyo, the Japanese refused to surrender. The saturation bombing of Japan took much fiercer tolls and wrought far and away more havoc than the atomic bomb.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Bomb During the summer of 1945, things were looking pretty grim for Imperial Japan, as they were the last axis power left and had been under constant firebombing for the United States, President Truman chose to drop two atomic bombs, one on Hiroshima on August 6th and one on Nagasaki on August 9th. Since before either of the two bombs had been dropped, it has been debated whether or not it was the right decision. Truman stated that the bombs were dropped to save American lives, but many argue over the government’s other motives at the time. Many bring up valid points over why the bomb should not have been dropped and that the government public justification for dropping the bomb was based off of false information, but ultimately the motivation behind dropping the bomb, hidden by the government or not, outweighs the reasons for not dropping the bomb.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Decades after the atomic bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Americans still question whether it was a good idea to drop them. One of the reasons the bombs should have been dropped is the bombing of Pearl Harbor. The United States and Japan were at peace until Japan bombed a military base in Hawaii and afterward, president Franklin D. Roosevelt declared war on Japan. In his well-known infamy speech, FDR stated, “I ask that the Congress declare that since the unprovoked and dastardly attack by Japan on Sunday, December 7th, 1941, a state of war has existed between the United States and the Japanese empire.” America and its people saw the bombing as an act of war and in return, they declared war.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Was America justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? On August 6th, 1945, the US dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. It was the first time a nuclear weapon had been used in combat, against civilians. Between 40,000 and 60,00 people died instantly, and many more would die in the aftermath, either due to their injuries or radiation poisoning.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Was the U.S justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War? Discuss the benefits and costs that it resulted.” 1. Introduction During World War Two, the U.S dropped two atomic bombs on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing high death rates upon the Japanese. Many people may argue that the bombings were devastating and have had a dreadful effect on people’s lives.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Abhorrent but Necessary On August 6, 1945, the city of Hiroshima, Japan went up in smoke when “Little Boy,” an atomic bomb developed in the secretive Manhattan Project, was dropped. Three days later, the atomic bomb dubbed “Fat Man” obliterated another Japanese city, Nagasaki. The bombing itself and its effect on survivors’ health was devastating, and President Truman’s decision to drop the bombs remains highly controversial 71 years later. In fact, Naji Dahi, Ph.D., insists that the bombings were unnecessary, unjustified, and ineffective.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays