Brittany Manyard's Argument In Favor Of Euthanasia

Improved Essays
Matters of life and death are often extremely controversial and difficult for people to agree on. Such is the use of euthanasia, “the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma” which is illegal in a majority of the world. While to some it seems inhumane and unethical, withholding the ability to choose from someone who is suffering or incapable of living their life can cause misery or resorting to other (dangerous) methods of death. Patients who fall within euthanasia criteria should be able to take comfort in knowing the choice is theirs. If they decide for it, euthanasia needs to become available as soon as possible because current doctors, medical students and graduate students …show more content…
Four more states did the same in the following 20 years. It is not for every coma case or terminal illness, but doctors and patients alike in those 5 states take comfort in knowing that the option is there, legally. Brittany Manyard was a 29 year old woman with a malignant brain tumor in Oregon who chose euthanasia in prescribed medication prescribed shortly after saying her “... glioblastoma is going to kill me, and that 's out of my control. I 've discussed with many experts how I would die from it, and it 's a terrible, terrible way to die. Being able to choose to go with dignity is less terrifying… I believe this choice is ethical, and what makes it ethical is it is a choice. The patient can change their mind... I feel very protected here…” The doctor was able to fufill Manyard’s wishes because he had the training, experience, and ability, legally, to do …show more content…
Stookey watched his father suffer for a week, wondering the whole time why such a painful and long procedure was the only option. In October 2015, he stated “ I wish doctor-assisted death had been available to my father… I wish I could say he looked at peace in death, but he did not. There was a disturbing look… It was a look that will haunt me… that said: ‘Where, Son - where my doctor son - was my hemlock?’” Patients should not have to die this way, and doctors should not be forced into a position where they can have to tell their patients death by dehydration is the only option. Many more doctors and patients will be forced into situations like this if euthanasia is not legalized soon. The training needs to begin for those in school now because not all students know how to empathize with patients or cope with prescribing a lethal drug. It takes lot of time to learn and understand that, time that cannot continue to be wasted. Current students, who may have to take a class on morals or ethics, if that, and professionals are not prepared for the euthanasia situation future they may very well encounter in their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Finally, when it comes down to it, it’s the patient’s decision because it is their life and they should have the right to choose what to do with…

    • 1757 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many wonder if euthanasia is right and moral and if it is not what should be done when being faced with this situation. I think the best way to look at physician-assisted euthanasia is through consequentialism and deontology. It’s important we look at the consequences of physician-assisted suicide because they are literally the difference between life and death. A patient that is gravely ill or in a coma may be diagnosed and given a time limit until death, however, some patients have surprised their doctors.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I. Physician-assisted suicide, under various names and colloquial definitions, has been a documented ethical issue for centuries – not to mention an undocumented ethical issue since the hypothetical dawn of life. By common understanding, physician-assisted suicide is death either directly or indirectly permitted or carried out by a physician. In simple terms, an “out” is provided. For this reason, it is often associated with chronic pain or terminal illness. Suicide where the doctor in charge is directly involved is perhaps the first situation which comes to mind when one thinks of euthanasia.…

