Self Value Relativism Vs Multiculturalism

1. Part One: Thesis Statement While With different cultures having their own practices that are separate from the rest of the world, one has no choice but to respect their beliefs and values same as the western part of the world would want. , No individual, no matter what culture or religion, should be permitted to take advantage or harm another human being. Relativism says that harming another human being is permissible if a certain culture says that it is correct to do so. In regards to a human life, every human being is of equal value and no one deserves more or less than the other. It is very cruel to want to willingly harm someone without it being for reasons of self defense. Everyone in the entire world should be prohibited from taking any kind of advantage over another person 's life without that person 's permission to do so. It should be totally illegal all over the world to cause harm to another life and the violator should be held accountable in regards to their actions. because Morally, taking advantage of another human life is very heartless, and egocentric., Every human life has feelings, self …show more content…
The question is, should people be held responsible for immoral behavior when most of their community or culture also behaves that way and the answer is yes, absolutely. No behavior that harms another should be regarded as obligatory or prohibited regardless of time, place, culture, or any other contingent circumstance. What should our response be to behavior in other cultures that are disturbing or seem morally wrong? In reality, the only response we can have to this atrocity is to respect it because we cannot intervene in another country’s laws and the way they chose to practice them in another part of the