Free Will Vs Incompatibilism

Decent Essays
Freedom of the Will
Consider a case involving hypnosis. When someone else decides our actions for us, do we have any input in what actions we take? When under the power of hypnosis, do we truly display the freedom of will? Are we truly free to make choices and act upon them? Freedom of the will, according to Frankfurt, is compatible with determinism; however, his inability to refute the possibility that second order desires may be predetermined allows for the conclusion that all humans truly do not possess freedom of the will and are only under the illusion that they do.
In order to fully understand free will, it is important to define it. Free will is determined as the ability to choose between many options and act upon the choice chosen.
…show more content…
The Compatibilist argues that free will and determinism are compatible with each other. On the other hand, the Incompatibilist states that free will and determinism are incompatible (397). For the incompatibilist, determinism does apply to freedom of the will. However, he claims that if things are predetermined then the person does not exhibit free will. The person will be predetermined to make only a certain choice, so he is not fully exhibiting free will (400). Free will is defined as the ability to choose among various alternatives and perform that decision. If things are predetermined, then the person will be unable to actually choose between different options, so the person is said to not have free will (400). In the bicyclist example, the bicyclist may love to ride his bike on a road with lots of turns because he loves the feeling of turning his bike very fast. This desire to ride on a path with a lot of turns predetermines his choice. He is very likely to choose this path, so he does not exhibit free …show more content…
For example, Frankfurt does not consider the fact that the second order desires can be determined by the first order desires (445). For example, the desire to eat or not eat pie precedes the desire to desire to eat pie or not eat pie, so there can be some influence of the first order desires on the second order ones. So, if second order desires are predetermined by the first order desires, the person does not have free will. Since he is already determined to pick a certain option, he is not exercising his free will. In essence, the determinism and free will are not compatible with each other in this case, so it does not follow Frankfurt’s

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The main reason of compatibilism is better than incompatibilism is that compatibilism think that freewill and determinism are compatible with each other and with this concept the conflict between freewill and determinism is abolished. Whereas, incompatibilism producing confliction between freewill and determinism by saying that they both are opposite to each other. But, compatibilism was unable to give proper definition of freewill. Compatibilism…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Free acts are caused by desires, motives or internal psychological states that are present in the individual’s mind while unfree acts are caused by physical forces or physical conditions that are present outside the individual. Stace then goes on to say that free will is compatible with determinism due to the fact that free acts are caused by desires and hopes, which demonstrates that the way an individual acts is determined by existing causes. Stace then brings up the fact that his definition of free will may not always function in every scenario because there are “mixed” cases in which it is difficult to identify whether the acts can be known as free acts or if they were compelled. Finally Stace discusses free will leading to moral responsibility and determinsim being compatible with both of these factors. He provides many different examples, his first is giving a boy a mild beating for lying.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Holbach states that it is not free will that causes you to perform an action, but it is his desire or motive which decides to perform an action. Meaning, the reason you decided to perform an action was to convince your opponent. The desire to convince your opponent was what made you perform your action instead of free will where your desires were created from temperament which is out of your control. All motives and ideas originate from your temperament which was created by laws nature created that you must obey without your consent, therefore you cannot do not have any free will on your motives, ideas, and desires. People believe that they are a free agent because they fail to understand the true motive that causes one to perform an action.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Free will is the known as the capability to decide between different potential courses of action and is a highly questioned topic in the philosophical world. Free will, also closely accompanied to the views of moral responsibility, has some philosophers reason that only actions which are free willed are justified to accept the blame of the action while other philosophers oppose this view. Baron d’Holbach views free will under the idea of Determinism, which entails that only one sequence of actions is possible, which concludes that there is no such thing as free will or choice in the truly deterministic world. In contrast, Compatibilist theorists, like Stace, assert that free will exists and can be well-matched with Determinism. The first theory…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    All these ideas seem be based on loose speculation that don’t have much merit in terms of the bigger picture. Proponents of the Libertarian view on free will would argue that free will is independent of agents of causation therefore, actions are based only on whether the individual desires to complete the action. At its core, Libertarianism rejects determinism and focuses on ideas that concern themselves with liberal independence. I would respond by stating that, actions need foundations from which they are based on. Human nature checks free will by allowing for a reason for actions being chosen and executed.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When we hear the word “will”, first thing which arises in our mind is my choice. In our society, humans are involved by freedom but all the laws and rules have limited are freedom to a level. Tough not much freedom in many things but we do have freewill. Many philosophers have claimed that we should do what we actually want to do, which means that we should obey our freewill. In contrast, Sam Harris objected about the real concept of freewill.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A dilemma is considered a situation in which you have to make a difficult choice. Vaughn states that free will is when "at least some of our choices and actions are not decided for us or forced upon us but are genuinely up to us." (Vaughn, pg.333) Free will is such a dilemma because for humans, it is natural to think that events are caused by previous events, but then again, it is natural to think that we act freely as well, yet together, these plausible beliefs cannot be true. The two general ways to respond to this problem are Compatibilism and Incompatibilism. The ladder says that free will and determinism are not compatible.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Free Will Vs Determinism

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A neutral stance to this is the claim that “ one can be held morally responsible for one’s actions only if one could have acted otherwise in a given set of circumstances.” (The Philosophical Review, page 440). Determinist would disagree with this claim because it is if an agent is never in control of the situations that they are forced into, how can they be morally responsible. Free will does not easily tie into the premise because if we choose our own action then we should be held morally reasonable for them, but if one said that “X” did Y because she/ he could it fails to prove moral responsibility and seems as if our action or arbitrary or random. However if an act is described as “not determined” or “uncaused” that means that free will cannot be used because the action is random therefore not in the agent’s power, thus making morally responsibility invalid. Simply, without the just the agent being the cause of an action, they cannot be held to moral…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is different with libertarianism as determinism believes that we were already determined by certain causes outside of the power of will, while libertarianism believes in the theory that we are truly free in our choices. They also disagree on the idea of responsibility; determinist does not believe we can be responsible when we have no free will, while libertarians think differently. Although determinism and libertarianism have little to none in common, compatibilism can bring them together. The way that free will is compatible with determinism is called compatibilism. Although compatibilism and libertarianism are similar, they can also be quite different.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Moreover, they believe freedom requires indeterminism. Lastly, Compatibilism or soft determinism believes that that all actions have a cause and that free will is compatible with determinism. Compatibilists according to scientist believe that freedom can be present or absent in situations for other reasons and has nothing to do with the logics behind it. Ultimately, free will exist despite the help from…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays