The Cid And The Prince: An Analysis

Superior Essays
Both writings, The Poem of the Cid and The Prince, discuss political and military leadership tactics. The Poem of the Cid presents the Cid as one of the great leaders in the history of the Reconquista; he was a remarkable warrior and leader, and his actions showed his superiority. This dominance is shown through his warfare tactics, but also through his religious commitment, his skill and practice of military command, knowledge and practical aims of battle, and cunningness and cleverness. Because the Cid was banished unfairly, he sought to slowly restore his political and moral honor by his own attempts. The Prince, by contrast, written by Machiavelli, is a guide advising on how political and military leaders should rule; it is about power, …show more content…
The Cid was seen as a cunning, intelligent, and insidious leader, especially when he deliberately thought to fill two chests up with sand and to decorate the outside to make it look lavish and full of riches. He did so with the help of Martin Antolinez and he told him, “You must go in secret to Rachel and Vidas. (Say) that I am forbidden to trade in Burgos and that the King has banished me; I cannot carry my wealth about with me as it is too heavy, so I intend to pawn it for a reasonable sum” (The Poem of the Cid, 27). In other words, he was cheating the Jewish bankers of cash to obtain some so he could go on and start his adventure. The Jews of Burgos were people of wealth, they were traders, bankers, and merchants, and the Cid knew of this. The Cid was very cunning and moreover clever in how he tackled his problem of obtaining riches in order to advance in his mission; he was skillful in planning this idea and was ready to deceive the Jewish bankers Rachel and Vidas in order to get what he wanted, money and riches. Likewise, Septimius Severus, a Roman emperor, acted the part of both a fox and lion as Machiavelli puts it. In other words, he acted as a fierce, clever lion and a very cunning fox. This was illustrated when he was seeking to become emperor of Rome. Severus and his army moved to Rome after Julian was put to death and the Senate voted him emperor out of …show more content…
The time periods from Medieval to Renaissance was a time of transition in humanism. The Poem of the Cid, which illustrated the Medieval time period, was a time that concentrated on the power of God through warfare and gaining riches. By contrast, The Prince, written during the Renaissance period, was a time that was directed more on the authority of the individual, focusing on how to better oneself and become powerful. During the Medieval period, God was the key being with power and because of this, political and military figures had a stronger belief in God and a stronger relationship with Him and other religious figures. The Cid regarded a close relationship between ethics and politics. He was a strong believer, always praying for intercession; he sought such devotion to his Lord. This is depicted in the First Cantar of The Poem of the Cid when the Cid said with praise “Thanks be to God on high for the great victory we have gained!” (The Poem of the Cid, 63). The Cid often called upon and praised God and saints to help and protect him when in battle; they were to be alongside the Cid when he fought. With the Cid recognizing those powerful superiors, he is showing his humility by concentrating on the powerful deities rather than focusing on himself. During the Renaissance

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince is a guide on how a proper prince should rule his nation. Machiavelli demonstrates how the past rulers have either been successful or not. Even as his audience were that of monarchs, many of his teachings’ outcomes can be seen in present day. In chapter 12, Machiavelli comments on the usage of mercenary troops.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli and Socrates Would Not Support the Same Prince While both Socrates and Niccolo Machiavelli grew up in times of political turmoil and economic instability, Socrates would not be supportive of Machiavelli’s concept of a good prince. Their concepts of an effective ruler are completely different – the extent of their similarities are their experiences with political fragmentation and war. Both aim to establish a long-lasting government, but Machiavelli believes a ruthless ruler without regard to morality is needed, while Socrates would suggest a virtuous ruler is vital to establishing a stable government. In The Prince And the Discourses, Machiavelli articulates what makes a good ruler and provides guidelines for how they should rule.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In one section of the article, Vincent Barnett discusses some of the alternative ways that Machiavelli’s The Prince can be interpreted. One interpretation was that Machiavelli possibly intended for his writing to be satirical, because certain facts, such as how Machiavelli had a family, refute his statement from the pamphlet that he believes all humans are evil. Also, it is possible that Machiavelli didn’t actually agree with the ideas in his writing, but he only wrote those things to gain favor from the leaders of his time. These are just possibilities, but knowing about Machiavelli’s life and his situation are important in order to understand his motives for writing The Prince. Just like Machiavelli, present-day leaders and authors make…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay explains how the conspirators convinced others to help them overthrow Caesar and whether their reason was based on logic or emotions. Power can corrupt anyone, even the greatest of men. The Idea to overthrow Caesar didn't occur until he tried to obtain the crown, become…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates Is No Prince Socrates and Machiavelli lived in a time of political and civil disarray and chaos. Their thoughts on political philosophy and theory are a product of the times in which they lived. Through interpretations of their own political climate, Socrates and Machiavelli produced two schools of political thought that are incredibly different and contrasting. Plato’s Apology and Crito and Machiavelii’s The Prince present these two vastly disparate ideologies.