    • 2007 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death With Dignity The nation’s eyes opened when twenty nine-year-old Brittany Maynard publicly made the decision that she was going to end her life. When she learned that even with surgery her death was inevitable, she moved with her husband and mother to the first state that made the Death with Dignity Act legal, Oregon. Brittany Maynard did not want to die in vain: “She said, “I will rob cancer of the ability to take everything of me before it takes my life”” (Printz). The right to die with dignity is ethical in many cases similar to Brittany Maynard’s and should be available in The United States because people shouldn’t have to suffer severe illnesses, there should be an option available for Physician-Assisted death, which helps with peace of mind, and they should not face a penalty for going about the process.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The main argument about physician aid in dying and Euthanasia is whether or not it is ethical and whether or not it should be legal everywhere. However, the decision is the patient’s to make. The controversial topic of Physician Assisted Suicide is well known in the United States, and many people have found conflict in this practice because it breaks some religious values. The legalization of this practice, however is slowly progressing all over the world.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of life and death has always been a concept that many people try to avoid, but what happens when a loved one becomes too ill to live? This question has given rise to the idea of euthanasia and Physician-assisted suicide, which although may seem similar, have very different properties. Although physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia both support the belief that one has the right to choose their own fate, the constant backlash in society has limited its practice resulting in the disappearance of a method which, although unorthodox, offer a relief to people suffering from deadly diseases. Euthanasia is “the intentional killing by an act of . . . a dependent human being for his or her benefit” (MCCL.org) and involves two different methods.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Rachel’s argues against The Difference Thesis he says that the issue of active and passive euthanasia is not a morally relevant problem: there is no moral difference between killing and letting die (863-864). He believes that killing is not always worse than letting die. Rachel’s argument has exceptional impact on one’s ideas. He uses an example of two men Smith and Jones. Smith will inherit a large sum of money if something fatal were to happen to his 6 year .old…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    From a patient’s perspective that is in suffering, physician-assisted suicide might seem like a god send. The option to be relieved from the pain of a slow death at the cost of immediately ending their life seems grim and pointless, but to the dying, perhaps not. It was found that requests for euthanasia are frequently made by patients to doctors that practice specialties typically revolving around terminal patients. [Meier, D., Emmons, C. A., Wallenstein, S., Quill, T., Morrison, R. S., & Cassel, C. K., 1998]. The reasons patients ask for physicians to take part in ending their life are usually if they are in extreme pain, are a burden upon family members or caregivers, or have no personal dignity left.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ntroduction The Legal right to die describes in any situation of an adult who is in state of sound mind to decide about his or her treatment to be continued or not, where such voluntary, informed decision is made, should be recognized and respected. According to Lord Goff of Chieveley in 1993, at p. 864, in Airedale NHS Trust versus Bland [1993], the House of Lords held that “The principle of self-determination requires that respect must be given to the wishes of the patient. If an adult patient of sound mind refuses, however unreasonably, to consent to treatment or care by which his life would or might be prolonged, the doctors responsible for his care must give effect to his wishes, even though they do not consider it to be in his best interests to do so. […] To this extent, the principle of the sanctity of human life must yield to the principle of self-determination”.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We live in the year 2015, and still it is illegal to grant an individual in need the right to a peaceful departure. Euthanasia offers patients the option to leave their life happier than they would have been otherwise. Furthermore, it is a decision that a patient should be given the right to in times of intense suffering, considering that it is their own life. Finally, the absence of euthanasia has denied so many the end that they have desired through years of…

    • 1266 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The evolution of modern medicine has dramatically lengthened the life expectancy of human beings. In many cases, the quality of those life years are satisfactory, and elderly individuals enjoy life. However, there are also many people experience terminal diseases or tragic accidents that reduce their quality of life to the point they no longer want to live. In these cases, patients may plead with their doctor to end their life. Naturally, a physician ending the life of her patient is morally conflicting.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assisted Suicide, also known as the “Death by Dignity Act” be legalized in the remaining states? While legalized in three states in the United States, many others are adding it to the voting ballots for upcoming elections. The act was first passed in 1997, deeming it legal in the state of Oregon for terminally ill patient to have the choice to take a lethal dose of prescribed medication with no Doctor present. In the Advocate’s eye this gives the patient a choice, a right to end the pain and suffering when they feel necessary. The process is extensive and does have to be approved by the current physician as well as the consulting physician.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Their insistence becomes a matter of personal dignity, as they want to retain their humanity in the time before they die. This concept may sound simple and make sense to the majority of the population, but in reality, it is more complex than that because of the morality, ethicality, and religious aspects of this subject. Pre-existing taboos against euthanasia prevents this practice to be legal in the United States with the exception of Washington, Oregon, California, and Vermont. Each person in this country should have the right to choose the time and method of their own death when they believe there is no hope or cure for…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Watching someone slowly die is one of the worst things to witness, and it is impossible to understand the pain that they are going through. According to New Health Guide, human euthanasia is legal in Belgium, Colombia, India, Ireland, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, and some states in the U.S.. Human euthanasia is a medical practice that can end the pain of a terminally ill patient, the patients will use their rights in order to choose life or death. This method will be a compassionate response to someone’s suffering, and it will also shorten the grief of their family members and friends. It is a much more safer process, however, with the amount of power this practice takes, we must be made aware of how the…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays