One issue that seems to be reappearing in cancer treatments that are being used as a pain reliever instead of getting rid of the malignant cells. According to Delfino and Day “Aside from these drawbacks, the University of Wisconsin, …show more content…
Authors Delfino and Day explain the risks to radiation exposure. “ [Eric J.] Hall and [Li-Jun] Wu of the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and others point out that the very nature of IMRT necessitates a longer radiation time, a larger volume of non-malignant tissue exposed to radiation, and an increase in total exposure—all of which nearly double the risk of radiation-induced secondary cancers with post-exposure lifetime....”(3). This shows how that IMRT treatment can have serious risks to those with hardy cancer tumors. With the increase to radiation good cells and bad cells die. This offers a solution to the cancer but does not help with the side effects of losing the good cells. Side effects may include soreness, pain, diarrhea, sexual and reproductive issues, and …show more content…
This can be portrayed in clinical trials that are conducted for the treatment of cancer. “Clinical trials offer high-quality cancer care. If you are in a randomized study and do not receive the new treatment being tested ,you may receive the best known standard treatment….”(National Cancer Institute,10). This quote shows the positives in cancer clinics and their ability to attend to a patents needs. The clinics provide the newest type of cancer treatment to the the subjects. This treatment can be more beneficial than standard cancer treatment. The also provide the best means of standard care to those who do not receive the new treatment. The reason they must give standard care to some people is so that the scientists are able to compare the new treatment to the dated