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Knowing Caesar to be arrogant and full of hubris, Decius…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli in The Prince is primarily a practical observer and diplomat analyst prescribing numerous ethical and political instructions to Cesar Borgia for pyramidical maintenance, sustenance and enhancement of political power at various stages of capturing, nurturing, preserving and augmenting power and absolute power for the prince. Hobbes’s aim in his Leviathan is similar to that of Machiavelli’s The Prince. Both are equally concerned for bringing about order out of chaotic civil war like situation in England and arbitrary ruler in Italy respectively. Hobbes is making an all-out effort to create an edifice and basis of scientific foundation for the need of a sovereign power through his so called scientific materialism. That is why he discusses at length human nature, psyche and need for sociological order in society.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through their powerful renderings of war and politics, Niccolò Machiavelli's iconoclastic 1532 political treatise The Prince and Shakespeare's 1599 historical tragedy Julius Caesar mutually seek to explore the nature of human weakness. A manifestation of Machiavelli's radically realpolitik interpretation of Renaissance humanism, The Prince subverts the traditional Christian moral zeitgeist, redefining weakness in instrumental terms - that a leader's results are superior in importance to his means of achieving them. While influenced by the comparable circumstances of the inchoate European Renaissance, Julius Caesar explores in a more nuanced manner the notion that a ruler's weaknesses are not subject merely to instrumentalist justification,…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Tyrannical Philosophies of The Arab Spring Both Niccolo Machiavelli 's “The Prince” Étienne de La Boéties work “The Politics of Obedience” discuss the philosophical views behind a tyrant and the effect of this political structure on the people being ruled. While Machiavelli seems to focus on the techniques tyrants use to maintain power keep their elite status, La Boéties discusses the approach from the point of view of the people being ruled over. Both pieces give the audience an insight into the possible reasons tyrants can maintain power and how they can lose it. One famous metaphor Machiavelli uses to demonstrate the possible characteristics of a tyrant is through his description of the necessity for a successful tyrant to maintain a…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Machiavelli and Socrates both lived during times of uncertainty, political fragmentation and violence, their philosophies about how the state should conduct itself are in direct contrast with one another. Machiavelli’s the Prince is founded on the principal that if a ruler wishes to maintain power, he should embody the ideology of pragmatism, while Socrates believes the state should follow him in his commitment to moral purity and justice. The inherent dissonance between these philosophies would lead Socrates to be unsupportive of Machiavelli’s concept of a prince, and consequently the political system Machiavelli would recommend he install, despite his apparent change in rhetoric from the Apology to the Crito. Throughout Plato’s interpretation…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This presentation of the Moors character also offsets how virtuous El Cid 's Christian soldiers are, as gold is just a reward for their good works of ousting the Muslims from the fringe. These good Christian habits are later reflected on the Moors who remained in Alcocer, as they lamented his departure: ' My Cid, you 're leaving us! Our prayers will always precede you!…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An explanation that is potentially one of the more conventional validations of the relationship between Machiavelli’s The Prince and the Discourses is reading The Prince as a manual for the founder of what would eventually emerge as a republic. Once the prince has established a foundation of the state, the republic that Machiavelli advocates for in the Discourses will become achievable and desirable. The Prince was written to establish a unified state; the republic in the Discourses will maintain that stable and unified state. Academic Leo Strauss explains that Machiavelli wrote the Discourses to promote the imitation of ancient republics. Machiavelli longed for the rebirth of ancient republicanism .…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Organization of Society Machiavelli’s The Prince, a story is told, explaining multiple routes of portraying his definition of a “good” prince. He then divulges his beliefs of how one should never forget to prepare for or contemplate war, study history, remain armed at all times and be a “miser”. Rousseau’s The Origin of Civil Society, is based upon an entirely different morale which derives from reasoning and ethics.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Prince, in contrast, is a tyranny and bares tension with republicanism. A tyranny is exactly what is identified as a bad counterpart in the Discourses. This distinction does strain the potential relationship between the two texts, yet this is only validated if the two texts are read in mutual exclusion and without the consideration of external historical…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli’s understanding of virtue and effective rule emphasizes the maintenance of political power and the disregard for morality, differing from the ideology of the classic political philosophers. Machiavelli’s concept of virtue is centered around the glorification of a ruler, facilitated by behavioural traits such as bravery, cleverness, deceptiveness, and ruthlessness. Effective rule requires these attributes, as the successful application of these characteristics towards the acquisition and maintenance of power will allow one to become a powerful leader. Machiavelli first explains the foundations of various principalities, such as hereditary and mixed principalities, as the maintenance of power differs…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays